Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
CAA
William & Mary logo

William & Mary

21-11NET#178Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #263Coach: Dane Fischer
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WHigh Point logoWAmerican logoWWofford logoWHampton logoLOklahoma logoLStanford logoWMorehead St. logoLBuffalo logoWOld Dominion logoWFairfield logoWGOLSaint Joseph's logoLSaint Francis logoWElon logoWHofstra logoWNortheastern logoWUNC Wilmington logoWCharleston logoWDelaware logoLDrexel logoWJames Madison logoLTowson logoWNortheastern logoLHofstra logoLCharleston logoLUNC Wilmington logoWDrexel logoWDelaware logoWTowson logoWJames Madison logoWElon logoLElon logo

Team Stats

32 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating6.566
  • Offensive Rating186.999
  • Defensive Rating180.41
  • Pace38.31
  • Effective FG%53.2%88
  • Off Rebound Pct24.6%20
  • Turnover Pct32.9%2
  • FT Attempt Rate30.7%36

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct65.6%79
  • Point Margin / Game2.557
  • Points / Game71.555
  • Points Allowed / Game69.052
  • 1st Half Margin1.962
  • 2nd Half Margin0.648
  • Avg Largest Lead13.066
  • Avg Largest Deficit8.075

Box Score

  • Points / Game71.555
  • Rebounds / Game36.060
  • Assists / Game13.663
  • ORebs / Game8.317
  • DRebs / Game27.789
  • Steals / Game4.31
  • Blocks / Game4.079
  • Turnovers / Game12.664
  • PFs / Game15.686

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game25.760
  • FGAs / Game55.317
  • Field Goal Pct46.4%88
  • 2PMs / Game18.257
  • 2PAs / Game33.826
  • 2-Point Pct54.0%91
  • 3PMs / Game7.557
  • 3PAs / Game21.650
  • 3-Point Pct34.6%70
  • FTMs / Game12.742
  • FTAs / Game17.025
  • Free Throw Pct74.4%80

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s51.0%53
  • % Pts from 3s31.3%57
  • % Pts from FTs17.7%36
  • Paint Pts / Game25.084
  • % Pts in Paint35.0%84
  • Fast Break Pts / Game5.341
  • % Pts on Fast Break7.4%39
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.022
  • % Pts off TOVs14.0%21
  • 1st Half Pts / Game34.769
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game36.846

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %56.9%88
  • Points / Shot1.2981
  • 3-Point Att Rate39.0%61
  • Assist Pct52.9%57
  • Assists / 100 Poss35.599
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.08x70
  • PF Drawn / Game16.523

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%49.5%51
  • Opp True Shooting %52.8%60
  • Opp Field Goal Pct43.2%51
  • Opp 2-Point Pct47.4%75
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.5%17
  • Opp 3PA Rate35.5%68
  • Opp FT Att Rate26.5%88
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1871

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game69.052
  • Paint Pts Allowed24.021
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed7.523
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed13.919
  • Opp Assist Pct44.6%89
  • TOVs Forced / Game9.60

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct76.3%93
  • Turnovers Forced Pct25.9%95
  • Steal Pct11.3%79
  • Block Pct10.5%100
  • Hakeem Pct21.7%98
  • PF Efficiency0.98x66
  • Steals / PF0.28x8
  • Blocks / PF0.26x88

