Schedule
WW
L
W
WL
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
LL
L
W
W
WWL
L
WLLLL
LWWLWWLLWWWLWLWWLLLWWWWLLWLLLLTeam Stats
31 games- Net Rating8.580
- Offensive Rating123.589
- Defensive Rating115.030
- Pace62.321
- Effective FG%52.7%86
- Off Rebound Pct27.9%32
- Turnover Pct18.7%59
- FT Attempt Rate34.3%32
Team Stats
31 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating8.580
- Offensive Rating123.589
- Defensive Rating115.030
- Pace62.321
- Effective FG%52.7%86
- Off Rebound Pct27.9%32
- Turnover Pct18.7%59
- FT Attempt Rate34.3%32
Results & Margin
- Win Pct51.6%53
- Point Margin / Game5.380
- Points / Game77.082
- Points Allowed / Game71.656
- 1st Half Margin2.473
- 2nd Half Margin2.983
- Avg Largest Lead14.183
- Avg Largest Deficit6.987
Box Score
- Points / Game77.082
- Rebounds / Game36.057
- Assists / Game16.193
- ORebs / Game9.526
- DRebs / Game26.478
- Steals / Game5.326
- Blocks / Game2.07
- Turnovers / Game11.775
- PFs / Game17.388
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.981
- FGAs / Game58.764
- Field Goal Pct45.8%81
- 2PMs / Game18.865
- 2PAs / Game36.442
- 2-Point Pct51.7%83
- 3PMs / Game8.178
- 3PAs / Game22.376
- 3-Point Pct36.3%73
- FTMs / Game15.158
- FTAs / Game20.138
- Free Throw Pct74.8%92
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s48.9%36
- % Pts from 3s31.6%68
- % Pts from FTs19.6%37
- Paint Pts / Game24.670
- % Pts in Paint31.9%57
- Fast Break Pts / Game3.752
- % Pts on Fast Break4.8%46
- Points off TOVs / Game13.385
- % Pts off TOVs17.2%75
- 1st Half Pts / Game36.484
- 2nd Half Pts / Game40.686
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %57.0%86
- Points / Shot1.3178
- 3-Point Att Rate38.0%70
- Assist Pct59.7%91
- Assists / 100 Poss25.891
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.38x91
- PF Drawn / Game19.759
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%51.0%36
- Opp True Shooting %54.4%49
- Opp Field Goal Pct43.8%51
- Opp 2-Point Pct46.6%76
- Opp 3-Point Pct38.9%3
- Opp 3PA Rate37.1%29
- Opp FT Att Rate28.8%90
- Opp Points / Shot1.2364
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game71.656
- Paint Pts Allowed24.037
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.730
- Pts off TOVs Allowed10.754
- Opp Assist Pct50.5%65
- TOVs Forced / Game12.140
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct75.4%97
- Turnovers Forced Pct19.5%56
- Steal Pct8.4%28
- Block Pct3.2%8
- Hakeem Pct11.6%10
- PF Efficiency0.87x92
- Steals / PF0.30x42
- Blocks / PF0.12x18
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #9Opp OREB%24.6%
- #35AST%59.7%
- #50TS%56.4%
- #52eFG%52.7%
- #76REB Diff+83
- #76Pts Diff+165
- #80TOV%16.8%
- #85Adj ORtg109.2
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
- #9Opp OREB%24.6%
- #35AST%59.7%
- #50TS%56.4%
- #52eFG%52.7%
- #76REB Diff+83
- #76Pts Diff+165
- #80TOV%16.8%
- #85Adj ORtg109.2
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
- #341Opp 3P%38.9%
- #239FTAR34.3%
- #237OREB%27.9%
- #223Opp eFG%51.0%
- #220SOS-2.1
- #215Opp TOV%17.5%
- #201Paint Pts %37.3%
- #1973PM Diff-10
Most Similar Seasons
to 2015-16- 1
South Dakota St.S. Dakota St. 2023-2419-13SummitMost alike in Tempo, Adj D, Opp TOV%91 - 2
Colgate 2021-2222-12PatriotMost alike in Adj D, TOV%, Adj O90 - 3
Chattanooga 2019-2018-13SouthernMost alike in OREB%, eFG%, TOV%90 - 4
Duquesne 2013-1413-17A10Most alike in Opp TOV%, Adj O, 3PA rate88 - 5
Utah St. 2021-2217-16MWCMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp OREB%, OREB%88 - 6
Montana 2018-1924-9Big SkyMost alike in TOV%, Adj O, FT rate86 - 7Ohio 2019-2015-15MACMost alike in Opp TOV%, Adj D, OREB%86
- 8
San FranciscoUSF 2019-2021-12WCCMost alike in TOV%, Tempo, Opp eFG%86 - 9
Mercer 2020-2115-11SouthernMost alike in Adj O, Adj D, OREB%86 - 10Utah St. 2015-1614-15MWCMost alike in Adj O, Opp eFG%, 3PA rate85
Schedule
Loading the schedule
NBNathanBootheSrJLJordanLaufJr
NateNavigatoFrSMStuckeyMosleySoZGZachGarberJrJSJaelanSanfordFrJWJonathanWilliamsJr
NickRogersFr
