Lipscomb18-12

ASUNCoach: Lennie Acuff

18-12NET#166

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joe Anderson	1,254	234	84.3%	+8.380	+19.0100	+10.76	+6.296	−0.844	−6.598	+1.258	+5.86	+1.464	−1.726	+3.530
Will Pruitt	1,169	318	78.6%	−14.610	−6.320	+8.312	−4.712	+4.888	+3.012	+6.384	+0.346	−6.38	−1.330	+4.128
Owen McCormack	946	542	63.6%	−17.18	−4.926	+12.24	−3.220	−4.018	−2.278	−15.82	+5.48	−2.726	−2.814	−5.678
Derrin Boyd	751	737	50.5%	−9.820	−5.026	+4.824	−0.150	−5.710	+0.540	−0.548	+2.326	−4.514	+1.878	−1.356
Cody Head	578	910	38.8%	+1.656	−1.344	−3.064	−0.546	−5.212	−1.672	−0.152	−2.574	−2.232	+0.254	+1.738
Grant Asman	490	998	32.9%	+10.884	+3.568	−7.382	+3.584	+1.868	+1.626	−1.046	−0.554	−0.250	+4.396	−5.074
Dylan Faulkner	366	1,121	24.6%	+8.380	−4.328	−12.794	−1.536	+3.680	+3.410	+7.888	−8.196	+3.180	−2.020	+0.048
Rylan Houck	193	1,295	13.0%	+28.1100	+16.8100	−11.392	+5.594	+10.7100	−0.760	+20.1100	−6.794	+12.8100	−2.220	+13.14
TJ Johnson	134	1,354	9.0%	−8.622	−11.88	−3.266	−4.612	+5.288	+4.46	−4.328	+4.710	+9.6100	+2.382	−0.652

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joe Anderson	1,254	234	84.3%	9.362	119.174	109.842	58.0%80	24.2%24	13.6%70	27.0%42	53.9%32	70.5%56	17.0%50	23.8%66
Will Pruitt	1,169	318	78.6%	4.856	114.864	110.040	56.1%72	25.3%28	15.3%58	28.2%46	53.0%36	68.9%50	16.9%50	24.1%64
Owen McCormack	946	542	63.6%	1.750	114.364	112.634	56.0%72	23.0%22	13.9%68	21.3%26	54.8%28	69.2%52	16.2%44	21.3%74
Derrin Boyd	751	737	50.5%	3.152	113.662	110.540	57.0%76	21.5%18	14.9%62	26.6%40	54.1%32	68.0%46	18.1%58	22.7%70
Cody Head	578	910	38.8%	8.962	115.366	106.450	56.8%74	21.2%16	13.7%70	26.8%40	51.4%44	68.9%50	17.3%52	24.3%64
Grant Asman	490	998	32.9%	15.272	118.472	103.258	59.5%84	25.6%30	15.7%54	26.1%38	52.6%38	70.1%56	20.1%70	19.9%78
Dylan Faulkner	366	1,121	24.6%	14.270	112.860	98.670	56.0%72	27.1%34	17.2%44	32.8%58	46.9%66	72.5%66	15.7%42	23.3%68
Rylan Houck	193	1,295	13.0%	32.490	130.790	98.370	61.9%90	33.7%64	14.0%68	44.4%82	47.0%66	81.5%92	15.3%40	34.9%32
TJ Johnson	134	1,354	9.0%	0.146	105.342	105.354	53.0%58	28.9%42	18.7%34	22.9%30	57.3%20	79.0%88	19.3%66	22.7%70

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joe Anderson	1,254	234	84.3%	1.048	100.130	99.168	51.8%54	25.0%26	20.1%26	25.8%38	48.1%60	69.0%50	18.6%62	20.3%76
Will Pruitt	1,169	318	78.6%	19.478	121.178	101.762	60.8%86	20.6%16	12.3%78	21.9%26	52.7%38	75.2%78	18.2%60	20.1%76
Owen McCormack	946	542	63.6%	18.878	119.274	100.466	59.2%84	27.0%34	16.1%52	37.2%68	49.5%54	71.9%64	19.0%64	27.0%56
Derrin Boyd	751	737	50.5%	12.968	118.674	105.752	57.2%76	27.1%36	14.4%66	27.1%42	51.8%42	72.5%66	16.3%46	23.9%66
Cody Head	578	910	38.8%	7.360	116.670	109.342	57.3%78	26.4%32	15.3%58	26.9%40	53.9%32	71.1%60	17.1%52	22.6%70
Grant Asman	490	998	32.9%	4.454	115.064	110.540	55.9%72	23.8%24	14.1%68	27.2%42	53.1%36	70.3%56	15.8%42	24.9%62
Dylan Faulkner	366	1,121	24.6%	5.956	117.270	111.338	57.5%78	23.5%22	13.8%70	25.0%36	55.0%28	69.3%52	17.7%56	23.3%68
Rylan Houck	193	1,295	13.0%	4.354	113.962	109.642	56.4%74	23.1%22	14.8%62	24.3%34	53.7%34	68.7%48	17.5%54	21.8%72
TJ Johnson	134	1,354	9.0%	8.762	117.270	108.546	57.5%78	23.8%24	14.3%66	27.2%42	52.6%38	69.5%52	17.0%50	23.3%68

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.