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #22Opp OREB%23.3%
  • #42eFG%53.2%
  • #43TS%56.4%
  • #58REB Diff+133
  • #96Paint Pts %43.0%
  • #1113P%34.6%
  • #151AST%52.9%
  • #154Pts Diff+80
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #349Opp TOV%14.6%
  • #282Opp 3P%34.8%
  • #250FB Pts %9.1%
  • #246OREB%26.1%
  • #226FTAR30.7%
  • #220SOS-3.2
  • #208Adj DRtg103.9
  • #169PO TOV Diff-126
Game Log
Loading game log…
NKNathanKnightSrLuke Loewe headshotLukeLoeweJrBryce Barnes headshotBryceBarnesSrAndy Van Vliet headshotAndy VanVlietSrThornton Scott headshotThorntonScottSo
Quinn Blair headshotQuinnBlairSo
Tyler Hamilton headshotTylerHamiltonSr
JWJiharWilliamsJr
Mehkel Harvey headshotMehkelHarveySo
AWAustinWashburnSo
MDMiodragDronjakJr
RHRainersHermanovskisFr
Miguel Ayesa headshotMiguelAyesaFrThatcher Stone headshotThatcherStoneFr
N. KnightSr6'10"+2.09761.3%8234.4%9920.710.51.830.5%77.8%
L. LoeweJr6'4"+0.76466.1%9015.2%3010.72.11.745.3%70.3%
B. BarnesSr5'11"+0.55552.0%4321.1%728.32.73.435.7%73.6%
A. Van VlietSr7'0"+0.34455.2%5923.4%8313.28.71.536.1%66.7%
T. ScottSo6'4"+0.24150.9%3719.7%627.33.24.432.9%78.8%
Q. BlairSo6'6"-0.22356.6%6616.1%364.82.10.528.6%78.9%
T. HamiltonSr6'4"-0.51245.7%1912.6%163.22.71.320.0%78.0%
J. WilliamsJr6'5"56.4%6517.9%501.90.70.612.5%0.0%
M. HarveySo6'9"143.6%10012.0%131.21.30.00.0%25.0%
A. WashburnSo6'3"119.7%9926.0%911.50.50.30.0%50.0%
M. DronjakJr6'2"39.4%1001.70.30.00.0%0.0%
R. HermanovskisFr6'4"55.6%617.2%41.21.30.535.0%60.0%
M. AyesaFr6'4"56.6%6613.5%204.60.90.437.7%0.0%
T. StoneFr6'6"76.6%9517.7%480.90.80.10.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
William & Mary logo25-2620-12#1273.165111.765108.660-2.947-2930-302626.8%12-668155.1%8833.2%3874.4%72
William & Mary logo24-2517-15#228-4.338108.053112.324-3.742-4425+709026.9%22-65054.4%8535.0%6772.3%53
William & Mary logo23-2410-23#315-11.913102.228114.07-5.224-3133+669028.1%38+352649.0%2632.3%2470.2%27
William & Mary logo22-2313-20#309-10.815102.733113.47-3.926-1639+196129.2%52+253050.2%3936.7%8768.2%17
William & Mary logo21-225-27#336-15.8693.53109.321-1.057-1439-481527.4%41+111246.2%830.8%1370.5%41
William & Mary logo19-2021-11#178-0.349103.656103.941-3.238+13383+55326.1%30+87553.2%8834.6%7074.4%80
William & Mary logo18-1914-17#224-4.537104.144108.628-1.747-244-14624.7%16+521654.6%9134.6%5466.8%12
William & Mary logo17-1819-12#1531.556116.193114.66-0.956+1549+779322.4%4+501560.5%10043.4%10081.0%100
William & Mary logo16-1717-14#1362.461111.787109.419-0.659+4662+136026.3%19+452156.9%9838.2%8869.2%42
William & Mary logo15-1618-11#937.373111.586104.2541.065+6768-104125.5%13+24854.9%9536.9%8171.9%71
William & Mary logo14-1518-13#946.473111.892105.437-0.953-1242+508525.1%6+34656.8%9939.8%9773.4%88
William & Mary logo13-1419-11#1580.555112.487111.914-1.745-8820+578824.8%4+14956.0%9839.9%9969.4%47

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
56.4%#40
Effective FG %
53.2%#41
3-Point %
34.6%#105
3PAR
39.0%#137
FTAR
30.7%#225
Assist %
52.9%#151

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
29.2%#301
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
23.7%#100
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

26 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 42.4% of shots at 1.68 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0942.4%1.68Middle (11–20s): 27.1% of shots at 1.05 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0427.1%1.05Late (21s+): 30.5% of shots at 0.77 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9730.5%0.77SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 35.1% of shots at 0.96 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0735.1%0.96Middle (11–20s): 35.2% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0235.2%0.97Late (21s+): 29.7% of shots at 1.01 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9529.7%1.01SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

18 games
Created byFinished by
Bryce Barnes → Nathan Knight: 111 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 103 from three)Bryce Barnes → Andy Van Vliet: 17 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 9 from three)Bryce Barnes → Luke Loewe: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Bryce Barnes → Miguel Ayesa: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Bryce Barnes → Thornton Scott: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Thornton Scott → Nathan Knight: 15 assisted baskets (13 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Thornton Scott → Andy Van Vliet: 11 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 7 from three)Thornton Scott → Luke Loewe: 7 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Thornton Scott → Miguel Ayesa: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Thornton Scott → Quinn Blair: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Luke Loewe → Nathan Knight: 8 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Luke Loewe → Andy Van Vliet: 11 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 4 from three)Andy Van Vliet → Nathan Knight: 6 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Nathan Knight → Luke Loewe: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Barnes146 astScott45 astLoewe19 astVan VlietKnightKnight140 madeVan Vliet39 madeLoewe19 madeAyesaBlairScott
Barnes is the least-assisted finisher — 82% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.