On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,289 | 1,047 | -3.6— | 106.9— | 110.5— | 50.8%— | 26.6%— | 15.4%— | 34.8%— | 50.3%— | 70.0%— | 14.5%— | 40.8%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.ShawK. ShawThomasL. Thomas | 141 | 70 | -14.3— | 104.8— | 119.1— | 52.6%— | 23.9%— | 18.4%— | 27.6%— | 52.9%— | 64.9%— | 10.2%— | 18.2%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerShawK. ShawThomasL. ThomasWigginsZ. Wiggins | 138 | 64 | 5.2— | 121.6— | 116.4— | 56.3%— | 33.9%— | 11.6%— | 25.0%— | 50.0%— | 66.7%— | 7.8%— | 30.9%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.TurnerJ. TurnerShawK. Shaw | 112 | 58 | -11.1— | 90.3— | 101.4— | 41.2%— | 21.9%— | 13.4%— | 29.9%— | 42.3%— | 76.7%— | 11.1%— | 45.1%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.HubbardS. HubbardThomasL. Thomas | 79 | 37 | -8.3— | 108.5— | 116.8— | 50.8%— | 27.0%— | 15.1%— | 47.6%— | 61.5%— | 74.2%— | 17.7%— | 26.2%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerTurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawThomasL. Thomas | 64 | 26 | -4.1— | 114.0— | 118.2— | 54.7%— | 26.7%— | 15.6%— | 35.8%— | 55.7%— | 75.9%— | 8.8%— | 22.6%— |
| BattleJ. BattleTurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawThomasL. ThomasWigginsZ. Wiggins | 61 | 24 | -13.5— | 123.1— | 136.6— | 49.1%— | 29.4%— | 8.2%— | 41.8%— | 73.1%— | 82.4%— | 15.6%— | 69.2%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerHubbardS. HubbardShawK. ShawThomasL. Thomas | 52 | 29 | -15.7— | 87.8— | 103.5— | 38.2%— | 24.0%— | 17.2%— | 63.2%— | 42.0%— | 65.6%— | 14.3%— | 38.0%— |
| BattleJ. BattleHubbardS. HubbardTurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawThomasL. Thomas | 45 | 19 | -5.1— | 103.9— | 109.1— | 57.4%— | 15.8%— | 19.9%— | 32.4%— | 59.5%— | 73.7%— | 21.4%— | 27.0%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.TurnerJ. TurnerThomasL. Thomas | 42 | 17 | -18.1— | 106.8— | 124.9— | 52.9%— | 34.8%— | 19.0%— | 42.9%— | 48.6%— | 58.3%— | 13.3%— | 38.9%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.TurnerJ. TurnerWigginsZ. Wiggins | 40 | 18 | 1.9— | 110.4— | 108.6— | 60.6%— | 26.3%— | 22.6%— | 18.2%— | 51.6%— | 57.9%— | 25.8%— | 38.7%— |
| BattleJ. BattleHubbardS. HubbardTurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawWigginsZ. Wiggins | 37 | 17 | -49.2— | 87.0— | 136.2— | 37.5%— | 30.0%— | 19.0%— | 25.0%— | 51.5%— | 42.9%— | 15.4%— | 67.6%— |
| BattleJ. BattleDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.TurnerJ. TurnerThomasL. ThomasWigginsZ. Wiggins | 35 | 14 | 32.3— | 144.8— | 112.5— | 74.1%— | 7.1%— | 5.7%— | 37.9%— | 54.2%— | 66.7%— | 20.5%— | 29.2%— |
| BattleJ. BattleDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.TurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawMcKennaD. McKenna | 35 | 17 | -23.9— | 92.6— | 116.5— | 31.7%— | 29.2%— | 8.7%— | 60.0%— | 54.7%— | 82.4%— | 10.6%— | 31.3%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerHubbardS. HubbardShawK. ShawWigginsZ. Wiggins | 34 | 17 | 23.1— | 110.7— | 87.6— | 58.3%— | 52.9%— | 29.1%— | 23.3%— | 40.6%— | 68.0%— | 18.6%— | 43.8%— |
| BattleJ. BattleDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.TurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawThomasL. Thomas | 32 | 13 | 2.1— | 126.2— | 124.1— | 55.2%— | 33.3%— | 9.5%— | 41.4%— | 51.6%— | 55.6%— | 9.3%— | 34.4%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.ShawK. ShawWigginsZ. Wiggins | 31 | 14 | 39.1— | 113.8— | 74.7— | 51.9%— | 28.6%— | 13.0%— | 38.5%— | 25.9%— | 69.6%— | 15.6%— | 55.6%— |
| BattleJ. BattleSwanton-RodgerC. Swanton-RodgerTurnerJ. TurnerShawK. ShawWigginsZ. Wiggins | 31 | 17 | -2.6— | 107.5— | 110.1— | 34.3%— | 44.4%— | 6.5%— | 34.3%— | 46.6%— | 66.7%— | 15.7%— | 27.6%— |
| BattleJ. BattleDavis Jr.R. Davis Jr.RaymondD. RaymondShawK. ShawThomasL. Thomas | 30 | 12 | -69.7— | 59.5— | 129.1— | 35.0%— | 6.3%— | 23.1%— | 45.0%— | 60.9%— | 63.6%— | 15.2%— | 30.4%— |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.
