Poss1,927
Net Rtg5.154
ORtg116.464
DRtg111.440
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,927 | 912 | 5.154 | 116.464 | 111.440 | 53.7%56 | 33.3%66 | 15.3%54 | 40.0%66 | 52.0%44 | 67.1%38 | 16.9%56 | 29.7%56 |
| MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. ShouldersPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 319 | 155 | 8.860 | 121.776 | 112.936 | 55.3%64 | 34.2%66 | 14.1%62 | 39.5%64 | 50.0%58 | 59.3%14 | 17.7%62 | 30.5%54 |
| Cuffe Jr.K. Cuffe Jr.MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. Shoulders | 255 | 128 | 4.354 | 119.872 | 115.530 | 53.7%56 | 37.8%78 | 16.5%44 | 43.5%72 | 57.3%24 | 77.1%78 | 13.2%28 | 15.9%90 |
| MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. Shoulders | 173 | 81 | 3.452 | 112.554 | 109.046 | 53.2%54 | 30.5%52 | 16.2%46 | 42.6%70 | 49.0%60 | 68.8%44 | 14.7%40 | 41.0%28 |
| MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. WilliamsPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 102 | 49 | 23.882 | 113.458 | 89.686 | 51.9%48 | 28.6%46 | 15.6%50 | 63.6%94 | 39.0%92 | 74.5%68 | 20.7%78 | 48.1%16 |
| OkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. ShouldersPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 83 | 37 | -5.136 | 103.132 | 108.248 | 42.8%14 | 23.5%24 | 9.6%88 | 31.6%46 | 49.3%58 | 73.3%66 | 12.4%24 | 33.8%44 |
| GrossT. GrossMightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. Shoulders | 83 | 36 | 25.884 | 121.476 | 95.576 | 51.6%46 | 42.1%90 | 15.6%50 | 82.3%98 | 42.8%84 | 68.0%40 | 16.1%50 | 21.1%80 |
| Cuffe Jr.K. Cuffe Jr.MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenShouldersB. Shoulders | 46 | 18 | 51.998 | 124.080 | 72.198 | 66.1%94 | 20.0%14 | 17.4%36 | 67.7%96 | 33.3%96 | 78.6%82 | 19.7%74 | 20.5%82 |
| Cuffe Jr.K. Cuffe Jr.MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. Williams | 45 | 25 | 36.994 | 139.096 | 102.164 | 65.6%94 | 40.9%86 | 13.2%68 | 15.6%8 | 39.3%92 | 70.0%48 | 10.6%14 | 45.2%20 |
| Cuffe Jr.K. Cuffe Jr.OkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. Shoulders | 45 | 22 | -11.228 | 129.888 | 141.02 | 57.3%72 | 31.8%58 | 11.2%82 | 29.3%40 | 77.5%0 | 75.0%70 | 14.5%38 | 27.5%62 |
| GrossT. GrossOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. WilliamsShouldersB. Shoulders | 39 | 16 | 13.568 | 90.312 | 76.896 | 39.2%8 | 30.4%52 | 10.3%86 | 27.0%34 | 41.4%86 | 71.4%56 | 28.8%98 | 48.3%16 |
| GrossT. GrossMightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 35 | 17 | 5.054 | 124.180 | 119.124 | 57.1%72 | 57.1%100 | 23.1%8 | 50.0%82 | 69.2%2 | 84.6%94 | 18.8%70 | 15.4%90 |
| MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenShouldersB. ShouldersPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 34 | 13 | 41.296 | 131.390 | 90.186 | 60.9%84 | 35.3%70 | 11.7%78 | 28.1%36 | 46.0%72 | 77.8%80 | 24.0%90 | 36.0%38 |
| GrossT. GrossOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenShouldersB. ShouldersPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 34 | 16 | -53.02 | 91.714 | 144.72 | 44.6%20 | 33.3%66 | 23.7%8 | 28.6%38 | 79.3%0 | 58.3%12 | 23.3%88 | 41.4%26 |
| Cuffe Jr.K. Cuffe Jr.MightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieShouldersB. ShouldersPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 34 | 16 | -15.822 | 115.762 | 131.58 | 57.4%74 | 33.3%66 | 17.8%34 | 44.4%74 | 59.4%16 | 52.9%6 | 19.6%74 | 31.3%52 |
| GrossT. GrossMightyA. MightyOkojieB. OkojieServenC. ServenWilliamsZ. Williams | 33 | 14 | -53.92 | 99.826 | 153.70 | 43.5%16 | 25.0%28 | 18.1%32 | 73.9%98 | 73.1%0 | 58.3%12 | 13.7%32 | 34.6%42 |
| GrossT. GrossCuffe Jr.K. Cuffe Jr.MightyA. MightyServenC. ServenPerkins IIQ. Perkins II | 30 | 16 | 26.284 | 155.5100 | 129.310 | 66.1%94 | 35.3%70 | 0.0%100 | 35.5%56 | 54.8%32 | 62.5%20 | 6.8%4 | 16.1%90 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

