Portland St.16-13

Big SkyCoach: Jase Coburn

16-13NET#205

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Qiant Myers	1,632	273	85.7%	+21.9100	+11.796	−10.292	+9.9100	+1.766	−1.064	−9.98	−4.790	−1.734	+3.192	+4.426
Jaylin Henderson	1,572	333	82.5%	+5.170	+11.094	+5.920	+2.274	+6.796	−1.876	+1.864	+3.218	−2.230	−0.642	+0.746
Isaiah Johnson	1,525	380	80.1%	+3.664	−1.840	−5.478	+2.576	−4.416	+1.330	+4.878	−0.656	+1.162	+0.458	−8.088
Terri Miller Jr.	1,068	837	56.1%	+5.572	−0.448	−5.980	+1.466	−3.820	−1.876	−11.66	−1.868	+0.152	+2.384	+1.640
Tre-Vaughn Minott	1,032	873	54.1%	+9.884	+5.378	−4.574	+0.960	+6.996	+1.034	−13.94	−4.690	−1.834	−2.020	−13.996
Cole Farrell	860	1,045	45.1%	−4.734	−2.338	+2.536	−2.030	−4.216	−1.368	+3.672	+3.118	+2.374	−0.346	−1.960
Shane Nowell	676	1,229	35.5%	−13.512	−8.314	+5.222	−4.214	−0.250	+0.738	−2.238	−0.758	−1.040	−2.614	+6.916
Hayden Curtiss	455	1,450	23.9%	−1.146	−1.542	−0.452	−1.734	+2.272	+1.428	+15.098	−2.172	+3.684	−2.316	+4.922
Kelcy Phipps	354	1,551	18.6%	−7.524	−10.68	−3.266	−6.08	−4.514	+1.724	+13.998	+1.038	+1.264	+3.594	+0.546
Ismail Habib	228	1,677	12.0%	−14.610	+2.062	+16.60	−0.446	+0.556	−0.658	+3.170	+8.80	−7.94	+1.980	+9.78
Isaac Brice	124	1,781	6.5%	−11.216	+2.968	+14.12	+2.880	+1.768	+1.330	+18.7100	+9.70	+5.794	−1.624	+8.810

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Qiant Myers	1,632	273	85.7%	5.456	108.448	103.060	51.8%52	36.7%72	18.8%34	32.6%58	49.1%56	67.6%44	20.1%70	35.6%32
Jaylin Henderson	1,572	333	82.5%	3.152	108.648	105.554	50.8%46	37.6%76	18.6%36	34.3%62	50.4%50	67.4%42	19.6%68	35.0%34
Isaiah Johnson	1,525	380	80.1%	2.952	106.442	103.458	50.9%46	35.5%68	19.2%30	35.0%64	49.7%56	68.1%46	19.7%68	33.3%38
Terri Miller Jr.	1,068	837	56.1%	4.856	106.544	101.864	51.0%48	34.8%66	18.2%38	29.0%46	49.0%58	67.9%44	20.7%74	35.6%32
Tre-Vaughn Minott	1,032	873	54.1%	6.758	109.250	102.562	50.8%46	39.6%80	19.4%30	27.9%44	47.9%62	67.1%42	18.8%62	29.0%50
Cole Farrell	860	1,045	45.1%	-0.346	105.540	105.852	49.3%38	34.2%64	18.3%38	36.0%66	51.5%46	69.1%50	19.5%66	33.8%38
Shane Nowell	676	1,229	35.5%	-6.536	101.432	107.948	47.7%32	36.4%72	19.4%30	32.5%58	49.4%56	67.2%42	18.0%56	39.3%24
Hayden Curtiss	455	1,450	23.9%	1.450	105.640	104.256	49.1%38	38.1%76	20.0%26	45.5%82	48.2%62	70.5%56	17.9%56	38.6%26
Kelcy Phipps	354	1,551	18.6%	-3.940	98.124	101.962	45.5%24	32.8%58	20.3%24	45.5%82	50.7%50	68.8%50	22.5%82	35.3%34
Ismail Habib	228	1,677	12.0%	-10.530	108.548	119.022	50.0%40	36.9%74	18.4%36	36.7%68	57.6%20	60.7%20	21.3%76	43.5%18
Isaac Brice	124	1,781	6.5%	-8.232	109.550	117.724	53.0%58	38.1%76	20.1%24	51.5%88	58.9%16	73.2%70	18.1%58	43.2%18

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Qiant Myers	1,632	273	85.7%	-16.522	96.722	113.234	41.8%14	35.1%66	19.8%28	42.5%78	53.8%34	69.2%52	17.0%48	31.2%44
Jaylin Henderson	1,572	333	82.5%	-2.044	97.724	99.768	48.6%36	30.9%50	20.4%24	32.5%58	47.2%66	69.6%54	20.1%70	34.3%36
Isaiah Johnson	1,525	380	80.1%	-0.646	108.248	108.846	48.4%36	39.9%80	17.9%40	30.2%50	50.3%50	67.0%42	19.3%66	41.3%22
Terri Miller Jr.	1,068	837	56.1%	-0.846	107.044	107.748	49.6%40	38.5%78	20.0%26	40.6%76	50.8%50	67.8%44	18.4%60	34.0%36
Tre-Vaughn Minott	1,032	873	54.1%	-3.142	103.836	106.950	49.9%40	32.6%58	18.4%36	41.8%78	52.5%40	68.9%50	20.7%74	42.9%18
Cole Farrell	860	1,045	45.1%	4.454	107.746	103.458	51.3%50	38.4%76	19.5%28	32.4%56	48.4%60	66.8%42	19.8%68	35.8%32
Shane Nowell	676	1,229	35.5%	7.060	109.750	102.760	51.9%52	36.5%72	18.7%34	34.8%64	50.1%50	68.2%46	20.5%72	32.4%40
Hayden Curtiss	455	1,450	23.9%	2.552	107.144	104.656	50.8%46	35.9%70	18.6%36	30.5%52	50.4%50	66.9%42	20.2%72	33.7%38
Kelcy Phipps	354	1,551	18.6%	3.654	108.748	105.154	51.4%50	37.3%74	18.6%36	31.6%54	49.7%56	67.6%44	19.0%64	34.8%34
Ismail Habib	228	1,677	12.0%	4.154	106.542	102.462	50.4%46	36.4%72	19.0%32	33.6%60	48.8%58	68.7%48	19.4%66	33.7%38
Isaac Brice	124	1,781	6.5%	2.952	106.542	103.658	50.2%46	36.4%72	18.9%34	32.9%58	49.3%56	67.5%44	19.8%68	34.4%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.