Schedule
L
WL
W
L
L
W
L
L
WL
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
LLLLLLL
L
WLWLLWLLWLWLLLLWLLWWLLLLLLLLLTeam Stats
28 games- Net Rating-14.610
- Offensive Rating116.468
- Defensive Rating131.012
- Pace57.632
- Effective FG%48.5%45
- Off Rebound Pct24.7%6
- Turnover Pct21.3%44
- FT Attempt Rate38.6%64
Team Stats
28 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-14.610
- Offensive Rating116.468
- Defensive Rating131.012
- Pace57.632
- Effective FG%48.5%45
- Off Rebound Pct24.7%6
- Turnover Pct21.3%44
- FT Attempt Rate38.6%64
Results & Margin
- Win Pct21.4%6
- Point Margin / Game-8.49
- Points / Game67.151
- Points Allowed / Game75.54
- 1st Half Margin-3.022
- 2nd Half Margin-5.54
- Avg Largest Lead––
- Avg Largest Deficit––
Box Score
- Points / Game67.151
- Rebounds / Game31.721
- Assists / Game11.837
- ORebs / Game8.612
- DRebs / Game23.144
- Steals / Game5.944
- Blocks / Game3.038
- Turnovers / Game12.355
- PFs / Game21.54
Shooting
- FGMs / Game23.453
- FGAs / Game54.556
- Field Goal Pct43.0%46
- 2PMs / Game17.462
- 2PAs / Game36.357
- 2-Point Pct47.9%55
- 3PMs / Game6.039
- 3PAs / Game18.142
- 3-Point Pct33.1%37
- FTMs / Game14.360
- FTAs / Game21.065
- Free Throw Pct68.0%36
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s51.9%57
- % Pts from 3s26.8%37
- % Pts from FTs21.3%60
- Paint Pts / Game17.351
- % Pts in Paint25.8%51
- Fast Break Pts / Game2.843
- % Pts on Fast Break4.2%42
- Points off TOVs / Game9.244
- % Pts off TOVs13.7%41
- 1st Half Pts / Game30.848
- 2nd Half Pts / Game35.455
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %52.6%44
- Points / Shot1.2350
- 3-Point Att Rate33.3%43
- Assist Pct50.2%34
- Assists / 100 Poss20.443
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.96x44
- PF Drawn / Game18.865
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%53.2%10
- Opp True Shooting %57.7%5
- Opp Field Goal Pct47.4%6
- Opp 2-Point Pct51.2%17
- Opp 3-Point Pct38.6%5
- Opp 3PA Rate29.7%87
- Opp FT Att Rate42.3%20
- Opp Points / Shot1.377
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game75.54
- Paint Pts Allowed19.737
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.032
- Pts off TOVs Allowed9.655
- Opp Assist Pct51.9%58
- TOVs Forced / Game12.552
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct71.0%78
- Turnovers Forced Pct21.6%63
- Steal Pct10.3%50
- Block Pct5.1%38
- Hakeem Pct15.4%43
- PF Efficiency1.14x10
- Steals / PF0.28x17
- Blocks / PF0.14x25
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #81Opp OREB%29.0%
- #92Paint Pts %40.8%
- #107TOV%18.2%
- #110FB Pts %8.0%
- #128FTAR38.6%
- #195eFG%48.5%
- #202TS%52.0%
- #2023PM Diff-9
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
- #81Opp OREB%29.0%
- #92Paint Pts %40.8%
- #107TOV%18.2%
- #110FB Pts %8.0%
- #128FTAR38.6%
- #195eFG%48.5%
- #202TS%52.0%
- #2023PM Diff-9
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
- #336Opp 3P%38.6%
- #329OREB%24.7%
- #319Opp eFG%53.2%
- #316Adj DRtg109.5
- #313Pts Diff-236
- #293REB Diff-113
- #281Adj ORtg97.2
- #233AST%50.2%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2014-15- 1Southern UtahSUU 2017-1811-19Big SkyMost alike in eFG%, OREB%, TOV%91
- 2Idaho St. 2015-1614-15Big SkyMost alike in Opp TOV%, Adj O, FT rate90
- 3
Bowling GreenBGSU 2024-2512-17MACMost alike in FT rate, eFG%, Tempo89 - 4
Cal St. NorthridgeCSUN 2020-218-13Big WestMost alike in Opp eFG%, Tempo, Adj D86 - 5
South DakotaUSD 2013-149-18SummitMost alike in OREB%, eFG%, Adj O85 - 6
USC Upstate 2019-2011-20Big SouthMost alike in FT rate, Opp eFG%, 3PA rate84 - 7
UTSA 2015-164-26C-USAMost alike in Opp OREB%, Opp TOV%, FT rate83 - 8
Cal Poly 2019-205-23Big WestMost alike in Opp TOV%, FT rate, OREB%83 - 9
Denver 2020-211-19SummitMost alike in Tempo, Opp OREB%, eFG%82 - 10
Old DominionODU 2025-2611-21Sun BeltMost alike in Tempo, eFG%, TOV%82
Schedule
Loading the schedule
| Q. HookerQuinton Hooker | So | 6'0" | +0.261 | – | – | 54.3%60 | 22.1%77 | 12.8 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 34.8% | 77.2% |
| L. AntwiLenny Antwi | Sr | 6'1" | -0.144 | – | – | 59.5%81 | 14.8%27 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 41.1% | 82.1% |
| J. NashJaron Nash | Sr | 6'8" | -0.529 | – | – | 52.7%52 | 24.1%86 | 12.4 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 24.4% | 56.9% |
