Schedule
W
L
WW
WL
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
LWWWLLWLWWL
LWWWLLLWWWWLLLWWWLLWWLWWWLLWLWWLTeam Stats
32 games- Net Rating8.783
- Offensive Rating109.251
- Defensive Rating100.587
- Pace62.418
- Effective FG%47.5%16
- Off Rebound Pct30.5%64
- Turnover Pct18.7%65
- FT Attempt Rate35.3%51
Team Stats
32 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating8.783
- Offensive Rating109.251
- Defensive Rating100.587
- Pace62.418
- Effective FG%47.5%16
- Off Rebound Pct30.5%64
- Turnover Pct18.7%65
- FT Attempt Rate35.3%51
Results & Margin
- Win Pct56.3%64
- Point Margin / Game5.483
- Points / Game68.120
- Points Allowed / Game62.796
- 1st Half Margin5.291
- 2nd Half Margin0.360
- Avg Largest Lead14.487
- Avg Largest Deficit7.187
Box Score
- Points / Game68.120
- Rebounds / Game36.366
- Assists / Game10.78
- ORebs / Game10.860
- DRebs / Game25.564
- Steals / Game6.874
- Blocks / Game4.994
- Turnovers / Game11.784
- PFs / Game17.580
Shooting
- FGMs / Game23.416
- FGAs / Game56.940
- Field Goal Pct41.2%13
- 2PMs / Game16.317
- 2PAs / Game34.324
- 2-Point Pct47.5%27
- 3PMs / Game7.248
- 3PAs / Game22.670
- 3-Point Pct31.6%10
- FTMs / Game14.146
- FTAs / Game20.147
- Free Throw Pct70.1%50
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s47.8%33
- % Pts from 3s31.5%57
- % Pts from FTs20.7%64
- Paint Pts / Game18.439
- % Pts in Paint27.1%45
- Fast Break Pts / Game3.652
- % Pts on Fast Break5.3%57
- Points off TOVs / Game11.247
- % Pts off TOVs16.4%56
- 1st Half Pts / Game33.950
- 2nd Half Pts / Game33.87
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %51.8%19
- Points / Shot1.2022
- 3-Point Att Rate39.8%74
- Assist Pct45.6%10
- Assists / 100 Poss17.114
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.91x27
- PF Drawn / Game19.052
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%44.8%98
- Opp True Shooting %49.2%97
- Opp Field Goal Pct39.0%98
- Opp 2-Point Pct42.9%98
- Opp 3-Point Pct32.1%90
- Opp 3PA Rate36.3%50
- Opp FT Att Rate32.5%69
- Opp Points / Shot1.1396
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game62.796
- Paint Pts Allowed14.278
- Fast Break Pts Allowed3.455
- Pts off TOVs Allowed8.677
- Opp Assist Pct50.9%62
- TOVs Forced / Game12.743
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct70.9%52
- Turnovers Forced Pct20.4%66
- Steal Pct11.0%84
- Block Pct7.8%95
- Hakeem Pct18.8%92
- PF Efficiency0.92x80
- Steals / PF0.39x87
- Blocks / PF0.28x95
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 350 D-I teams- #8Opp eFG%44.8%
- #34Adj DRtg95.5
- #36Opp 3P%32.1%
- #57Paint Pts %43.4%
- #65Pts Diff+173
- #94TOV%17.6%
- #101FB Pts %8.5%
- #1193PM Diff+21
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
- #8Opp eFG%44.8%
- #34Adj DRtg95.5
- #36Opp 3P%32.1%
- #57Paint Pts %43.4%
- #65Pts Diff+173
- #94TOV%17.6%
- #101FB Pts %8.5%
- #1193PM Diff+21
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
- #313AST%45.6%
- #3133P%31.6%
- #292eFG%47.5%
- #285TS%51.2%
- #174Adj ORtg103.4
- #171FTAR35.3%
- #169Opp OREB%29.1%
- #142Opp TOV%19.2%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2016-17- 1
UNC GreensboroUNCG 2022-2318-12SouthernMost alike in Adj D, OREB%, Opp TOV%86 - 2
Duquesne 2023-2424-12A10Most alike in OREB%, FT rate, Adj D86 - 3
West VirginiaWVU 2025-2621-14Big 12Most alike in FT rate, 3PA rate, Opp TOV%85 - 4
Drexel 2022-2316-15CAAMost alike in 3PA rate, OREB%, Opp TOV%84 - 5
North Carolina CentralNC Central 2016-1722-9MEACMost alike in Opp eFG%, Adj O, TOV%83 - 6
Illinois St. 2016-1727-7MVCMost alike in Opp TOV%, OREB%, Tempo82 - 7
Davidson 2023-2413-17A10Most alike in Adj O, TOV%, 3PA rate82 - 8
Clemson 2014-1516-15ACCMost alike in eFG%, Adj O, Tempo81 - 9UNC GreensboroUNCG 2024-2517-12SouthernMost alike in OREB%, 3PA rate, Opp OREB%81
- 10
Penn St. 2015-1616-16Big 10Most alike in Opp OREB%, TOV%, eFG%81
Schedule
Loading the schedule
ZCZylanCheathamSoMPMalikPopeJr
JeremyHemsleySo
VIValentineIzunduSr
MHMaxHoetzelSoDADakaraiAllenSrTKTreyKellJrMSMattShrigleySr
JeremyHemsleySoDWD'ErrylWilliamsSr
NNNolanNarainFr