NateNavigatoFrSMStuckeyMosleySoZGZachGarberJrJSJaelanSanfordFrJWJonathanWilliamsJrFJFred JohnJr.Fr
CWChandlerWhiteFrTATaylorAdwayFr
NickRogersFr| N. BootheNathan Boothe | Sr | 6'9" | +0.984 | – | – | 56.8%74 | 29.9%98 | 19.5 | 9.0 | 3.2 | 36.8% | 83.1% |
| J. LaufJordan Lauf | Jr | 6'5" | +0.780 | – | – | 63.3%92 | 10.2%7 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 33.3% | 70.7% |
| N. NavigatoNate Navigato | Fr | 6'8" | +0.263 | – | – | 58.5%81 | 17.0%41 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 38.6% | 82.6% |
| S. MosleyStuckey Mosley | So | 6'3" | +0.158 | – | – | 53.2%56 | 19.5%60 | 10.0 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 37.1% | 76.8% |
| Z. GarberZach Garber | Jr | 6'10" | -0.152 | – | – | 69.2%96 | 15.2%28 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 0.0% | 71.9% |
| J. SanfordJaelan Sanford | Fr | 6'4" | -0.243 | – | – | 57.2%75 | 14.0%21 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 32.8% | 81.4% |
| J. WilliamsJonathan Williams | Jr | 6'4" | -0.533 | – | – | 56.0%70 | 28.4%96 | 17.7 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 38.3% | 69.7% |
| F. John Jr.Fred John Jr. | Fr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 56.4%72 | 21.8%74 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| C. WhiteChandler White | Fr | 6'2" | – | – | – | 37.5%12 | 30.8%98 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| T. AdwayTaylor Adway | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 57.3%75 | 15.0%27 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 14.3% |
| N. RogersNick Rogers | Fr | 6'1" | – | – | – | 43.1%19 | 16.7%39 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 25.0% | 65.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 19-15 | #124 | 3.366 | 114.577 | 111.141 | -1.161 | -4029 | -3624 | 30.2%42 | -8285 | 54.9%86 | 36.7%91 | 75.7%85 |
| 24-25 | 18-15 | #234 | -4.836 | 112.677 | 117.44 | -2.156 | -2932 | -964 | 30.3%50 | -4976 | 51.2%49 | 33.7%47 | 75.0%81 |
| 23-24 | 20-12 | #124 | 4.065 | 113.484 | 109.434 | -1.356 | +745 | -3523 | 29.3%50 | -7588 | 53.1%81 | 37.6%96 | 75.4%87 |
| 22-23 | 27-8 | #83 | 9.077 | 119.699 | 110.520 | -2.838 | +444 | +750 | 30.2%61 | -11693 | 56.5%99 | 39.5%100 | 77.0%94 |
| 21-22 | 26-8 | #73 | 10.780 | 112.590 | 101.864 | -3.143 | +16188 | -3822 | 30.4%68 | -2762 | 53.5%87 | 35.4%76 | 75.4%85 |
| 19-20 | 17-15 | #136 | 3.162 | 107.377 | 104.140 | -1.651 | +6064 | +3369 | 28.3%49 | +1337 | 51.2%67 | 36.6%90 | 74.6%82 |
| 18-19 | 25-8 | #55 | 11.184 | 110.382 | 99.380 | 0.564 | +12483 | +10198 | 28.6%47 | +3426 | 53.4%79 | 37.8%91 | 77.2%97 |
| 17-18 | 23-11 | #106 | 4.468 | 113.485 | 109.033 | -1.551 | +5765 | +8694 | 27.7%37 | +729 | 55.1%91 | 40.1%97 | 73.7%75 |
| 16-17 | 17-17 | #130 | 2.461 | 108.674 | 106.240 | -0.659 | +13383 | +5483 | 29.1%45 | +965 | 54.7%90 | 36.2%66 | 69.5%44 |
| 15-16 | 16-15 | #117 | 4.966 | 109.577 | 104.652 | -2.637 | +9778 | -446 | 27.9%29 | -1859 | 53.0%85 | 36.4%73 | 74.7%93 |
| 14-15 | 20-13 | #85 | 7.376 | 111.591 | 104.244 | 1.868 | +13084 | -3922 | 33.3%69 | +4422 | 52.3%82 | 36.6%77 | 74.2%93 |
| 13-14 | 26-7 | #101 | 6.171 | 115.593 | 109.527 | -1.151 | +8168 | -3926 | 35.3%86 | -11896 | 51.4%70 | 34.5%51 | 72.5%77 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
56.4%#48
Effective FG %
52.7%#51
3-Point %
36.3%#91
3PAR
38.0%#106
FTAR
34.3%#238
Assist %
59.7%#32
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.0%#212
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
27.3%#141
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
21 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0685D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.746249.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.367229.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.399421.4% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9959Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.772449.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.247629.6% of shots
Late 21s+1.157720.7% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.