| E. TylerEstan Tyler | Sr | 6'1" | -0.815 | – | – | 56.2%69 | 21.3%72 | 11.0 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 37.0% | 81.9% |
| T. De RouenTerrel De Rouen | Jr | 6'1" | -1.011 | – | – | 46.5%25 | 24.2%86 | 8.8 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 29.8% | 66.1% |
| C. ShanksCarson Shanks | Fr | 7'0" | -1.19 | – | – | 48.5%31 | 21.2%72 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 22.2% | 61.1% |
| C. CalcaterraChad Calcaterra | Sr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 58.1%77 | 16.5%39 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 41.2% |
| S. BentonShane Benton | Jr | 6'2" | – | – | – | 78.7%97 | 9.4%7 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 20.0% | 66.7% |
| R. SalmonsonRyan Salmonson | Sr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 51.8%47 | 18.4%52 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| D. HobaughDustin Hobaugh | Jr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 53.7%57 | 11.8%13 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 37.5% | 69.7% |
| T. BlakeThomas Blake | So | 6'2" | – | – | – | 41.7%15 | 19.9%63 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| B. CashmanBryce Cashman | Fr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 57.8%76 | 13.6%20 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| J. ColemanJosiah Coleman | Jr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 53.4%56 | 19.5%60 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 24.1% | 72.0% |
| K. ShieldsKraig Shields | Fr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 55.3%64 | 12.3%15 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 70.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 18-17 | #280 | -9.122 | 106.836 | 115.916 | -5.227 | -11115 | -1238 | 29.0%30 | -15999 | 50.3%29 | 33.1%36 | 70.4%30 |
| 24-25 | 12-21 | #271 | -9.122 | 107.650 | 116.76 | -2.850 | +9071 | -1734 | 34.1%82 | +1933 | 50.0%31 | 32.6%30 | 70.8%36 |
| 23-24 | 18-14 | #235 | -5.036 | 106.549 | 111.619 | -7.85 | +9075 | +5081 | 31.3%70 | -1958 | 51.2%53 | 32.6%29 | 71.3%42 |
| 22-23 | 13-20 | #281 | -8.720 | 103.035 | 111.713 | -4.124 | -5823 | +8794 | 25.9%24 | +1736 | 51.9%64 | 35.0%62 | 68.3%17 |
| 21-22 | 6-25 | #350 | -19.53 | 98.419 | 117.91 | -5.718 | -2736 | +3170 | 27.0%36 | +6313 | 48.1%23 | 34.5%64 | 73.4%68 |
| 19-20 | 15-18 | #231 | -4.038 | 104.058 | 108.115 | -2.643 | +8369 | +2363 | 25.9%28 | +769 | 52.5%83 | 34.0%61 | 76.1%92 |
| 18-19 | 12-18 | #268 | -6.528 | 99.921 | 106.441 | -4.721 | -4531 | +3775 | 22.9%6 | -250 | 53.2%78 | 37.2%87 | 69.5%40 |
| 17-18 | 12-20 | #243 | -7.826 | 103.837 | 111.616 | 0.062 | -2163 | -1839 | 20.2%2 | -5883 | 52.1%63 | 34.0%35 | 70.6%40 |
| 16-1715 | 22-10 | #155 | 2.461 | 104.452 | 102.168 | -4.721 | +3157 | +1360 | 26.7%22 | -5784 | 54.0%88 | 38.8%91 | 70.8%56 |
| 15-16 | 14-16 | #191 | -2.445 | 99.222 | 101.667 | -4.722 | +1449 | -4917 | 24.9%9 | -4674 | 50.8%58 | 35.9%65 | 68.2%30 |
| 14-15 | 6-22 | #310 | -12.710 | 97.119 | 109.811 | -3.234 | -10514 | -743 | 25.0%5 | -2667 | 49.1%49 | 33.1%35 | 67.8%34 |
| 13-14 | 15-17 | #256 | -5.731 | 106.153 | 111.915 | -3.732 | -8123 | +3069 | 31.4%47 | -12096 | 50.7%63 | 32.7%26 | 68.8%41 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
52.0%#195
Effective FG %
48.5%#193
3-Point %
33.1%#221
3PAR
33.3%#200
FTAR
38.6%#126
Assist %
50.2%#233
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
38.3%#90
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
30.0%#165
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
16 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9224D-I 0.96
Early 0–10s0.736649.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.172328.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.02622.4% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.087Allowed, D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.85647.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.322925.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.262827.4% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 14-15. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 14-15. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.