Tulsa11-20

AmericanCoach: Eric Konkol

11-20NET#274

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dwon Odom	1,551	427	78.4%	+13.192	+11.196	−2.060	+5.696	+2.070	+0.246	+5.380	−3.080	+1.162	−0.148	+3.530
Keaston Willis	1,445	533	73.1%	−11.914	+1.560	+13.42	+5.092	−7.94	+1.132	+0.556	+3.218	−3.818	−3.68	+6.218
Braeden Carrington	1,135	842	57.4%	+1.156	+0.654	−0.652	−2.624	−1.538	−1.978	+8.590	−2.576	−2.030	−1.328	+3.928
Isaiah Barnes	1,108	869	56.0%	−11.516	−7.816	+3.630	−1.634	−4.018	+1.528	−1.344	+2.126	+0.254	−0.346	+2.634
Tyshawn Archie	1,064	914	53.8%	−1.944	−1.244	+0.646	−2.030	−0.944	−2.686	−4.924	+2.126	−1.834	+2.184	−5.578
Ian Smikle	992	986	50.2%	+6.676	−1.444	−8.086	+0.758	+0.556	+0.936	−0.548	−3.684	+4.086	+0.254	−3.066
Justin Amadi	705	1,272	35.7%	+18.598	+10.494	−8.186	+2.476	+8.9100	+0.246	+2.968	−1.768	+2.374	+2.184	+1.144
Jesaiah McWright	677	1,300	34.2%	−8.522	−4.130	+4.326	−1.536	+4.788	+3.38	−6.716	+3.614	−0.644	+0.866	−0.352
Jared Garcia	484	1,494	24.5%	−8.722	−4.130	+4.724	+0.454	−8.52	−2.180	−7.514	−0.656	−3.818	−0.936	+0.448
Matt Reed	392	1,586	19.8%	+3.966	+2.264	−1.758	−0.842	+1.364	+0.148	−0.250	+2.226	+0.354	+1.374	−10.292
Jaye Nash	195	1,783	9.8%	+4.368	−2.736	−7.184	−4.214	+5.892	+0.246	+10.194	−1.364	+5.894	+0.966	+4.226

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dwon Odom	1,551	427	78.4%	-4.740	105.640	110.342	50.8%46	29.2%44	17.3%44	36.1%66	49.9%54	68.8%50	14.4%32	34.8%34
Keaston Willis	1,445	533	73.1%	-10.830	103.636	114.432	51.0%48	26.4%32	17.6%42	35.1%64	51.4%46	67.5%44	13.5%24	35.7%32
Braeden Carrington	1,135	842	57.4%	-7.134	103.436	110.540	48.5%36	28.1%40	16.5%50	38.6%72	49.5%56	67.7%44	13.9%28	35.7%32
Isaiah Barnes	1,108	869	56.0%	-12.626	99.728	112.336	48.9%38	27.0%34	18.0%40	34.3%62	51.5%46	68.6%48	14.3%30	35.1%34
Tyshawn Archie	1,064	914	53.8%	-8.432	102.634	111.040	48.7%36	28.3%40	16.1%54	32.7%58	51.5%46	67.7%44	15.5%38	31.4%44
Ian Smikle	992	986	50.2%	-4.340	102.434	106.750	49.9%40	29.0%42	17.7%42	34.7%62	48.7%58	70.5%56	14.6%32	32.5%40
Justin Amadi	705	1,272	35.7%	4.354	109.952	105.554	51.1%48	34.4%64	17.4%44	36.8%68	49.4%56	70.0%54	15.8%40	34.8%34
Jesaiah McWright	677	1,300	34.2%	-13.126	100.430	113.534	48.6%36	31.8%54	19.5%28	30.6%52	52.9%38	68.1%46	15.0%34	33.8%38
Jared Garcia	484	1,494	24.5%	-14.224	100.128	114.332	49.9%40	22.3%20	15.7%56	29.2%48	50.1%50	65.7%36	13.8%26	34.3%36
Matt Reed	392	1,586	19.8%	-4.540	104.940	109.444	48.9%38	29.8%46	17.4%44	34.7%64	52.3%42	68.8%48	15.6%38	25.9%60
Jaye Nash	195	1,783	9.8%	-3.740	100.730	104.456	45.8%24	33.9%62	17.5%44	44.0%80	49.4%56	73.8%72	15.3%36	37.8%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dwon Odom	1,551	427	78.4%	-17.920	94.518	112.336	45.2%24	27.2%36	17.1%46	30.8%52	52.9%38	67.7%44	14.6%32	31.3%44
Keaston Willis	1,445	533	73.1%	1.148	102.132	101.066	46.0%26	34.3%64	16.5%50	34.5%62	48.2%62	71.3%60	17.1%50	29.5%50
Braeden Carrington	1,135	842	57.4%	-8.232	102.834	111.040	51.0%48	29.6%44	18.4%36	30.1%50	52.0%44	69.7%54	15.2%36	31.8%42
Isaiah Barnes	1,108	869	56.0%	-1.146	107.546	108.746	50.5%46	30.9%50	16.4%50	35.7%66	49.4%56	68.4%48	14.6%32	32.6%40
Tyshawn Archie	1,064	914	53.8%	-6.636	103.836	110.440	50.7%46	29.3%44	18.7%34	37.6%70	49.4%56	69.5%52	13.3%24	37.0%30
Ian Smikle	992	986	50.2%	-10.930	103.936	114.830	49.2%38	28.5%40	16.8%48	35.2%64	52.4%42	66.5%38	14.4%30	35.5%32
Justin Amadi	705	1,272	35.7%	-14.224	99.428	113.634	48.7%36	25.5%28	17.2%44	33.8%60	51.1%48	67.7%44	13.7%26	33.6%38
Jesaiah McWright	677	1,300	34.2%	-4.640	104.638	109.244	50.1%46	27.1%34	16.1%54	37.2%68	49.3%56	68.8%48	14.2%30	34.1%36
Jared Garcia	484	1,494	24.5%	-5.438	104.238	109.644	49.5%40	30.8%50	17.8%40	36.8%68	50.7%50	69.5%52	14.7%32	33.9%36
Matt Reed	392	1,586	19.8%	-8.332	102.734	111.140	49.7%40	28.5%40	17.3%44	35.0%64	50.1%50	68.5%48	14.2%30	36.1%32
Jaye Nash	195	1,783	9.8%	-8.034	103.436	111.438	50.0%40	28.1%40	17.3%44	33.9%60	50.7%50	68.0%46	14.4%30	33.6%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.