Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo

William & Mary7-10

CAACoach: Dane Fischer

7-10NET#282
Schedule
LOld Dominion logoOld Dominion logoWGeorge Washington logoGeorge Washington logoWHampton logoHampton logoLHigh Point logoHigh Point logoLVirginia logoVirginia logoLHofstra logoHofstra logoLHofstra logoHofstra logoWDelaware logoDelaware logoLDrexel logoDrexel logoWDrexel logoDrexel logoLDrexel logoDrexel logoWTowson logoTowson logoWTowson logoTowson logoLElon logoElon logoLElon logoElon logoWUNC Wilmington logoUNC Wilmington logoLNortheastern logoNortheastern logo

Team Stats

17 games
  • Net Rating-13.012
  • Offensive Rating116.883
  • Defensive Rating129.84
  • Pace55.54
  • Effective FG%46.1%12
  • Off Rebound Pct28.6%57
  • Turnover Pct24.6%8
  • FT Attempt Rate32.0%55

Team Stats

17 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-13.012
  • Offensive Rating116.883
  • Defensive Rating129.84
  • Pace55.54
  • Effective FG%46.1%12
  • Off Rebound Pct28.6%57
  • Turnover Pct24.6%8
  • FT Attempt Rate32.0%55

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct41.2%36
  • Point Margin / Game-7.215
  • Points / Game64.813
  • Points Allowed / Game72.040
  • 1st Half Margin-5.013
  • 2nd Half Margin-2.224
  • Avg Largest Lead7.219
  • Avg Largest Deficit16.211

Box Score

  • Points / Game64.813
  • Rebounds / Game33.833
  • Assists / Game10.811
  • ORebs / Game10.058
  • DRebs / Game23.824
  • Steals / Game5.320
  • Blocks / Game3.360
  • Turnovers / Game13.642
  • PFs / Game15.686

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game22.811
  • FGAs / Game55.826
  • Field Goal Pct40.9%14
  • 2PMs / Game17.136
  • 2PAs / Game35.646
  • 2-Point Pct47.9%29
  • 3PMs / Game5.814
  • 3PAs / Game20.133
  • 3-Point Pct28.7%3
  • FTMs / Game13.459
  • FTAs / Game17.845
  • Free Throw Pct74.9%84

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s52.7%69
  • % Pts from 3s26.7%20
  • % Pts from FTs20.6%81
  • Paint Pts / Game23.986
  • % Pts in Paint36.9%95
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.947
  • % Pts on Fast Break7.5%53
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.916
  • % Pts off TOVs13.8%21
  • 1st Half Pts / Game29.49
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game34.823

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %50.9%17
  • Points / Shot1.1619
  • 3-Point Att Rate36.1%38
  • Assist Pct47.2%22
  • Assists / 100 Poss19.445
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.79x14
  • PF Drawn / Game17.246

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.9%41
  • Opp True Shooting %54.0%47
  • Opp Field Goal Pct45.3%29
  • Opp 2-Point Pct52.0%26
  • Opp 3-Point Pct32.6%69
  • Opp 3PA Rate34.7%74
  • Opp FT Att Rate23.6%95
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1971

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game72.040
  • Paint Pts Allowed24.715
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.829
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.444
  • Opp Assist Pct52.7%44
  • TOVs Forced / Game11.513

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct68.2%12
  • Turnovers Forced Pct20.7%64
  • Steal Pct9.5%46
  • Block Pct5.9%78
  • Hakeem Pct15.5%65
  • PF Efficiency0.90x85
  • Steals / PF0.34x38
  • Blocks / PF0.21x72

