Richmond14-17

A10Coach: Chris Mooney

14-17NET#137

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Will Johnston	1,459	656	69.0%	−13.312	+1.660	+14.92	+2.072	−3.818	−1.472	−3.034	+5.76	−2.724	−3.38	−3.068
AJ Lopez	1,391	723	65.8%	−18.16	+3.268	+21.20	+4.490	−7.16	−0.454	+4.576	+4.88	−8.24	−4.92	+10.66
Aiden Argabright	1,238	876	58.6%	+9.082	−1.442	−10.492	−6.76	+0.254	−2.182	+21.9100	−4.286	−1.138	+3.896	+5.320
Mike Walz	1,104	1,010	52.2%	−5.032	+3.370	+8.210	+1.768	+1.566	+0.148	−13.34	+2.128	+1.768	−4.92	−7.084
Mikkel Tyne	958	1,156	45.3%	−5.132	+1.056	+6.116	+4.290	+0.152	+1.230	−17.32	+1.038	+0.556	−2.514	+3.828
Collin Tanner	855	1,259	40.5%	−8.122	−1.244	+6.814	+0.354	+1.162	+0.934	−4.926	+5.28	+3.786	−2.416	−1.860
Jaden Daughtry	831	1,283	39.3%	+21.998	+6.384	−15.598	+3.686	+2.978	+0.344	−5.124	−6.094	+2.980	+2.486	−9.892
David Thomas	704	1,411	33.3%	+6.576	−0.946	−7.586	−1.138	+1.668	+0.146	+5.480	−1.768	+2.778	+1.170	−4.372
Apostolos Roumoglou	670	1,444	31.7%	+10.486	−5.522	−15.998	−4.116	+1.970	−0.456	−4.528	−6.294	+0.556	+4.998	−7.886
Jonathan Beagle	606	1,508	28.7%	+17.596	+0.956	−16.698	−0.742	+1.364	+0.344	+15.4100	−5.492	+3.080	+4.298	+0.944
Jaylen Robinson	501	1,613	23.7%	−13.112	−7.416	+5.718	−2.426	−3.422	+0.442	+7.688	+3.614	−3.320	+2.588	+6.816
Will Harper III	220	1,894	10.4%	−7.424	−1.542	+5.918	−3.320	+5.392	+1.328	−0.748	+3.018	−1.138	−0.540	+14.52

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Will Johnston	1,459	656	69.0%	-2.042	111.752	113.734	53.3%54	23.9%26	13.8%64	35.7%56	54.1%36	68.0%40	16.8%56	34.1%44
AJ Lopez	1,391	723	65.8%	-4.138	112.354	116.428	54.3%58	22.5%22	14.2%62	38.2%62	54.0%36	66.0%32	16.1%50	38.6%32
Aiden Argabright	1,238	876	58.6%	6.056	110.650	104.656	49.8%36	25.2%32	13.4%68	46.0%76	50.5%52	68.5%42	19.4%72	37.3%36
Mike Walz	1,104	1,010	52.2%	-0.246	112.756	112.936	53.5%56	25.9%34	14.3%62	30.4%42	53.3%40	69.7%48	15.5%44	31.8%50
Mikkel Tyne	958	1,156	45.3%	-0.644	111.852	112.338	54.9%62	25.2%32	14.9%56	27.4%34	52.9%42	69.2%46	16.5%52	37.0%36
Collin Tanner	855	1,259	40.5%	-2.640	110.550	113.136	52.8%52	25.8%34	14.8%58	33.7%52	55.4%30	71.2%54	16.4%52	33.9%44
Jaden Daughtry	831	1,283	39.3%	15.772	115.062	99.470	54.9%62	26.9%38	14.4%60	33.5%52	48.7%60	70.6%52	19.3%72	29.0%58
David Thomas	704	1,411	33.3%	6.556	110.650	104.158	52.0%48	26.2%34	14.4%62	40.2%66	51.2%50	70.7%52	18.6%68	32.2%48
Apostolos Roumoglou	670	1,444	31.7%	9.162	107.442	98.472	49.9%36	26.4%36	14.0%64	33.6%52	48.2%64	69.3%46	21.1%82	29.7%56
Jonathan Beagle	606	1,508	28.7%	14.770	111.852	97.174	52.2%50	26.1%34	14.5%60	47.7%80	48.4%62	71.0%54	20.9%80	35.6%40
Jaylen Robinson	501	1,613	23.7%	-7.832	105.538	113.336	50.9%42	22.6%22	14.6%60	42.4%70	55.1%32	66.4%32	19.7%74	40.2%28
Will Harper III	220	1,894	10.4%	-4.538	109.948	114.334	49.7%36	29.9%50	15.4%52	36.0%56	55.0%32	67.9%40	17.3%60	48.0%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Will Johnston	1,459	656	69.0%	11.364	110.148	98.870	51.3%44	27.8%40	15.2%54	38.7%64	48.4%62	70.7%52	20.1%76	37.1%36
AJ Lopez	1,391	723	65.8%	13.968	109.146	95.278	49.8%36	29.6%50	14.5%60	33.7%52	49.2%58	74.2%68	21.0%80	28.0%60
Aiden Argabright	1,238	876	58.6%	-3.040	112.054	115.032	56.5%70	25.1%32	15.5%52	24.1%24	54.7%34	69.6%48	15.7%46	32.0%50
Mike Walz	1,104	1,010	52.2%	4.854	109.548	104.756	51.8%48	24.4%28	14.3%62	43.8%74	51.2%50	68.0%40	20.4%78	38.8%32
Mikkel Tyne	958	1,156	45.3%	4.554	110.750	106.252	50.7%42	25.1%32	13.8%66	44.6%74	51.9%46	68.7%44	19.0%70	33.3%46
Collin Tanner	855	1,259	40.5%	5.554	111.752	106.252	52.6%52	24.7%28	13.9%64	38.6%62	50.2%52	67.5%38	18.8%70	35.7%40
Jaden Daughtry	831	1,283	39.3%	-6.234	108.744	114.932	51.2%44	24.0%28	14.2%62	38.7%62	54.6%34	67.8%40	16.9%56	38.8%32
David Thomas	704	1,411	33.3%	-0.046	111.552	111.540	53.0%54	24.6%28	14.2%62	34.8%54	52.9%42	68.0%40	17.4%60	36.4%38
Apostolos Roumoglou	670	1,444	31.7%	-1.342	112.956	114.234	54.0%58	24.5%28	14.4%60	38.1%62	54.4%34	68.7%44	16.2%50	37.5%34
Jonathan Beagle	606	1,508	28.7%	-2.840	110.950	113.734	52.9%52	24.8%28	14.2%62	32.4%48	53.8%38	68.0%40	16.6%54	34.8%42
Jaylen Robinson	501	1,613	23.7%	5.354	112.956	107.650	53.2%54	26.0%34	14.2%62	34.9%54	51.5%48	69.7%48	17.2%58	33.4%44
Will Harper III	220	1,894	10.4%	3.050	111.352	108.448	53.0%54	24.6%28	14.1%62	36.7%58	52.0%44	69.0%46	17.9%62	33.5%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.