Poss1,799
Net Rtg-8.032
ORtg106.940
DRtg114.932
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,799 | 876 | -8.032 | 106.940 | 114.932 | 50.3%42 | 32.5%60 | 17.3%36 | 33.5%52 | 54.1%36 | 68.1%40 | 15.6%46 | 41.7%26 |
| WoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieGloverM. GloverBaileyD. BaileyPykeJ. Pyke | 222 | 118 | -29.910 | 85.98 | 115.830 | 43.0%14 | 26.8%38 | 20.7%18 | 27.4%34 | 58.2%20 | 71.1%54 | 15.8%48 | 35.3%40 |
| WoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyPykeJ. PykeRoweL. Rowe | 126 | 63 | 5.856 | 122.778 | 116.928 | 53.6%56 | 35.1%70 | 10.3%86 | 22.2%20 | 54.6%34 | 73.3%66 | 9.5%10 | 25.9%66 |
| BettisL. BettisWoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyRoweL. Rowe | 116 | 69 | -0.344 | 110.550 | 110.842 | 53.9%58 | 26.3%34 | 13.8%66 | 26.5%32 | 51.3%48 | 68.2%42 | 14.9%40 | 18.4%86 |
| WoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyPykeJ. PykeWilliamsJ. Williams | 97 | 42 | 15.772 | 115.562 | 99.868 | 50.0%36 | 39.6%84 | 16.5%44 | 48.2%80 | 47.8%66 | 76.1%74 | 17.9%64 | 50.0%14 |
| BettisL. BettisWoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyTomicM. Tomic | 91 | 53 | 21.280 | 116.666 | 95.476 | 53.8%56 | 35.7%72 | 16.5%44 | 31.6%46 | 42.8%84 | 63.0%22 | 19.1%72 | 33.7%44 |
| BettisL. BettisWoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieGloverM. GloverBaileyD. Bailey | 80 | 38 | -2.740 | 101.528 | 104.258 | 48.4%32 | 27.9%42 | 18.8%28 | 46.0%76 | 45.3%74 | 76.2%76 | 11.9%20 | 42.2%26 |
| WoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyRoweL. RoweMannE. Mann | 69 | 34 | -16.620 | 95.518 | 112.138 | 54.5%60 | 29.4%48 | 24.6%6 | 27.3%34 | 57.3%24 | 71.4%56 | 18.7%68 | 20.0%84 |
| StaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyPykeJ. PykeRoweL. RoweMannE. Mann | 51 | 24 | -38.56 | 105.536 | 144.12 | 60.8%84 | 23.8%26 | 25.4%4 | 35.1%54 | 70.7%2 | 66.7%32 | 10.0%12 | 51.2%14 |
| WoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieBaileyD. BaileyPykeJ. PykeTomicM. Tomic | 49 | 22 | -19.318 | 114.660 | 133.86 | 48.7%34 | 32.0%58 | 14.3%62 | 65.8%94 | 60.0%16 | 76.2%76 | 8.5%8 | 42.5%24 |
| StaveskieT. StaveskieGloverM. GloverBaileyD. BaileyPykeJ. PykeReedeH. Reede | 47 | 21 | -18.918 | 105.036 | 123.916 | 57.4%74 | 35.0%68 | 27.9%2 | 41.2%68 | 51.7%48 | 61.1%18 | 12.4%24 | 86.7%0 |
| WoodsH. WoodsStaveskieT. StaveskieGloverM. GloverBaileyD. BaileyMannE. Mann | 46 | 22 | -6.734 | 107.242 | 113.934 | 51.2%44 | 36.0%72 | 19.7%22 | 30.0%42 | 55.3%30 | 69.6%48 | 17.5%60 | 36.8%36 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.