Schedule
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
WW
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
WW
LW
W
WW
WLWLLWWL
WLWLWWLLWWLWLWLWLWWWLWWWWWLWLLWWLTeam Stats
33 games- Net Rating4.471
- Offensive Rating111.455
- Defensive Rating107.067
- Pace63.641
- Effective FG%49.9%41
- Off Rebound Pct28.9%56
- Turnover Pct19.7%52
- FT Attempt Rate35.2%70
Team Stats
33 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating4.471
- Offensive Rating111.455
- Defensive Rating107.067
- Pace63.641
- Effective FG%49.9%41
- Off Rebound Pct28.9%56
- Turnover Pct19.7%52
- FT Attempt Rate35.2%70
Results & Margin
- Win Pct60.6%74
- Point Margin / Game2.871
- Points / Game70.842
- Points Allowed / Game68.080
- 1st Half Margin1.972
- 2nd Half Margin0.963
- Avg Largest Lead14.689
- Avg Largest Deficit9.761
Box Score
- Points / Game70.842
- Rebounds / Game35.661
- Assists / Game13.971
- ORebs / Game9.950
- DRebs / Game25.768
- Steals / Game5.941
- Blocks / Game3.458
- Turnovers / Game12.561
- PFs / Game18.829
Shooting
- FGMs / Game24.532
- FGAs / Game56.637
- Field Goal Pct43.3%39
- 2PMs / Game17.038
- 2PAs / Game35.554
- 2-Point Pct47.9%28
- 3PMs / Game7.545
- 3PAs / Game21.033
- 3-Point Pct35.6%70
- FTMs / Game14.366
- FTAs / Game19.964
- Free Throw Pct72.0%63
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s48.1%40
- % Pts from 3s31.7%47
- % Pts from FTs20.2%72
- Paint Pts / Game18.131
- % Pts in Paint25.6%32
- Fast Break Pts / Game4.951
- % Pts on Fast Break6.9%51
- Points off TOVs / Game10.135
- % Pts off TOVs14.2%34
- 1st Half Pts / Game34.158
- 2nd Half Pts / Game36.737
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %54.2%49
- Points / Shot1.2552
- 3-Point Att Rate37.2%39
- Assist Pct56.7%85
- Assists / 100 Poss21.971
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.11x69
- PF Drawn / Game19.077
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%48.2%84
- Opp True Shooting %52.1%82
- Opp Field Goal Pct41.2%89
- Opp 2-Point Pct47.2%84
- Opp 3-Point Pct33.0%74
- Opp 3PA Rate41.9%20
- Opp FT Att Rate33.3%44
- Opp Points / Shot1.1979
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game68.080
- Paint Pts Allowed17.573
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.463
- Pts off TOVs Allowed9.075
- Opp Assist Pct54.1%33
- TOVs Forced / Game12.954
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct71.6%48
- Turnovers Forced Pct20.3%55
- Steal Pct9.2%42
- Block Pct5.3%55
- Hakeem Pct14.5%48
- PF Efficiency0.99x53
- Steals / PF0.31x31
- Blocks / PF0.18x53
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 353 D-I teams- #54AST%56.7%
- #57Opp eFG%48.2%
- #75Adj DRtg99.1
- #93Opp 3P%33.0%
- #95SOS2.9
- #104FTAR35.2%
- #104Pts Diff+93
- #1073P%35.6%
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
- #54AST%56.7%
- #57Opp eFG%48.2%
- #75Adj DRtg99.1
- #93Opp 3P%33.0%
- #95SOS2.9
- #104FTAR35.2%
- #104Pts Diff+93
- #1073P%35.6%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
- #236Paint Pts %36.7%
- #2123PM Diff-13
- #210eFG%49.9%
- #184TS%53.6%
- #183Opp OREB%28.4%
- #169Adj ORtg104.8
- #154OREB%28.9%
- #150TOV%18.4%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1
Valparaiso 2016-1723-8HorizonMost alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, TOV%93 - 2
MississippiOle Miss 2019-2015-17SECMost alike in Opp OREB%, Adj O, Adj D91 - 3
Wichita St. 2022-2317-15AmericanMost alike in OREB%, Tempo, Adj O91 - 4
Tulsa 2014-1523-10AmericanMost alike in 3PA rate, Tempo, Opp TOV%91 - 5
Ohio St. 2015-1621-14Big 10Most alike in OREB%, eFG%, Adj O90 - 6
La Salle 2013-1415-16A10Most alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, TOV%90 - 7
Louisiana TechLa. Tech 2018-1918-13C-USAMost alike in eFG%, Adj O, OREB%90 - 8UNLV 2024-2518-15MWCMost alike in Adj O, Adj D, Opp OREB%89
- 9San Diego 2014-1514-16WCCMost alike in eFG%, Adj O, Adj D89
- 10
Providence 2017-1819-13Big EastMost alike in OREB%, Opp OREB%, Opp TOV%89
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JSJordanSchakelSoNMNathanMensahFr
DevinWatsonSr
JalenMcDanielsSo
JeremyHemsleySrMMMattMitchellSo
DevinWatsonSrJalenMcDanielsSoJeremyHemsleySrMMMattMitchellSoNNNolanNarainJr
MSMichaelSohikishSr
ASAdamSeikoFrJMJoelMensahFr
ECEdChangFr
AAAguekAropFr
