Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logoGrambling St. logoGrambling St. logo

Grambling St.4-22

SWACCoach: Joseph Price

4-22NET#350
Schedule
LDePaul logoDePaul logoLMarquette logoMarquette logoLMissouri St. logoMissouri St. logoLArizona St. logoArizona St. logoWLTCU logoTCU logoLLEvansville logoEvansville logoLLittle Rock logoLittle Rock logoLAlabama St. logoAlabama St. logoLAlabama A&M logoAlabama A&M logoLAlcorn St. logoAlcorn St. logoLTexas Southern logoTexas Southern logoLPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoLJackson St. logoJackson St. logoLArkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff logoLMississippi Valley St. logoMississippi Valley St. logoLSouthern logoSouthern logoWAlcorn St. logoAlcorn St. logoLTexas Southern logoTexas Southern logoWPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoLJackson St. logoJackson St. logoLArkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff logoWMississippi Valley St. logoMississippi Valley St. logoLAlabama St. logoAlabama St. logoLAlabama A&M logoAlabama A&M logoWJackson St. logoJackson St. logoLTexas Southern logoTexas Southern logo

Team Stats

26 games
  • Net Rating-53.40
  • Offensive Rating231.798
  • Defensive Rating285.21
  • Pace28.51
  • Effective FG%46.8%20
  • Off Rebound Pct30.9%45
  • Turnover Pct53.0%1
  • FT Attempt Rate40.2%50

Team Stats

26 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-53.40
  • Offensive Rating231.798
  • Defensive Rating285.21
  • Pace28.51
  • Effective FG%46.8%20
  • Off Rebound Pct30.9%45
  • Turnover Pct53.0%1
  • FT Attempt Rate40.2%50

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct15.4%4
  • Point Margin / Game-15.21
  • Points / Game66.022
  • Points Allowed / Game81.32
  • 1st Half Margin-7.81
  • 2nd Half Margin-7.41
  • Avg Largest Lead––
  • Avg Largest Deficit––

Box Score

  • Points / Game66.022
  • Rebounds / Game31.516
  • Assists / Game10.511
  • ORebs / Game11.056
  • DRebs / Game20.55
  • Steals / Game5.738
  • Blocks / Game2.19
  • Turnovers / Game15.14
  • PFs / Game19.249

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game22.416
  • FGAs / Game54.748
  • Field Goal Pct41.0%13
  • 2PMs / Game16.117
  • 2PAs / Game35.230
  • 2-Point Pct45.8%20
  • 3PMs / Game6.356
  • 3PAs / Game19.569
  • 3-Point Pct32.4%25
  • FTMs / Game14.937
  • FTAs / Game22.046
  • Free Throw Pct67.8%27

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s48.8%31
  • % Pts from 3s28.7%66
  • % Pts from FTs22.5%58
  • Paint Pts / Game3.12
  • % Pts in Paint4.7%3
  • Fast Break Pts / Game0.66
  • % Pts on Fast Break0.9%6
  • Points off TOVs / Game4.16
  • % Pts off TOVs6.2%9
  • 1st Half Pts / Game29.918
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game36.136

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %51.3%19
  • Points / Shot1.2123
  • 3-Point Att Rate35.6%72
  • Assist Pct47.0%19
  • Assists / 100 Poss37.098
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.70x3
  • PF Drawn / Game18.224

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%57.4%0
  • Opp True Shooting %60.1%2
  • Opp Field Goal Pct51.2%0
  • Opp 2-Point Pct57.9%1
  • Opp 3-Point Pct37.6%12
  • Opp 3PA Rate33.2%47
  • Opp FT Att Rate40.8%49
  • Opp Points / Shot1.425

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game81.32
  • Paint Pts Allowed6.089
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed1.676
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed5.583
  • Opp Assist Pct56.4%16
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.661

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct64.0%5
  • Turnovers Forced Pct44.3%97
  • Steal Pct20.0%97
  • Block Pct7.3%74
  • Hakeem Pct27.3%97
  • PF Efficiency1.06x27
  • Steals / PF0.30x41
  • Blocks / PF0.11x10

