Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Montana logoMontana logoMontana logoMontana logo

Montana21-12

Big SkyCoach: Travis DeCuire

21-12NET#149

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Aanen Moody+10.084+18.9100+8.910+9.9100−3.026−4.494−8.912+5.08−0.150−0.838−11.492
Brandon Whitney+14.992+9.290−5.678+6.898−6.38−1.774+5.782−0.352−1.338+1.574−17.498
Dischon Thomas−1.446−1.840−0.552+0.656−2.530+1.328−3.334+1.138−1.042+2.686+1.042
Josh Vazquez+21.498+11.494−10.190+5.894−1.340−3.288−4.626−4.286+2.674+0.966−2.866
Laolu Oke+14.392+11.996−2.562+3.584+10.0100+0.934+5.782−0.354−1.538+0.762−6.280
Te'Jon Sawyer−6.928−7.118−0.250−1.436−7.16−1.470−9.410+0.544+2.876−0.346−1.658
Giordan Williams−18.46−13.76+4.726−8.04−1.538+0.048−1.046+3.020−0.348+0.458+0.944
Jaxon Nap−4.534−5.722−1.256−3.022+0.758+1.032+4.476−2.978+0.354−1.134+7.116
Chase Henderson−16.18−8.814+7.314−3.518+3.882+5.32+6.684+2.128−1.934−0.640+16.72
Money Williams−4.734−8.714−4.070−6.66+0.858−0.760+4.174−1.968+4.588−0.938+9.38
Blake Jones−13.612−3.832+9.88−3.220+6.894+1.920−4.726−2.674−4.812−6.42+13.64

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Aanen Moody4.856117.070112.23656.2%7226.6%3414.6%6427.4%4251.5%4469.9%5414.3%3232.3%38
Brandon Whitney6.358116.068109.74256.2%7225.7%3015.0%6029.9%5050.7%4869.7%5414.7%3430.7%44
Dischon Thomas3.052113.762110.74054.9%6826.4%3215.7%5627.7%4451.1%4669.6%5415.2%3834.3%34
Josh Vazquez10.064117.772107.74656.5%7426.7%3414.3%6627.3%4249.5%5470.8%5814.7%3433.1%36
Laolu Oke9.964119.776109.74256.3%7431.8%5415.7%5431.3%5450.6%4869.3%5214.7%3431.2%42
Te'Jon Sawyer-0.746110.052110.73853.9%6422.8%2014.4%6423.1%3051.1%4671.6%6214.2%3233.0%36
Giordan Williams-9.032105.040114.03249.4%4226.2%3215.3%5828.0%4452.8%3869.7%5414.7%3434.6%32
Jaxon Nap-0.146109.852109.94052.4%5627.7%3816.1%5232.1%5648.5%5870.2%5613.6%2639.4%22
Chase Henderson-10.330106.844117.12651.8%5430.4%4819.8%2834.3%6252.5%4068.4%4813.9%3048.2%12
Money Williams-0.746106.644107.34849.0%4027.8%3814.7%6232.3%5649.1%5673.9%7213.6%2842.2%18
Blake Jones-8.732110.854119.52052.0%5433.1%5817.0%4624.6%3448.5%5865.8%368.7%845.9%14

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Aanen Moody-5.23898.126103.35846.3%3029.6%4619.0%3236.3%6646.5%6870.1%5415.1%3843.7%16
Brandon Whitney-8.632106.844115.42849.4%4232.1%5616.7%4824.2%3451.0%4671.0%6013.2%2448.2%12
Dischon Thomas4.354115.566111.23854.3%6628.9%4214.4%6631.0%5450.0%5470.7%5812.6%2233.3%36
Josh Vazquez-11.428106.444117.82450.7%4828.0%4017.5%4231.9%5653.7%3468.2%4813.8%2835.9%30
Laolu Oke-4.440107.848112.23652.9%5821.8%1814.8%6225.6%3850.9%4670.8%5814.0%3037.4%26
Te'Jon Sawyer6.158117.170110.93855.3%7030.0%4615.9%5432.5%5850.6%4868.9%5014.5%3434.6%32
Giordan Williams9.464118.774109.24457.4%7827.7%3815.3%5829.0%4849.8%5470.1%5414.3%3233.7%34
Jaxon Nap4.454115.566111.13855.4%7027.0%3415.1%6027.7%4451.4%4469.9%5414.7%3432.3%38
Chase Henderson5.856115.666109.74255.3%6826.5%3214.5%6427.7%4450.5%4870.3%5614.5%3231.5%42
Money Williams4.054115.366111.33855.6%7027.0%3415.4%5828.1%4651.0%4669.4%5214.5%3232.9%38
Blake Jones5.056114.664109.74255.1%6826.3%3215.1%6029.3%4851.1%4670.6%5815.2%3832.3%38
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.