Richmond8-22

A10Coach: Chris Mooney

8-22NET#257

Poss1,913

Net Rtg-13.026

ORtg101.332

DRtg114.332

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	1,913	978	-13.026	101.332	114.332	48.1%34	22.1%18	15.7%56	29.9%50	52.9%38	68.5%48	16.1%42	37.1%28
NeskovicD. NeskovicWalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneRocheJ. RocheArtis WhiteB. Artis White	175	100	-13.126	100.930	114.132	47.2%30	19.6%12	10.8%86	16.0%12	57.6%20	70.8%58	17.1%50	21.2%74
TyneM. TyneHuntD. HuntBeagleJ. BeagleRoumoglouA. RoumoglouRocheJ. Roche	87	47	-5.338	98.626	103.958	52.1%54	15.9%8	17.2%44	17.8%16	50.0%54	77.4%84	12.7%20	20.0%78
NeskovicD. NeskovicWalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneHuntD. HuntRoumoglouA. Roumoglou	68	30	-41.16	95.020	136.24	48.9%38	32.1%56	32.2%0	54.5%90	58.7%16	65.9%38	7.5%4	42.9%20
NeskovicD. NeskovicWalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneTannerC. TannerArtis WhiteB. Artis White	65	34	-32.38	87.610	119.920	40.4%12	9.4%2	12.3%80	32.7%58	52.0%44	63.6%28	15.4%38	48.0%14
NeskovicD. NeskovicWalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneHuntD. HuntRocheJ. Roche	62	28	-9.332	111.456	120.720	47.1%30	24.2%24	12.9%76	45.1%82	59.8%14	74.2%74	15.5%38	25.0%64
NeskovicD. NeskovicWalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneRoumoglouA. RoumoglouRocheJ. Roche	61	35	-7.534	96.322	103.858	49.0%38	12.9%4	16.3%52	17.6%16	48.2%62	75.0%76	14.4%30	28.6%52
NeskovicD. NeskovicWalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneTannerC. TannerHuntD. Hunt	57	27	-1.844	106.042	107.848	48.9%38	26.7%32	17.7%42	34.0%62	62.2%8	64.7%32	32.3%100	37.8%28
WalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneHuntD. HuntRoumoglouA. RoumoglouRocheJ. Roche	52	25	-28.910	107.446	136.34	41.3%12	27.0%34	5.8%98	28.8%46	68.6%2	73.9%74	14.9%34	41.9%20
WalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneTannerC. TannerRocheJ. RocheArtis WhiteB. Artis White	51	27	-23.314	98.426	121.718	48.9%38	11.1%4	9.8%90	17.8%16	59.5%14	70.8%60	16.0%42	35.7%32
NeskovicD. NeskovicTyneM. TyneHuntD. HuntBeagleJ. BeagleRocheJ. Roche	48	24	-65.32	76.94	142.22	28.9%2	32.4%56	16.6%50	33.3%60	61.5%10	45.5%2	20.0%70	48.7%12
TyneM. TyneTannerC. TannerHuntD. HuntBeagleJ. BeagleRoumoglouA. Roumoglou	47	25	-17.022	100.730	117.724	47.4%30	23.1%20	17.1%46	36.8%68	54.3%32	46.2%2	28.3%96	71.4%2
NeskovicD. NeskovicTyneM. TyneHuntD. HuntBeagleJ. BeagleRoumoglouA. Roumoglou	36	19	-15.124	127.186	142.22	55.9%70	33.3%62	8.3%94	38.2%70	68.3%2	72.2%66	11.9%16	33.3%38
NeskovicD. NeskovicHuntD. HuntBeagleJ. BeagleRoumoglouA. RoumoglouArtis WhiteB. Artis White	34	18	24.584	118.072	93.580	69.2%98	0.0%0	17.7%42	15.4%10	42.9%82	77.3%84	17.5%54	39.3%24
WalzM. WalzTyneM. TyneRoumoglouA. RoumoglouRocheJ. RocheArtis WhiteB. Artis White	32	16	-31.98	88.110	120.020	37.9%8	18.2%12	9.4%92	27.6%42	51.6%46	63.2%26	15.0%34	21.9%72
NeskovicD. NeskovicBeagleJ. BeagleRoumoglouA. RoumoglouRocheJ. RocheArtis WhiteB. Artis White	32	16	-22.316	91.514	113.732	50.0%40	0.0%0	22.1%16	63.2%96	54.3%32	64.3%30	22.1%80	60.9%4

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.