Incarnate Word9-19

SouthlandCoach: Shane Heirman

9-19NET#267

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Davion Bailey	1,628	171	90.5%	−9.718	−11.18	−1.458	−7.14	−5.112	−0.964	+9.292	+2.522	+8.7100	−2.712	+2.734
Tahj Staveskie	1,615	184	89.8%	+6.676	−5.522	−12.094	−0.150	−9.52	−3.190	+1.862	−7.296	+3.886	−1.526	−5.076
Harold Woods	1,364	435	75.8%	+2.862	+0.554	−2.262	+1.264	+1.162	+1.624	−0.748	+1.334	+1.970	+1.070	−23.798
Jordan Pyke	1,017	782	56.5%	−4.334	−1.144	+3.230	−1.138	−0.448	+0.442	−1.742	+0.642	+2.980	−3.38	+6.416
Love Bettis	712	1,087	39.6%	+10.186	+7.888	−2.362	+2.072	−1.636	−3.692	+3.068	−1.870	−4.016	+2.790	+2.436
Marcus Glover	706	1,093	39.2%	−7.724	−5.922	+1.838	+0.354	−0.448	+4.82	+5.580	+0.840	−0.050	−0.050	+10.46
Lewis Rowe	559	1,240	31.1%	+8.480	+4.776	−3.770	+5.794	−3.620	−1.370	−12.44	+0.050	+3.684	−0.836	−18.798
Esteban Mann	383	1,416	21.3%	−14.810	−12.76	+2.136	−5.010	+1.364	+3.28	−1.046	+0.544	−0.150	−0.836	−6.882
Harrison Reede	320	1,479	17.8%	−1.944	+9.092	+10.96	+4.188	+1.264	−0.658	−1.840	+5.08	−6.18	+1.880	+21.80
Jayden Williams	270	1,529	15.0%	+2.260	+1.458	−0.854	−3.716	+8.298	−1.270	+5.178	−1.060	−2.030	+2.284	+7.014
Mihael Tomic	269	1,531	14.9%	+4.368	+2.666	−1.758	−2.128	+2.374	−1.168	+1.258	−1.970	−5.58	+2.184	+4.724
Amani Drummond	118	1,681	6.6%	+18.098	+7.988	−10.192	−2.724	+6.294	−5.096	−3.732	−7.196	−3.122	+0.662	+11.06

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Davion Bailey	1,628	171	90.5%	-8.930	105.838	114.832	49.6%36	32.1%60	17.3%38	34.4%54	54.4%34	69.1%46	15.4%44	42.0%26
Tahj Staveskie	1,615	184	89.8%	-7.334	106.338	113.634	50.3%42	31.6%58	17.0%40	33.7%52	53.4%40	68.5%42	15.5%44	41.2%28
Harold Woods	1,364	435	75.8%	-7.434	107.040	114.434	50.6%42	32.8%62	17.7%34	33.3%50	54.4%34	68.5%44	15.9%48	36.5%38
Jordan Pyke	1,017	782	56.5%	-9.930	106.440	116.328	49.8%36	32.3%60	17.5%36	32.7%48	54.4%34	69.4%46	14.2%36	44.5%20
Love Bettis	712	1,087	39.6%	-1.942	111.652	113.536	51.5%46	31.5%56	15.2%54	35.3%56	53.0%40	65.7%32	17.3%58	43.1%24
Marcus Glover	706	1,093	39.2%	-12.726	103.332	116.030	50.4%42	32.2%60	20.3%20	36.9%60	54.6%34	68.1%40	15.6%46	48.1%16
Lewis Rowe	559	1,240	31.1%	-2.242	110.148	112.338	54.2%58	30.0%50	16.4%44	25.0%26	54.1%36	70.6%52	15.1%42	29.0%58
Esteban Mann	383	1,416	21.3%	-19.618	96.920	116.628	46.3%24	33.5%66	19.9%22	32.7%48	54.5%34	68.0%40	15.0%42	36.4%38
Harrison Reede	320	1,479	17.8%	-9.630	114.360	123.916	53.6%56	33.5%66	16.9%40	32.0%46	58.3%20	63.0%22	17.1%58	59.9%6
Jayden Williams	270	1,529	15.0%	-6.134	108.144	114.234	47.1%28	39.5%84	16.3%46	37.8%60	53.2%40	66.4%32	17.5%60	47.7%16
Mihael Tomic	269	1,531	14.9%	-4.438	109.146	113.536	48.5%32	34.5%68	16.4%44	34.5%54	52.5%42	63.4%24	17.5%60	45.7%18
Amani Drummond	118	1,681	6.6%	8.760	114.360	105.554	47.8%30	38.2%80	12.7%72	30.1%42	47.5%66	65.2%30	16.2%50	52.0%12

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Davion Bailey	1,628	171	90.5%	0.846	116.966	116.230	56.6%70	37.2%76	18.1%32	25.2%28	51.9%46	60.4%16	18.1%64	39.2%32
Tahj Staveskie	1,615	184	89.8%	-13.824	111.852	125.614	50.3%42	41.1%88	20.1%20	31.9%46	60.6%14	64.6%28	17.0%56	46.2%18
Harold Woods	1,364	435	75.8%	-10.130	106.540	116.628	49.3%36	31.7%58	16.1%46	34.0%52	53.1%40	66.7%32	14.9%40	60.2%6
Jordan Pyke	1,017	782	56.5%	-5.636	107.542	113.136	50.9%44	32.8%62	17.1%38	34.5%54	53.8%38	66.5%32	17.5%60	38.1%34
Love Bettis	712	1,087	39.6%	-12.026	103.834	115.930	49.5%36	33.1%62	18.8%28	32.3%48	54.9%32	69.7%48	14.5%38	40.7%28
Marcus Glover	706	1,093	39.2%	-5.038	109.246	114.234	50.2%42	32.7%62	15.5%52	31.4%46	53.8%38	68.1%40	15.7%46	37.8%34
Lewis Rowe	559	1,240	31.1%	-10.628	105.436	116.030	48.4%32	33.6%66	17.7%34	37.4%60	54.1%36	67.0%38	15.9%48	47.7%16
Esteban Mann	383	1,416	21.3%	-4.938	109.648	114.434	51.3%44	32.2%60	16.7%42	33.7%52	54.0%36	68.1%40	15.8%48	43.2%24
Harrison Reede	320	1,479	17.8%	-7.732	105.336	113.036	49.5%36	32.3%60	17.4%36	33.8%52	53.3%40	69.1%46	15.3%44	38.1%34
Jayden Williams	270	1,529	15.0%	-8.432	106.740	115.032	50.8%42	31.2%54	17.5%36	32.7%48	54.3%34	68.4%42	15.3%44	40.7%28
Mihael Tomic	269	1,531	14.9%	-8.732	106.540	115.232	50.6%42	32.2%60	17.5%36	33.3%50	54.4%34	69.0%44	15.3%44	41.0%28
Amani Drummond	118	1,681	6.6%	-9.230	106.440	115.630	50.5%42	32.1%60	17.7%34	33.8%52	54.6%34	68.4%42	15.6%46	40.9%28

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Incarnate WordUIW9-19

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Incarnate Word9-19