Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Portland St. logoPortland St. logoPortland St. logoPortland St. logo

Portland St.14-15

Big SkyCoach: Jase Coburn

14-15NET#253

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Bobby Harvey+11.286+7.384−3.970+3.786−1.044−2.078−7.614−1.766+2.776−1.232+3.232
Jorell Saterfield+7.878+0.150−7.684−0.446−0.646−0.758+2.666−3.582+3.280−0.544−6.682
KJ Allen+6.374+6.782+0.546+1.264+0.758−2.076−2.738+2.724+4.186+0.966−5.778
Ismail Habib+11.186+3.770−7.484−0.446+0.656−1.774+5.380−6.294+1.364−2.020−3.670
Isaiah Johnson+13.490+5.778−7.784+0.860+3.782−0.760+4.678−4.286−3.422+2.282+3.730
Kendall Munson−2.042−5.126−3.166−0.842−0.646+2.218+2.062+1.334+1.970+1.776−4.272
Isiah Kirby−15.410−2.238+13.24−0.150−1.636+0.638−3.432+7.32−2.826+0.864+3.928
Hunter Woods−13.612−8.214+5.422−2.426−1.340+2.912+5.280+0.150−3.322−0.840+7.714
Cole Farrell−4.036−1.244+2.834+1.870+2.270+2.614−1.842+2.822+0.960+2.080+4.326
Hayden Curtiss−6.928−5.922+1.044−1.338−3.722−0.860−10.38−3.380−3.222−3.68−7.584
Keshaun Saunders−14.510−4.328+10.28−3.120+2.372−0.454+3.672+5.76−4.018+0.052+10.86

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Bobby Harvey-0.646106.644107.24847.4%3233.8%6416.3%5032.0%5651.9%4268.9%5018.7%6236.2%28
Jorell Saterfield-1.744104.238106.05046.0%2833.9%6416.7%4835.3%6451.3%4669.1%5019.0%6432.9%38
KJ Allen-2.042106.744108.84446.6%3034.4%6416.2%5233.5%6053.5%3469.5%5219.5%6832.9%38
Ismail Habib0.246105.742105.55246.0%2834.4%6416.3%5236.6%6850.0%5468.5%4818.3%6033.6%34
Isaiah Johnson1.850106.844105.15446.5%3035.9%7016.7%4836.6%6850.6%4866.5%3820.1%7236.8%28
Kendall Munson-5.438101.732107.04845.8%2633.8%6418.1%3835.5%6453.2%3669.0%5020.0%7032.9%38
Isiah Kirby-12.128103.136115.23046.1%2833.3%5817.3%4432.7%5856.2%2466.4%3819.6%6837.1%26
Hunter Woods-14.22498.326112.53444.4%2233.2%5819.1%3238.3%7052.5%3865.6%3618.6%6240.6%20
Cole Farrell-7.434103.336110.74047.5%3435.8%7019.0%3233.1%5854.6%3068.6%4820.7%7438.3%24
Hayden Curtiss-9.73099.628109.34245.2%2431.3%5216.4%5026.5%4050.0%5465.6%3616.4%4629.4%48
Keshaun Saunders-17.122100.430117.52443.4%1836.1%7216.7%4837.6%7057.5%2064.5%3219.2%6444.6%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Bobby Harvey-11.82899.328111.13843.7%2034.8%6618.3%3839.6%7253.6%3466.2%3820.0%7033.0%38
Jorell Saterfield-9.530104.138113.63246.4%3034.5%6617.4%4232.7%5854.8%2865.9%3619.4%6639.5%22
KJ Allen-8.334100.030108.34645.4%2433.7%6418.2%3836.1%6650.8%4865.4%3618.5%6238.6%24
Ismail Habib-10.930102.134112.93446.4%3033.8%6418.0%4031.3%5456.2%2467.2%4220.3%7237.3%26
Isaiah Johnson-11.728101.132112.83445.7%2632.1%5617.4%4431.9%5654.7%3069.8%5417.9%5633.1%36
Kendall Munson-3.440106.744110.14046.5%3034.5%6415.9%5433.5%6051.8%4267.1%4218.3%6037.2%26
Isiah Kirby3.352105.342102.06246.2%2834.9%6816.7%4836.1%6648.9%5669.3%5218.7%6233.2%36
Hunter Woods-0.646106.544107.14846.8%3034.5%6416.2%5233.1%5852.5%4068.9%5019.3%6632.9%38
Cole Farrell-3.440104.540107.94645.7%2633.6%6216.3%5034.9%6451.8%4267.8%4418.6%6234.0%34
Hayden Curtiss-2.842105.542108.44646.5%3035.0%6817.2%4436.8%6853.3%3668.8%5019.9%7036.9%28
Keshaun Saunders-2.542104.740107.34846.6%3033.8%6417.0%4634.0%6051.8%4268.5%4819.1%6433.7%34
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.