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 265 D-I teams
  • #20Paint Pts %47.9%
  • #108Opp 3P%32.6%
  • #149OREB%28.6%
  • #159FTAR32.0%
  • #192FB Pts %9.8%
  • #209Opp eFG%50.9%
  • #212SOS-2.0
  • #231REB Diff-39
Where they rank bestof 265 D-I teams
  • #20Paint Pts %47.9%
  • #108Opp 3P%32.6%
  • #149OREB%28.6%
  • #159FTAR32.0%
  • #192FB Pts %9.8%
  • #209Opp eFG%50.9%
  • #212SOS-2.0
  • #231REB Diff-39
Where they rank worstof 265 D-I teams
  • #3383P%28.7%
  • #308eFG%46.1%
  • #304Opp OREB%31.8%
  • #295Opp TOV%17.0%
  • #290TS%50.4%
  • #286Adj ORtg96.5
  • #276Pts Diff-123
  • #273AST%47.2%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2020-21
Find Similar
  1. 1Tennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech 2025-2610-18OVC91
  2. 2SIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville 2017-189-21OVC90
  3. 3Morehead St. logoMorehead St. logoMorehead St. 2019-2011-19OVC89
  4. 4McNeese St. logoMcNeese St. logoMcNeese St. 2015-167-19Southland87
  5. 5Louisville logoLouisville logoLouisville 2022-234-28ACC87
  6. 6Tennessee St. logoTennessee St. logoTennessee St. 2013-144-25OVC87
  7. 7East Tennessee St. logoEast Tennessee St. logoEast Tennessee St. 2022-2310-20Southern87
  8. 8Tulane logoTulane logoTulane 2018-194-27American87
  9. 9Norfolk St. logoNorfolk St. logoNorfolk St. 2016-1715-17MEAC86
  10. 10Louisiana Monroe logoLouisiana Monroe 2022-238-21Sun Belt86
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Luke Loewe headshotLukeLoeweSrBen Wight headshotBenWightFr
Mehkel Harvey headshotMehkelHarveyJr
Connor Kochera headshotConnorKocheraFr
Quinn Blair headshotQuinnBlairJr
JMJakeMilkereitFr
Thornton Scott headshotThorntonScottJrYuri Covington headshotYuriCovingtonFr
AWAustinWashburnJr
MDMiodragDronjakSr
RHRainersHermanovskisSo
Miguel Ayesa headshotMiguelAyesaSoThatcher Stone headshotThatcherStoneSo
KJKurt SamuelsJr.Fr
L. LoeweSr6'4"+0.671––54.4%5522.9%8016.23.43.229.8%85.7%
B. WightFr6'9"-0.048––53.4%5014.6%274.43.40.620.0%66.7%
M. HarveyJr6'9"-0.143––52.7%4714.0%244.56.00.50.0%52.2%
C. KocheraFr6'5"-0.431––56.8%6521.8%7513.44.81.435.7%79.2%
Q. BlairJr6'7"-0.528––53.6%5123.0%8111.75.80.827.9%76.8%
J. MilkereitFr6'5"-1.35––33.0%917.2%442.92.20.818.5%71.4%
T. ScottJr6'5"-1.53––27.2%713.1%191.81.83.011.1%100.0%
Y. CovingtonFr6'1"-2.40––47.2%2624.8%879.53.52.133.3%80.6%
A. WashburnJr6'4"–––17.4%520.8%700.30.30.30.0%50.0%
M. DronjakSr6'3"––––0.0%20.00.00.00.0%0.0%
R. HermanovskisSo6'4"–––29.6%78.1%70.40.10.30.0%50.0%
M. AyesaSo6'5"–––47.8%2816.2%372.90.10.431.3%0.0%
T. StoneSo6'6"–––42.1%1613.3%202.11.60.510.0%58.8%
K. Samuels Jr.Fr6'5"––––0.0%20.00.00.00.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo25-2620-12#1303.165111.765108.660-2.947-2930-302626.8%12-668155.1%8833.2%3874.4%72
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo24-2517-15#223-4.338108.053112.324-3.742-4425+709026.9%22-65054.4%8535.0%6772.3%53
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo23-2410-23#317-11.913102.228114.07-5.224-3133+669028.1%38+352649.0%2632.3%2470.2%27
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo22-2313-20#326-10.815102.733113.47-3.926-1639+196129.2%52+253050.2%3936.7%8768.2%17
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo21-225-27#338-15.8693.53109.321-1.057-1439-481527.4%41+111246.2%830.8%1370.5%41
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo19-2021-11#182-0.349103.656103.941-3.238+13383+55326.1%30+87553.2%8834.6%7074.4%80
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo18-1914-17#227-4.537104.144108.628-1.747-244-14624.7%16+521654.6%9134.6%5466.8%12
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo17-1819-12#1671.556116.193114.66-0.956+1549+779322.4%4+501560.5%10043.4%10081.0%100
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo16-1717-14#1312.461111.787109.419-0.659+4662+136026.3%19+452156.9%9838.2%8869.2%42
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo15-1618-11#877.373111.586104.2541.065+6768-104125.5%13+24854.9%9536.9%8171.9%71
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo14-1518-13#976.473111.892105.437-0.953-1242+508525.1%6+34656.8%9939.8%9773.4%88
William & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logo13-1419-11#1620.555112.487111.914-1.745-8820+578824.8%4+14956.0%9839.9%9969.4%47

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
50.4%#289
Effective FG %
46.1%#307
3-Point %
28.7%#337
3PAR
36.1%#214
FTAR
32.0%#158
Assist %
47.2%#271

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
47.6%#6
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
14.5%#5
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

9 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 38.8% of shots at 0.77 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9738.8%0.77Middle (11–20s): 38.6% of shots at 1.09 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0638.6%1.09Late (21s+): 22.6% of shots at 0.93 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0022.6%0.93SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9312D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.77438.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.096438.6% of shots
Late 21s+0.933122.6% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 35.8% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9735.8%0.97Middle (11–20s): 34.5% of shots at 1.05 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0634.5%1.05Late (21s+): 29.7% of shots at 0.98 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0029.7%0.98SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0053Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.975735.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.055134.5% of shots
Late 21s+0.985429.7% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.