| J. SchakelJordan Schakel | So | 6'6" | +1.693 | – | – | 65.1%89 | 13.1%17 | 7.4 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 42.2% | 84.1% |
| N. MensahNathan Mensah | Fr | 6'10" | +0.982 | – | – | 59.4%74 | 15.6%32 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 0.6 | 0.0% | 71.0% |
| D. WatsonDevin Watson | Sr | 6'1" | +0.567 | – | – | 54.7%53 | 25.6%90 | 16.0 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 37.4% | 74.7% |
| J. McDanielsJalen McDaniels | So | 6'10" | +0.567 | – | – | 52.8%43 | 27.9%95 | 15.9 | 8.3 | 2.1 | 30.6% | 73.6% |
| J. HemsleyJeremy Hemsley | Sr | 6'3" | -0.144 | – | – | 52.1%40 | 18.4%52 | 9.2 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 35.8% | 65.8% |
| M. MitchellMatt Mitchell | So | 6'6" | -0.237 | – | – | 53.8%48 | 21.8%76 | 10.3 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 32.0% | 76.0% |
| N. NarainNolan Narain | Jr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 54.0%49 | 14.7%27 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 28.6% | 40.0% |
| M. SohikishMichael Sohikish | Sr | 5'9" | – | – | – | 46.4%19 | 17.3%44 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 20.0% | 50.0% |
| A. SeikoAdam Seiko | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 71.8%94 | 9.5%6 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 37.9% | 70.8% |
| J. MensahJoel Mensah | Fr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 27.8%5 | 18.2%51 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 75.0% |
| E. ChangEd Chang | Fr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 65.7%89 | 22.0%77 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 38.5% | 75.0% |
| A. AropAguek Arop | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 51.2%35 | 14.6%26 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 20.0% | 61.3% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 22-11 | #52 | 14.286 | 112.970 | 98.795 | 7.079 | +4859 | -797 | 30.7%46 | -7384 | 53.2%70 | 34.7%60 | 73.1%55 |
| 24-2511 | 21-10 | #61 | 13.183 | 111.372 | 98.292 | 7.381 | -938 | -1039 | 29.5%42 | -7186 | 50.9%44 | 33.3%39 | 66.4%7 |
| 23-245 | 26-11 | #19 | 16.191 | 112.279 | 96.096 | 7.380 | +15386 | -1040 | 33.2%82 | -4772 | 50.0%34 | 31.5%15 | 73.3%69 |
| 22-235 | 32-7 | #16 | 18.096 | 110.779 | 92.798 | 8.793 | +16188 | +2865 | 31.9%77 | -5374 | 49.8%35 | 34.8%59 | 72.2%56 |
| 21-228 | 23-9 | #28 | 14.992 | 104.652 | 89.799 | 5.778 | +6565 | -145 | 29.5%60 | -5478 | 48.7%26 | 35.4%76 | 69.2%25 |
| 19-20 | 30-2 | #6 | 22.199 | 112.696 | 90.599 | 2.570 | +10677 | +7892 | 28.9%55 | -10894 | 54.8%95 | 38.0%96 | 77.1%95 |
| 18-19 | 21-13 | #105 | 5.972 | 105.453 | 99.678 | 2.373 | +5764 | -246 | 29.4%58 | -2159 | 50.3%39 | 36.2%75 | 71.6%58 |
| 17-1811 | 22-11 | #36 | 14.390 | 112.080 | 97.793 | 3.575 | +17389 | -1243 | 31.9%77 | -4979 | 51.9%58 | 33.7%29 | 71.5%53 |
| 16-17 | 19-14 | #79 | 7.377 | 103.143 | 95.891 | 0.765 | +4260 | +1459 | 30.0%56 | -3769 | 47.8%15 | 31.7%9 | 69.8%47 |
| 15-16 | 26-10 | #48 | 12.987 | 104.451 | 91.699 | 3.573 | +19789 | -347 | 34.1%85 | -250 | 47.3%17 | 32.6%22 | 69.1%41 |
| 14-158 | 26-9 | #32 | 13.990 | 102.750 | 88.899 | 4.276 | +11880 | +855 | 35.4%86 | -6081 | 46.7%19 | 32.0%21 | 63.0%4 |
| 13-144 | 29-5 | #24 | 19.394 | 110.476 | 91.198 | 4.273 | +18493 | +1257 | 36.7%92 | -13597 | 48.1%29 | 35.8%68 | 66.3%17 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
53.6%#184
Effective FG %
49.9%#208
3-Point %
35.6%#106
3PAR
37.2%#212
FTAR
35.2%#104
Assist %
56.7%#53
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
24.2%#350
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
35.5%#336
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
12 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9620D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.712053.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.214225.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.318820.2% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9491Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.727849.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.225628.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.077922.5% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.