MGMontaqueGill-CaesarSoEWEmmanuelWilsonFr| Z. CheathamZylan Cheatham | So | 6'9" | +0.775 | – | – | 61.3%83 | 22.3%78 | 9.1 | 6.3 | 1.4 | 18.2% | 75.2% |
| M. PopeMalik Pope | Jr | 6'10" | +0.672 | – | – | 54.0%50 | 23.1%82 | 11.0 | 6.1 | 1.5 | 39.2% | 70.3% |
| V. IzunduValentine Izundu | Sr | 6'10" | +0.569 | – | – | 58.3%71 | 9.6%7 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 40.0% |
| M. HoetzelMax Hoetzel | So | 6'9" | +0.566 | – | – | 54.0%50 | 20.2%65 | 7.7 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 34.7% | 81.0% |
| D. AllenDakarai Allen | Sr | 6'5" | +0.464 | – | – | 60.5%80 | 16.1%36 | 8.3 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 29.5% | 65.5% |
| T. KellTrey Kell | Jr | 6'4" | +0.463 | – | – | 48.8%27 | 24.3%86 | 13.2 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 26.2% | 77.0% |
| M. ShrigleyMatt Shrigley | Sr | 6'6" | +0.256 | – | – | 48.0%24 | 14.0%22 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 32.6% | 63.2% |
| J. HemsleyJeremy Hemsley | So | 6'3" | -0.625 | – | – | 52.1%41 | 25.1%89 | 12.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 36.3% | 63.9% |
| D. WilliamsD'Erryl Williams | Sr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 44.4%17 | 12.7%16 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 33.3% | 54.5% |
| N. NarainNolan Narain | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 48.1%25 | 18.0%49 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| M. Gill-CaesarMontaque Gill-Caesar | So | 6'6" | – | – | – | 37.0%9 | 21.5%73 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 13.9% | 77.4% |
| E. WilsonEmmanuel Wilson | Fr | 6'2" | – | – | – | 19.9%3 | 25.5%90 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 22-11 | #52 | 14.286 | 112.970 | 98.795 | 7.079 | +4859 | -797 | 30.7%46 | -7384 | 53.2%70 | 34.7%60 | 73.1%55 |
| 24-2511 | 21-10 | #61 | 13.183 | 111.372 | 98.292 | 7.381 | -938 | -1039 | 29.5%42 | -7186 | 50.9%44 | 33.3%39 | 66.4%7 |
| 23-245 | 26-11 | #19 | 16.191 | 112.279 | 96.096 | 7.380 | +15386 | -1040 | 33.2%82 | -4772 | 50.0%34 | 31.5%15 | 73.3%69 |
| 22-235 | 32-7 | #16 | 18.096 | 110.779 | 92.798 | 8.793 | +16188 | +2865 | 31.9%77 | -5374 | 49.8%35 | 34.8%59 | 72.2%56 |
| 21-228 | 23-9 | #28 | 14.992 | 104.652 | 89.799 | 5.778 | +6565 | -145 | 29.5%60 | -5478 | 48.7%26 | 35.4%76 | 69.2%25 |
| 19-20 | 30-2 | #6 | 22.199 | 112.696 | 90.599 | 2.570 | +10677 | +7892 | 28.9%55 | -10894 | 54.8%95 | 38.0%96 | 77.1%95 |
| 18-19 | 21-13 | #105 | 5.972 | 105.453 | 99.678 | 2.373 | +5764 | -246 | 29.4%58 | -2159 | 50.3%39 | 36.2%75 | 71.6%58 |
| 17-1811 | 22-11 | #36 | 14.390 | 112.080 | 97.793 | 3.575 | +17389 | -1243 | 31.9%77 | -4979 | 51.9%58 | 33.7%29 | 71.5%53 |
| 16-17 | 19-14 | #79 | 7.377 | 103.143 | 95.891 | 0.765 | +4260 | +1459 | 30.0%56 | -3769 | 47.8%15 | 31.7%9 | 69.8%47 |
| 15-16 | 26-10 | #48 | 12.987 | 104.451 | 91.699 | 3.573 | +19789 | -347 | 34.1%85 | -250 | 47.3%17 | 32.6%22 | 69.1%41 |
| 14-158 | 26-9 | #32 | 13.990 | 102.750 | 88.899 | 4.276 | +11880 | +855 | 35.4%86 | -6081 | 46.7%19 | 32.0%21 | 63.0%4 |
| 13-144 | 29-5 | #24 | 19.394 | 110.476 | 91.198 | 4.273 | +18493 | +1257 | 36.7%92 | -13597 | 48.1%29 | 35.8%68 | 66.3%17 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
51.2%#285
Effective FG %
47.5%#292
3-Point %
31.6%#313
3PAR
39.8%#92
FTAR
35.3%#171
Assist %
45.6%#313
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
27.5%#322
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
34.7%#290
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
13 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9521D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.798249.2% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.09325.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.111325.0% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9096Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.579844.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.218926.7% of shots
Late 21s+1.118828.8% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.