Florida Atlantic16-15

AmericanCoach: John Jakus

16-15NET#120

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Elohim	1,455	661	68.8%	−5.130	−4.128	+1.044	−6.36	−0.942	−3.592	−0.550	+1.334	+1.264	−0.542	−8.388
Kanaan Carlyle	1,410	705	66.7%	+8.582	+3.570	−5.176	+3.282	−3.620	−2.384	−13.54	−4.690	−4.116	+0.356	−5.678
Niccolo Moretti	1,387	729	65.5%	−2.342	−5.522	−3.268	−2.030	−4.216	+0.540	+7.486	−3.986	−0.644	−2.316	+2.138
Devin Williams	1,245	871	58.8%	−4.634	−4.924	−0.452	−1.930	−3.422	+0.146	−9.010	−3.180	−1.732	−3.38	−10.192
Devin Vanterpool	1,170	946	55.3%	+6.776	+4.576	−2.362	+1.466	+0.354	−1.574	−0.648	+0.346	+0.556	+2.284	+3.032
Josiah Parker	1,138	978	53.8%	−13.710	−7.018	+6.714	−4.114	−1.934	−1.066	+8.390	+0.248	−4.414	−3.38	−1.760
Xander Pintelon	957	1,159	45.2%	+8.682	+5.178	−3.568	+3.686	+1.970	+1.034	−6.220	+1.630	+3.182	+3.494	+2.634
Maxim Logue	508	1,608	24.0%	+4.166	+2.364	−1.860	+1.062	+4.788	+0.638	+3.772	+0.446	+0.658	+2.688	+11.06
Amar Amkou	507	1,609	24.0%	+0.854	+5.882	+5.022	+2.576	+1.566	+0.442	+5.078	+4.112	+2.474	−0.444	−1.056
Yohann Sissoko	444	1,672	21.0%	−0.848	+4.274	+5.022	+1.870	+6.596	+3.110	+9.492	+4.410	+1.464	+0.966	+8.910
Max Langenfeld	184	1,932	8.7%	−20.54	−7.816	+12.72	+0.658	−2.926	+3.110	+1.058	+8.90	+5.092	−0.346	+9.58
Vincent Neugebauer	145	1,971	6.8%	+20.998	+9.192	−11.894	+5.394	+8.898	+3.96	+1.460	−3.180	+0.758	+4.298	−1.560

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Elohim	1,455	661	68.8%	0.446	106.540	106.152	50.2%42	30.9%54	16.8%42	32.7%48	49.9%58	72.4%60	15.3%44	33.9%44
Kanaan Carlyle	1,410	705	66.7%	4.854	108.946	104.158	53.2%54	30.0%50	17.1%38	28.6%38	48.0%64	70.7%52	15.5%46	34.7%42
Niccolo Moretti	1,387	729	65.5%	1.248	105.938	104.756	51.4%46	29.7%50	18.0%32	35.5%56	48.2%64	71.8%58	14.7%38	37.1%36
Devin Williams	1,245	871	58.8%	0.146	105.738	105.654	51.4%46	29.8%50	17.9%34	29.2%40	48.3%62	71.3%56	14.1%34	32.6%48
Devin Vanterpool	1,170	946	55.3%	5.054	109.848	104.856	52.8%52	31.3%56	17.2%38	32.6%48	49.6%58	72.2%60	16.4%52	37.8%34
Josiah Parker	1,138	978	53.8%	-4.338	104.636	108.946	50.2%42	30.3%52	17.4%36	36.8%58	49.5%58	70.0%50	13.9%34	35.7%40
Xander Pintelon	957	1,159	45.2%	6.758	110.650	103.958	54.1%58	32.2%60	18.4%30	29.5%40	50.4%52	73.8%66	17.3%60	37.9%34
Maxim Logue	508	1,608	24.0%	5.154	109.548	104.458	52.9%52	34.8%68	18.3%30	35.7%56	49.7%58	72.5%62	17.4%60	45.0%20
Amar Amkou	507	1,609	24.0%	2.650	112.254	109.644	54.1%58	32.4%60	18.1%32	36.8%58	52.6%42	73.8%66	15.1%42	35.6%40
Yohann Sissoko	444	1,672	21.0%	1.448	111.152	109.744	53.6%56	36.4%74	20.3%20	40.4%66	53.0%40	73.1%64	16.1%50	43.6%22
Max Langenfeld	184	1,932	8.7%	-16.720	100.728	117.426	52.7%52	28.6%46	20.7%18	33.8%52	57.6%22	76.6%76	15.1%42	45.1%20
Vincent Neugebauer	145	1,971	6.8%	21.480	116.364	94.878	57.1%72	39.4%84	21.5%14	34.2%52	46.6%70	72.6%62	19.4%72	35.0%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Elohim	1,455	661	68.8%	5.554	110.650	105.156	56.6%70	31.8%58	20.3%20	33.2%50	48.5%62	71.1%54	15.8%48	42.2%26
Kanaan Carlyle	1,410	705	66.7%	-3.740	105.536	109.246	50.0%36	33.6%66	19.4%24	42.1%70	52.6%42	74.9%70	15.3%44	40.2%28
Niccolo Moretti	1,387	729	65.5%	3.552	111.452	107.948	53.4%56	33.9%66	17.6%36	28.1%36	52.1%44	72.4%62	17.0%56	35.1%42
Devin Williams	1,245	871	58.8%	4.754	110.750	106.054	53.3%54	33.2%62	17.8%34	38.2%62	51.4%48	73.0%64	17.4%60	42.6%24
Devin Vanterpool	1,170	946	55.3%	-1.742	105.336	107.050	51.4%46	31.0%54	18.7%28	33.2%50	49.3%58	71.7%58	14.2%36	34.8%42
Josiah Parker	1,138	978	53.8%	9.462	111.552	102.164	54.4%60	32.2%60	18.4%30	28.5%38	49.4%58	74.4%68	17.2%58	37.4%36
Xander Pintelon	957	1,159	45.2%	-1.942	105.536	107.350	50.5%42	30.3%52	17.4%36	35.7%56	48.8%60	70.6%52	13.9%34	35.3%40
Maxim Logue	508	1,608	24.0%	1.048	107.242	106.252	51.9%48	30.1%52	17.7%34	32.0%46	49.4%58	71.8%58	14.8%40	34.0%44
Amar Amkou	507	1,609	24.0%	1.848	106.440	104.656	51.6%46	30.8%54	17.8%34	31.7%46	48.5%62	71.5%58	15.6%46	36.7%36
Yohann Sissoko	444	1,672	21.0%	2.150	106.940	104.756	51.8%48	29.8%50	17.2%38	31.0%44	48.6%62	71.7%58	15.3%44	34.7%42
Max Langenfeld	184	1,932	8.7%	3.852	108.444	104.756	52.1%50	31.4%56	17.6%36	32.8%48	48.8%60	71.6%58	15.5%44	35.7%40
Vincent Neugebauer	145	1,971	6.8%	0.646	107.140	106.652	51.8%48	30.6%52	17.6%36	32.8%48	49.7%58	71.9%58	15.2%42	36.5%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Florida AtlanticFAU16-15

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Florida Atlantic16-15