Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
MVC
Evansville logo

Evansville

11-21NET#240Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #298Coach: Walter McCarty
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LIllinois logoLXavier logoWKWWTexas Southern logoLBall St. logoWWyoming logoWALLArkansas St. logoWBall St. logoLJacksonville St. logoLMurray St. logoWGreen Bay logoLMiami OH logoWDrake logoLIllinois St. logoWLoyola Chicago logoLIndiana St. logoWMissouri St. logoLIllinois St. logoLDrake logoLNorthern Iowa logoLBradley logoWValparaiso logoLIndiana St. logoLSouthern Illinois logoLMissouri St. logoLNorthern Iowa logoLLoyola Chicago logoLBradley logoLSouthern Illinois logoWValparaiso logoLIllinois St. logo

Team Stats

32 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-3.927
  • Offensive Rating105.817
  • Defensive Rating109.751
  • Pace66.058
  • Effective FG%49.5%29
  • Off Rebound Pct18.8%1
  • Turnover Pct19.4%57
  • FT Attempt Rate37.2%82

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct34.4%18
  • Point Margin / Game-2.626
  • Points / Game69.829
  • Points Allowed / Game72.442
  • 1st Half Margin-3.910
  • 2nd Half Margin1.359
  • Avg Largest Lead7.915
  • Avg Largest Deficit12.427

Box Score

  • Points / Game69.829
  • Rebounds / Game34.131
  • Assists / Game12.328
  • ORebs / Game6.82
  • DRebs / Game27.388
  • Steals / Game5.833
  • Blocks / Game2.832
  • Turnovers / Game12.853
  • PFs / Game18.827

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.311
  • FGAs / Game55.419
  • Field Goal Pct42.1%18
  • 2PMs / Game15.16
  • 2PAs / Game31.110
  • 2-Point Pct48.5%28
  • 3PMs / Game8.367
  • 3PAs / Game24.375
  • 3-Point Pct33.9%40
  • FTMs / Game14.975
  • FTAs / Game20.671
  • Free Throw Pct72.1%65

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s43.2%8
  • % Pts from 3s35.5%75
  • % Pts from FTs21.3%87
  • Paint Pts / Game20.442
  • % Pts in Paint29.3%46
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.929
  • % Pts on Fast Break5.6%31
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.841
  • % Pts off TOVs15.4%44
  • 1st Half Pts / Game30.29
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game38.762

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.1%42
  • Points / Shot1.2655
  • 3-Point Att Rate43.9%85
  • Assist Pct52.7%55
  • Assists / 100 Poss18.720
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.96x33
  • PF Drawn / Game18.872

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.1%60
  • Opp True Shooting %53.9%60
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.6%43
  • Opp 2-Point Pct49.0%64
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.9%42
  • Opp 3PA Rate31.1%98
  • Opp FT Att Rate37.5%19
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2647

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game72.442
  • Paint Pts Allowed23.635
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.463
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.044
  • Opp Assist Pct43.7%94
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.131

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct73.9%77
  • Turnovers Forced Pct18.4%26
  • Steal Pct8.7%25
  • Block Pct4.2%26
  • Hakeem Pct12.9%19
  • PF Efficiency1.07x37
  • Steals / PF0.31x25
  • Blocks / PF0.15x29