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams
  • #176FTAR40.2%
  • #192Opp TOV%18.2%
  • #197OREB%30.9%
  • #2283PM Diff-22
  • #2663P%32.4%
  • #284AST%47.0%
  • #285eFG%46.8%
  • #289TS%50.7%
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #176FTAR40.2%
  • #192Opp TOV%18.2%
  • #197OREB%30.9%
  • #2283PM Diff-22
  • #2663P%32.4%
  • #284AST%47.0%
  • #285eFG%46.8%
  • #289TS%50.7%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #351Adj DRtg120.4
  • #350Opp eFG%57.4%
  • #348Pts Diff-396
  • #347SOS-8.6
  • #333Opp OREB%36.0%
  • #332TOV%21.9%
  • #327Adj ORtg94.9
  • #310Opp 3P%37.6%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2013-14
Find Similar
  1. 1Delaware St. logoDelaware St. logoDelaware St. 2020-211-16MEAC90
  2. 2Jackson St. logoJackson St. logoJackson St. 2025-2612-21SWAC89
  3. 3Howard logoHoward logoHoward 2019-203-28MEAC85
  4. 4Houston Christian logoHouston Christian logoHouston Christian 2020-215-19Southland83
  5. 5Prairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M 2013-1410-23SWAC82
  6. 6Central Arkansas logoCentral Arkansas logoCentral Arkansas 2014-152-27Southland82
  7. 7Arkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff 2024-254-25SWAC82
  8. 8Central Arkansas logoCentral Arkansas logoCentral Arkansas 2023-247-23ASUN80
  9. 9Arkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff 2021-225-24SWAC80
  10. 10Columbia logoColumbia logoColumbia 2022-235-22Ivy78
Schedule
Loading the schedule
ASAntwanScottJrRBRemondBrownFrCTChandlerThomasSr
Chase Comier headshotChaseComierFr
SDStevenDanridgeSr
TRTerryRoseSoASA'TorriShineJr
BTBrauhnye'TurnerSo
WGWindaleGlintonFr
FWFloyddellWilsonN/A
RSReginaldSmithSo
TBTyronBainSr
RFRichardFreemanFr
DWDionWatsonSr
IPIsahPattersonFr
VAValerioAltheimerFr
A. ScottJr6'1"-0.818––59.6%8426.3%9216.14.33.839.6%81.2%
R. BrownFr6'3"-1.013––51.6%4718.4%548.82.11.235.8%53.1%
C. ThomasSr6'6"-1.013––50.7%4320.7%698.05.90.438.5%59.3%
C. ComierFr5'11"-1.35––39.6%1418.5%544.01.93.032.4%56.6%
S. DanridgeSr6'8"-1.45––55.9%7014.7%274.73.70.40.0%53.8%
T. RoseSo6'4"-1.45––52.5%5217.2%459.71.80.833.6%76.9%
A. ShineJr6'5"-1.71––53.0%5522.7%8013.34.11.129.5%78.6%
B. TurnerSo6'4"–––33.3%910.7%100.30.30.00.0%0.0%
W. GlintonFr6'9"–––49.8%3813.3%192.92.40.20.0%68.4%
F. WilsonN/A-–––54.3%6215.5%331.00.30.00.0%75.0%
R. SmithSo6'1"–––0.0%238.8%1000.00.00.00.0%0.0%
T. BainSr6'2"–––45.4%2322.8%812.51.00.59.1%70.6%
R. FreemanFr6'8"–––35.9%1117.0%432.62.10.320.8%50.0%
D. WatsonSr6'0"–––25.3%627.8%951.00.50.08.3%75.0%
I. PattersonFr6'1"–––0.0%220.0%650.00.00.00.0%0.0%
V. AltheimerFr6'2"–––71.7%9710.6%90.60.40.30.0%50.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo25-2614-19#302-11.61698.65110.248-10.92-1037+115230.8%48-85349.0%1631.8%1873.2%58
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo24-2512-22#314-10.91798.99109.940-7.76-3131-153526.8%21+93948.8%1833.8%4972.9%60
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo23-241621-15#290-8.720100.519109.237-5.719-4330-571429.6%53+93948.7%2533.8%4770.8%35
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo22-2324-9#181-1.049100.119101.177-9.91+6766-351932.8%84-95350.3%4135.6%7464.4%3
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo21-2212-20#309-13.11294.15107.232-5.323-8418-70827.9%47+113945.1%331.5%2171.0%46
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo19-2017-15#293-8.12296.719104.934-10.20+8370-78830.5%70-206149.5%4530.6%1368.2%25
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo18-1917-17#263-7.92595.67103.461-9.42+355804726.8%32+94750.4%4139.6%9968.1%24
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo17-1817-14#295-10.11895.84105.952-9.91+3355-551331.9%79+123646.1%432.8%1771.1%50
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo16-1715-17#331-17.0595.89112.88-12.30-11416-611531.6%73-1279748.0%1631.7%966.3%16
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo15-164-24#343-18.1390.72108.824-8.16-10617-531326.4%18+183745.6%827.3%064.7%7
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo14-150-27#351-34.9079.90114.81-8.33-10613-83229.9%34+156039.8%028.7%365.1%12
Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logo13-144-23#350-26.3094.54120.80-9.31-12010-193631.1%45+501547.0%1632.2%2066.9%23

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
50.7%#285
Effective FG %
46.8%#280
3-Point %
32.4%#260
3PAR
35.6%#98
FTAR
40.2%#175
Assist %
47.0%#284

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
29.3%#309
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
38.5%#308
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

7 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 53.8% of shots at 0.68 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7153.8%0.68Middle (11–20s): 27.8% of shots at 0.84 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2627.8%0.84Late (21s+): 18.4% of shots at 1.11 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2118.4%1.11SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.811D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.683453.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.84027.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.111618.4% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 61.1% of shots at 0.86 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7361.1%0.86Middle (11–20s): 25.5% of shots at 1.45 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2725.5%1.45Late (21s+): 13.4% of shots at 1.65 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2313.4%1.65SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.113Allowed, D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.86561.1% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.45525.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.65013.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 350 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 13-14. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 13-14. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.