Gardner Webb2-28

Big SouthCoach: Jeremy Luther

2-28NET#362

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Colin Hawkins	1,249	734	63.0%	−7.324	−2.140	+5.220	−0.446	−4.414	+0.344	+2.666	−0.252	+0.758	−3.86	−2.564
Jacob Hogarth	1,229	754	62.0%	−0.350	+0.956	+1.242	−1.436	+7.798	+0.148	−1.840	+3.516	+0.454	+1.778	−9.792
Ace Talbert	1,206	777	60.8%	+11.088	+4.576	−6.582	−2.128	−1.338	−5.498	+1.862	−2.070	+0.150	+3.092	+0.248
Spence Sims	1,200	783	60.5%	−11.514	−3.930	+7.612	+0.658	−2.628	+1.526	−5.024	+4.012	−1.238	−1.526	−4.272
Jacob Hudson	1,155	828	58.2%	+11.790	+6.684	−5.176	+1.970	+4.386	−0.760	+5.380	−0.656	+1.162	+2.588	+3.628
Jamias Ferere	879	1,104	44.3%	−4.036	−1.642	+2.434	−2.128	+4.890	+0.540	−1.344	+1.432	−5.68	+0.968	−1.258
Curtis Williams III	785	1,198	39.6%	+6.274	+6.082	−0.250	+0.658	−1.042	−3.090	−2.536	+0.742	+3.584	+0.356	+5.322
DJ Jefferson	735	1,248	37.1%	+0.352	−4.030	−4.372	+0.860	−1.636	+1.820	−1.742	−0.758	+3.584	−0.346	−2.966
NaVuan Peterson	561	1,422	28.3%	+3.664	+4.978	+1.340	+2.576	−4.116	−2.282	+4.776	−2.474	−2.526	−2.020	+0.448
Riek Riek	433	1,550	21.9%	+1.156	−0.946	−2.060	+2.374	−3.124	+1.328	+1.158	−1.564	+3.484	−0.738	+6.616
Bo Barber	205	1,778	10.3%	+3.966	+2.866	−1.156	+5.494	+0.860	+4.14	−6.518	−4.990	−5.58	−0.052	+9.98
Julius Clark	162	1,821	8.2%	−17.26	−11.08	+6.216	−3.916	+4.388	+6.50	+9.292	+1.236	+3.886	−3.38	+5.022

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Colin Hawkins	1,249	734	63.0%	-29.010	94.316	123.316	48.0%30	21.8%20	19.4%24	31.3%44	56.5%26	64.3%26	13.8%32	33.6%44
Jacob Hogarth	1,229	754	62.0%	-26.412	95.418	121.818	47.7%30	26.4%36	19.3%24	29.7%40	57.9%22	64.2%26	15.9%48	30.9%52
Ace Talbert	1,206	777	60.8%	-22.116	96.820	118.924	47.4%28	23.0%24	17.2%38	31.0%44	55.8%30	64.0%26	16.4%52	34.6%42
Spence Sims	1,200	783	60.5%	-31.010	93.516	124.514	48.5%32	22.5%22	19.8%22	28.4%38	58.2%20	63.5%24	14.6%38	32.9%46
Jacob Hudson	1,155	828	58.2%	-21.516	97.822	119.324	49.0%34	25.3%32	19.0%26	32.6%48	56.3%26	64.5%28	16.3%50	36.1%38
Jamias Ferere	879	1,104	44.3%	-28.610	94.216	122.718	47.0%26	26.1%34	19.6%22	29.6%40	57.4%22	60.9%18	15.8%48	33.9%44
Curtis Williams III	785	1,198	39.6%	-22.614	98.724	121.320	48.5%34	22.9%24	17.4%36	28.8%38	57.0%24	66.1%32	15.4%44	37.7%34
DJ Jefferson	735	1,248	37.1%	-26.212	92.614	118.724	48.7%34	22.5%22	20.4%18	29.3%40	56.1%28	66.2%32	15.1%42	32.7%46
NaVuan Peterson	561	1,422	28.3%	-23.714	98.624	122.318	50.0%36	20.6%18	17.7%34	33.7%52	54.8%32	62.3%20	13.8%32	34.8%42
Riek Riek	433	1,550	21.9%	-25.412	94.416	119.822	50.0%36	21.0%18	20.3%20	31.2%44	55.4%30	66.7%32	14.7%38	39.7%30
Bo Barber	205	1,778	10.3%	-22.814	97.622	120.422	53.1%54	24.2%28	22.9%10	24.5%26	52.2%44	59.1%14	15.2%44	43.4%22
Julius Clark	162	1,821	8.2%	-42.14	85.08	127.112	44.6%18	27.5%40	25.3%4	38.8%64	57.7%22	67.5%38	12.2%22	39.2%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Colin Hawkins	1,249	734	63.0%	-21.716	96.420	118.126	48.4%32	26.2%34	19.1%26	28.8%38	56.7%26	63.6%24	17.6%62	36.2%38
Jacob Hogarth	1,229	754	62.0%	-26.112	94.516	120.620	49.1%36	18.6%12	19.2%24	31.5%46	54.4%34	63.8%26	14.2%34	40.6%28
Ace Talbert	1,206	777	60.8%	-33.08	92.314	125.314	49.5%36	24.3%28	22.5%10	29.2%40	57.8%22	64.0%26	13.4%30	34.4%42
Spence Sims	1,200	783	60.5%	-19.518	97.422	116.928	47.8%30	25.1%32	18.4%30	33.3%50	54.2%36	64.7%28	16.1%50	37.0%36
Jacob Hudson	1,155	828	58.2%	-33.18	91.212	124.314	47.1%28	21.1%18	19.7%22	27.3%34	56.9%24	63.4%24	13.8%32	32.5%48
Jamias Ferere	879	1,104	44.3%	-24.614	95.818	120.322	49.1%36	21.3%18	19.0%26	31.0%44	55.9%28	66.5%32	14.8%40	35.1%42
Curtis Williams III	785	1,198	39.6%	-28.810	92.714	121.520	48.0%30	23.9%26	20.5%18	31.4%44	56.3%26	62.7%22	15.1%42	32.5%48
DJ Jefferson	735	1,248	37.1%	-26.412	96.520	123.016	47.9%30	24.1%28	18.6%30	31.0%44	56.8%24	62.7%22	15.3%44	35.6%40
NaVuan Peterson	561	1,422	28.3%	-27.412	93.716	121.020	47.5%28	24.6%28	19.9%22	29.1%38	57.3%24	64.8%28	15.8%48	34.4%42
Riek Riek	433	1,550	21.9%	-26.612	95.318	121.818	47.7%30	24.2%28	19.0%26	30.1%42	56.9%24	63.3%24	15.4%44	33.1%46
Bo Barber	205	1,778	10.3%	-26.712	94.818	121.520	47.6%30	23.4%24	18.8%28	31.0%44	57.1%24	64.7%28	15.2%44	33.5%44
Julius Clark	162	1,821	8.2%	-24.914	96.018	120.920	48.5%32	23.2%24	18.7%28	29.7%40	56.5%26	63.7%26	15.5%46	34.1%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.