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #58Opp OREB%25.3%
  • #62FTAR37.2%
  • #623PM Diff+53
  • #143Opp eFG%49.8%
  • #151TOV%18.2%
  • #158AST%52.7%
  • #160SOS-0.7
  • #179Adj DRtg105.3
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #352OREB%19.1%
  • #323REB Diff-124
  • #282Adj ORtg99.3
  • #264Opp TOV%17.6%
  • #261Pts Diff-83
  • #254eFG%49.5%
  • #244Paint Pts %36.4%
  • #238FB Pts %7.5%
Game Log
Loading game log…
M. HillSr6'5"+0.86656.6%6320.3%6711.53.91.642.3%73.2%
S. FeehanSr6'0"+0.44357.2%6519.8%639.82.41.136.2%88.6%
S. GivanceFr5'10"+0.33548.8%2620.7%694.72.72.334.1%72.9%
K.J. RileyJr6'5"-0.12153.8%4826.1%9113.65.03.016.0%72.9%
E. KuhlmanSo6'8"-0.12052.4%4115.7%336.22.91.232.0%88.0%
N. FrederkingSo6'4"-0.11863.3%8614.5%256.32.00.736.7%60.0%
J. HallSo6'7"-0.21554.2%5117.4%459.06.61.035.8%51.2%
D. ChatkeviciusSr6'9"-0.41053.9%4927.2%946.74.70.916.7%60.0%
J. NewtonFr6'3"47.7%2314.7%273.12.30.623.8%79.4%
J. ChestnutSr6'2"1.5%20.00.10.10.0%0.0%
D. StraubSo6'2"47.2%2216.6%391.30.10.325.0%100.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Evansville logo25-267-25#320-13.212101.513114.7232.772-1457-471823.0%2+691249.9%2532.8%3173.1%56
Evansville logo24-2511-21#267-7.72699.310107.0580.167-9916-541022.8%4+223149.5%2630.3%669.7%27
Evansville logo23-2417-18#220-3.839102.932106.7510.864-6823-78522.5%3-195750.6%4333.6%4371.8%47
Evansville logo22-235-27#354-18.5292.21110.719-0.560-2181-84520.7%2-296545.1%232.2%2263.0%2
Evansville logo21-226-24#328-14.9893.74108.6241.568-2291+418014.5%0-135547.5%1633.0%3670.8%43
Evansville logo19-209-23#294-9.61797.421107.0210.164-1466+497820.3%1+292649.0%3732.1%3173.0%70
Evansville logo18-1911-21#240-5.93299.320105.350-0.756-1249+538419.1%1+144049.5%2933.9%4072.1%65
Evansville logo17-1817-15#1462.459101.62799.2870.765+3556-621024.8%15-75249.8%3141.1%9977.5%96
Evansville logo16-1716-17#1570.855103.647102.8631.366+2554-115127.3%28-306649.0%2936.6%7071.3%63
Evansville logo15-1624-9#689.681107.56797.986-1.449+10479-481924.8%8-125553.4%8735.3%5872.4%77
Evansville logo14-1523-12#1055.370106.171100.8640.262+3758-85526.5%10-357052.6%8535.5%6574.8%94
Evansville logo13-1412-19#223-4.437103.640108.0350.763-6925-94126.8%11+124350.7%6336.2%7371.8%69

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
53.5%#206
Effective FG %
49.5%#252
3-Point %
33.9%#211
3PAR
43.9%#49
FTAR
37.2%#61
Assist %
52.7%#157

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.3%#212
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
21.8%#90
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

21 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.8% of shots at 0.65 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0944.8%0.65Middle (11–20s): 31.2% of shots at 1.28 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0431.2%1.28Late (21s+): 24.0% of shots at 1.15 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9724.0%1.15SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 47.2% of shots at 0.79 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0747.2%0.79Middle (11–20s): 28.9% of shots at 1.12 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0228.9%1.12Late (21s+): 23.9% of shots at 1.26 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9523.9%1.26SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

21 games
Created byFinished by
K.J. Riley → Evan Kuhlman: 15 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 12 from three)K.J. Riley → John Hall: 13 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)K.J. Riley → Marty Hill: 7 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)K.J. Riley → Noah Frederking: 9 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 9 from three)K.J. Riley → Dainius Chatkevicius: 7 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Shamar Givance → Evan Kuhlman: 7 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Shamar Givance → Marty Hill: 11 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 10 from three)Shamar Givance → Noah Frederking: 10 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 8 from three)Shamar Givance → Shea Feehan: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Marty Hill → Evan Kuhlman: 8 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Marty Hill → John Hall: 8 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)John Hall → Shea Feehan: 8 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 8 from three)Shea Feehan → John Hall: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Noah Frederking → Marty Hill: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Riley51 astGivance34 astHill16 astHall8 astFeehanFrederkingKuhlman30 madeHall27 madeHill24 madeFrederking19 madeFeehan14 madeChatkevicius
Frederking is the least-assisted finisher — 77% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.