Illinois Chicago15-14

MVCCoach: Rob Ehsan

15-14NET#160

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jordan Mason	1,414	543	72.3%	+1.054	+0.956	−0.150	−5.010	+3.078	−3.592	+8.992	−0.656	−1.734	−0.936	−4.474
Filip Skobalj	1,401	557	71.6%	+13.492	+4.776	−8.788	+3.182	−3.026	−2.886	−3.234	−2.476	+4.188	+1.372	−4.072
Tyem Freeman	1,349	608	68.9%	−5.132	−3.432	+1.740	−2.426	−0.250	+0.540	+3.874	−0.352	−0.646	−1.626	+2.038
Javon Jackson	1,241	716	63.4%	−3.140	−0.250	+2.932	+3.584	−1.636	+3.58	−0.052	+2.126	−1.536	+0.358	−2.162
Ahmad Henderson II	1,221	736	62.4%	+2.560	+3.570	+1.044	+2.174	−5.410	−3.088	−2.338	−1.464	−2.526	+0.460	+2.734
Modestas Kancleris	967	990	49.4%	+6.476	+3.168	−3.368	+0.656	+2.272	−1.166	−2.140	−1.668	+3.482	−1.822	−4.474
Saša Ciani	859	1,098	43.9%	−7.426	−13.26	−5.878	−7.24	+3.078	+2.912	−1.642	−0.758	+2.272	+0.966	−8.990
Ethan Pickett	832	1,125	42.5%	+3.564	+4.676	+1.044	+3.786	+0.456	+0.836	−1.842	+1.730	−0.644	+0.968	−3.668
Koby Jeffries	298	1,660	15.2%	−9.720	−4.528	+5.222	−2.724	+5.592	+4.06	+6.182	+1.334	+2.374	−1.428	+10.86
Joshua Aaron Reaves	178	1,779	9.1%	−12.314	+6.784	+19.10	+4.490	−3.322	−2.078	−6.518	+9.10	−10.02	+4.196	+35.60

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jordan Mason	1,414	543	72.3%	-1.246	109.952	111.140	49.7%40	34.4%64	17.2%46	37.6%70	51.4%46	66.8%42	16.1%42	30.5%46
Filip Skobalj	1,401	557	71.6%	2.452	111.054	108.646	51.9%52	32.7%58	17.3%44	34.2%62	50.9%50	68.4%48	16.8%46	30.5%46
Tyem Freeman	1,349	608	68.9%	-3.042	108.648	111.738	50.3%46	33.6%62	18.3%38	36.4%68	51.5%46	67.0%42	15.9%42	32.3%42
Javon Jackson	1,241	716	63.4%	-2.642	109.650	112.236	52.4%54	33.0%58	19.4%30	35.2%64	52.4%42	66.6%38	16.5%46	30.9%44
Ahmad Henderson II	1,221	736	62.4%	-0.546	111.054	111.538	51.9%52	31.5%52	17.0%46	34.3%62	51.1%48	66.3%38	16.6%46	32.7%40
Modestas Kancleris	967	990	49.4%	1.750	111.254	109.544	51.4%50	34.7%66	17.6%42	34.1%62	50.8%50	68.9%50	15.5%38	29.5%48
Saša Ciani	859	1,098	43.9%	-5.638	102.334	107.948	47.0%30	35.2%68	19.8%26	34.3%62	51.2%48	68.4%48	16.9%48	26.7%58
Ethan Pickett	832	1,125	42.5%	0.648	112.358	111.738	53.2%58	33.9%62	18.6%36	34.1%62	52.5%40	66.8%42	16.9%48	29.6%48
Koby Jeffries	298	1,660	15.2%	-9.730	105.942	115.628	48.8%38	38.3%76	21.5%18	40.3%74	52.7%40	69.1%50	15.2%36	40.9%22
Joshua Aaron Reaves	178	1,779	9.1%	-12.726	115.866	128.510	55.1%66	30.6%50	16.3%52	29.3%48	60.0%14	58.0%14	20.1%70	64.4%4

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jordan Mason	1,414	543	72.3%	-2.144	109.150	111.238	54.7%66	31.4%52	20.6%22	28.6%46	52.1%42	68.4%48	17.0%50	34.8%34
Filip Skobalj	1,401	557	71.6%	-10.930	106.442	117.326	48.8%38	35.7%70	20.1%24	37.5%68	53.3%36	64.3%30	15.5%38	34.4%36
Tyem Freeman	1,349	608	68.9%	2.150	112.156	110.042	52.7%56	33.7%62	17.8%42	32.5%58	51.8%44	67.6%44	17.5%52	30.3%46
Javon Jackson	1,241	716	63.4%	0.548	109.852	109.344	48.9%38	34.6%64	15.9%56	35.2%64	50.2%50	68.1%46	16.2%42	33.0%38
Ahmad Henderson II	1,221	736	62.4%	-3.042	107.546	110.540	49.8%40	37.0%74	20.0%26	36.6%68	52.4%40	68.8%50	16.1%42	30.0%48
Modestas Kancleris	967	990	49.4%	-4.640	108.248	112.834	50.8%46	32.5%56	18.7%34	36.2%66	52.4%40	65.5%36	17.3%52	33.9%38
Saša Ciani	859	1,098	43.9%	1.850	115.566	113.732	54.3%62	32.2%56	16.8%48	35.9%66	51.9%44	66.2%38	16.0%42	35.6%32
Ethan Pickett	832	1,125	42.5%	-2.942	107.846	110.740	49.5%40	33.4%62	17.8%40	35.9%66	50.9%50	67.5%42	16.0%42	33.2%38
Koby Jeffries	298	1,660	15.2%	0.146	110.452	110.342	51.5%50	32.8%58	17.5%42	34.3%62	51.4%46	66.8%42	16.6%46	30.0%46
Joshua Aaron Reaves	178	1,779	9.1%	-0.446	109.150	109.444	50.7%46	33.9%62	18.3%36	35.8%66	50.9%50	68.0%46	16.0%42	28.9%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Illinois ChicagoUIC15-14

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Illinois Chicago15-14