Lipscomb23-10

ASUNCoach: Lennie Acuff

23-10NET#81

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jacob Ognacevic	1,887	312	85.8%	+6.074	+17.4100	+11.44	+7.6100	−1.836	−5.398	+4.174	+4.610	−1.140	−4.06	−2.362
Will Pruitt	1,827	373	83.1%	+5.874	+8.388	+2.536	+4.992	−5.212	−2.786	+4.978	+3.616	−0.546	+0.356	−7.986
Joe Anderson	1,808	392	82.2%	−4.036	+13.998	+17.90	+6.498	−4.614	−6.098	−7.514	+6.44	−7.64	−3.210	−2.764
Gyasi Powell	1,761	439	80.0%	−3.836	+8.088	+11.84	+4.290	−4.416	−3.894	+5.180	+5.18	+0.556	−4.92	−4.272
Charlie Williams	936	1,264	42.6%	+9.284	+5.378	−3.870	+3.282	−5.012	−0.964	−0.548	−0.858	+3.784	−2.316	−8.088
Miles White	735	1,465	33.4%	−9.120	−13.96	−4.874	−6.86	−1.242	+0.638	−7.314	−3.584	+1.262	+0.458	+9.68
Grant Asman	604	1,596	27.5%	−7.524	−6.520	+0.944	−2.030	+4.486	+4.34	−3.532	+1.236	−1.338	+5.7100	+5.818
Dylan Faulkner	388	1,811	17.7%	+0.152	−7.118	−7.284	−1.338	+1.160	+1.922	−5.622	−5.292	−6.38	+2.284	−4.574
Kellan Boylan	355	1,845	16.1%	−6.328	−9.112	−2.864	−7.04	+4.888	+3.38	+13.598	+0.544	+5.292	+0.154	+1.540
Logan Suber	342	1,857	15.6%	−2.940	−19.52	−16.698	−8.92	+4.588	+6.20	+3.170	−4.588	+7.598	+5.098	+5.420
Rylan Houck	153	2,046	7.0%	−1.544	−2.836	−1.356	−1.832	+3.280	−0.660	−10.56	+0.740	+3.280	−0.346	+4.524
Ross Candelino	135	2,064	6.2%	+15.494	+15.5100	+0.148	+3.988	+9.5100	+0.640	+10.994	−4.890	−4.712	−0.740	+5.918

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jacob Ognacevic	1,887	312	85.8%	13.970	118.072	104.156	56.7%74	24.7%26	14.2%68	31.5%54	49.6%56	71.6%62	15.5%38	21.7%72
Will Pruitt	1,827	373	83.1%	14.170	116.968	102.960	56.5%72	23.9%24	14.5%66	31.8%56	49.5%56	71.7%62	16.2%44	20.7%76
Joe Anderson	1,808	392	82.2%	12.368	118.072	105.754	56.7%74	24.1%24	13.9%70	29.7%48	50.0%50	70.3%56	15.5%38	21.6%74
Gyasi Powell	1,761	439	80.0%	12.368	117.168	104.856	56.4%72	24.0%24	14.2%68	32.0%56	49.9%54	71.8%64	15.2%36	21.2%74
Charlie Williams	936	1,264	42.6%	18.378	118.672	100.268	57.5%76	22.0%18	14.4%66	30.7%52	48.5%60	73.8%72	14.8%34	17.6%84
Miles White	735	1,465	33.4%	7.060	106.342	99.268	51.1%48	24.2%24	15.4%60	26.1%38	46.5%68	72.5%66	16.4%44	28.6%52
Grant Asman	604	1,596	27.5%	7.760	110.854	103.160	54.1%62	28.1%40	18.0%40	28.4%44	49.8%54	70.7%58	20.2%72	26.4%58
Dylan Faulkner	388	1,811	17.7%	13.268	109.752	96.574	54.5%64	25.8%30	16.5%50	26.4%38	44.7%76	66.7%38	17.9%56	18.4%82
Kellan Boylan	355	1,845	16.1%	7.860	107.946	100.168	49.7%40	28.9%42	17.7%42	42.4%78	49.4%56	76.1%80	16.2%44	23.3%68
Logan Suber	342	1,857	15.6%	10.664	99.126	88.586	48.1%34	28.6%42	20.2%24	33.6%60	45.1%74	78.1%86	20.3%72	26.7%58
Rylan Houck	153	2,046	7.0%	11.766	112.958	101.264	53.9%62	27.9%38	14.4%66	21.3%24	49.6%56	74.7%74	15.8%40	26.3%58
Ross Candelino	135	2,064	6.2%	27.686	130.190	102.562	59.2%82	33.8%62	15.5%58	41.2%76	44.5%76	67.4%42	15.5%38	27.6%56

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jacob Ognacevic	1,887	312	85.8%	7.960	100.630	92.780	49.0%38	26.5%32	19.5%28	27.5%42	45.0%74	72.7%66	19.6%68	24.1%66
Will Pruitt	1,827	373	83.1%	8.362	108.648	100.466	51.5%50	29.1%44	17.2%46	26.9%40	46.0%70	72.1%64	15.8%40	28.6%52
Joe Anderson	1,808	392	82.2%	16.374	104.138	87.888	50.3%46	28.6%42	19.9%26	37.2%68	43.6%80	77.9%86	18.7%62	24.3%66
Gyasi Powell	1,761	439	80.0%	16.274	109.150	93.080	52.3%54	28.4%40	18.0%40	26.9%40	44.8%76	71.4%60	20.0%70	25.5%62
Charlie Williams	936	1,264	42.6%	9.262	113.260	104.156	54.2%62	27.0%34	15.4%60	31.2%54	49.3%56	70.1%56	17.1%50	25.5%62
Miles White	735	1,465	33.4%	16.274	120.276	104.058	57.9%78	25.4%28	14.7%64	33.5%60	50.1%50	71.3%60	16.0%42	19.0%80
Grant Asman	604	1,596	27.5%	15.172	117.370	102.262	56.1%72	23.7%22	13.8%70	31.9%56	48.6%58	72.1%64	14.5%32	20.5%76
Dylan Faulkner	388	1,811	17.7%	13.168	116.868	103.758	55.8%70	24.8%26	14.6%66	32.0%56	49.9%54	73.0%68	15.7%40	22.9%70
Kellan Boylan	355	1,845	16.1%	14.170	117.068	102.960	56.7%74	24.1%24	14.4%66	28.9%46	48.9%58	70.9%60	16.1%42	21.8%72
Logan Suber	342	1,857	15.6%	13.570	118.572	105.154	56.9%74	24.1%24	14.0%70	30.5%52	49.6%56	70.5%56	15.3%36	21.3%74
Rylan Houck	153	2,046	7.0%	13.268	115.766	102.562	55.7%70	24.7%26	15.0%62	31.8%54	48.9%58	71.5%62	16.1%42	21.7%72
Ross Candelino	135	2,064	6.2%	12.168	114.662	102.462	55.4%68	24.4%26	14.9%62	30.3%50	49.2%56	72.1%64	16.2%42	21.7%74

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.