Wofford14-15

SouthernCoach: Dwight Perry

14-15NET#196

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Corey Tripp	1,419	434	76.6%	+8.178	−0.050	−8.186	−1.732	+1.666	−2.784	−2.638	−6.694	+4.688	−4.56	−1.256
Dillon Bailey	1,269	585	68.5%	−8.422	−4.726	+3.730	−2.426	−3.920	−2.178	+7.386	+3.516	+4.588	−1.528	+2.336
Kyler Filewich	1,193	660	64.4%	+2.762	−5.822	−8.586	−2.922	+0.052	+0.442	−6.320	−2.674	+4.588	−1.628	−15.196
Jackson Sivills	1,130	723	61.0%	+4.266	+5.176	+0.944	+1.566	−1.142	−1.976	+0.656	+0.940	+3.078	−1.726	+3.630
Chase Cormier	876	977	47.3%	+4.668	+2.262	−2.462	+4.088	−3.522	+1.034	+3.772	+0.150	−1.042	+2.384	+0.346
Chase Martin	807	1,046	43.5%	−3.438	−2.040	+1.442	−1.536	−1.934	−1.064	−2.538	+0.050	+0.052	+0.762	−1.054
Quentin Meza	772	1,081	41.7%	−9.820	−4.130	+5.820	−1.534	−0.548	+1.922	−5.522	+3.814	−3.024	+2.282	−1.456
Jeremy Lorenz	724	1,129	39.1%	−0.648	−6.918	−6.480	−2.130	+3.380	+3.88	+3.672	−7.896	−2.430	−1.034	+4.624
Anthony Arrington	572	1,281	30.9%	+3.364	+6.982	+3.530	+2.172	+7.296	+1.230	+1.258	+2.326	−3.024	+0.964	+3.630
Belal El Shakery	497	1,357	26.8%	+2.762	+11.194	+8.412	+4.690	−0.448	−1.976	−1.244	+4.98	−7.36	+3.592	+4.824

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Corey Tripp	1,419	434	76.6%	0.346	109.752	109.342	53.1%60	32.5%58	16.9%46	27.1%42	49.5%54	72.3%66	13.2%24	34.2%34
Dillon Bailey	1,269	585	68.5%	-4.240	108.248	112.434	52.8%58	30.9%52	16.9%46	30.0%50	52.1%40	72.8%68	13.8%28	35.2%32
Kyler Filewich	1,193	660	64.4%	-0.746	107.646	108.346	52.5%58	32.1%56	17.7%42	25.4%36	50.2%48	72.9%68	13.7%28	29.4%48
Jackson Sivills	1,130	723	61.0%	0.146	111.758	111.636	54.1%64	31.7%54	16.8%46	27.9%44	51.4%44	72.5%66	13.6%26	35.8%30
Chase Cormier	876	977	47.3%	0.948	110.954	110.040	55.7%70	30.2%48	18.0%38	29.7%50	51.1%46	70.8%58	15.5%40	34.6%32
Chase Martin	807	1,046	43.5%	-3.540	108.650	112.136	52.7%58	31.0%52	17.0%46	26.3%38	51.1%46	71.4%60	14.6%34	33.9%34
Quentin Meza	772	1,081	41.7%	-7.334	107.346	114.630	52.6%58	31.8%56	18.6%34	24.5%34	53.3%36	69.6%52	15.5%40	33.6%34
Jeremy Lorenz	724	1,129	39.1%	-1.944	105.542	107.348	52.2%56	34.2%64	19.9%26	29.9%50	46.3%68	70.0%54	13.6%26	37.3%26
Anthony Arrington	572	1,281	30.9%	0.748	114.464	113.732	55.0%68	37.1%74	18.3%36	28.5%46	52.6%38	69.3%52	14.8%36	36.9%28
Belal El Shakery	497	1,357	26.8%	0.448	117.872	117.424	56.9%76	31.8%56	16.1%52	26.7%40	54.7%30	65.9%36	16.8%48	38.0%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Corey Tripp	1,419	434	76.6%	-7.734	109.752	117.524	54.9%68	30.9%52	19.6%28	29.6%50	56.2%24	67.7%44	17.6%54	35.4%30
Dillon Bailey	1,269	585	68.5%	4.254	112.960	108.744	55.1%68	34.8%66	19.0%32	22.7%30	48.6%58	68.3%48	15.3%38	32.9%38
Kyler Filewich	1,193	660	64.4%	-3.440	113.460	116.826	55.4%70	32.1%56	17.3%44	31.8%56	52.8%38	68.3%48	15.2%38	44.5%16
Jackson Sivills	1,130	723	61.0%	-4.140	106.644	110.740	52.6%58	32.8%58	18.7%34	27.3%42	50.5%48	69.5%52	15.2%38	32.3%38
Chase Cormier	876	977	47.3%	-3.740	108.750	112.434	51.7%54	33.7%64	17.1%46	25.9%38	51.0%46	71.8%64	13.1%24	34.3%34
Chase Martin	807	1,046	43.5%	-0.146	110.654	110.740	54.2%64	33.0%58	18.0%40	28.7%46	51.0%46	71.3%60	13.9%30	34.9%32
Quentin Meza	772	1,081	41.7%	2.550	111.456	108.944	54.2%64	32.3%56	16.7%48	29.9%50	49.5%54	72.5%66	13.3%26	35.0%32
Jeremy Lorenz	724	1,129	39.1%	-1.344	112.458	113.732	54.3%66	30.9%52	16.0%52	26.3%38	54.1%32	72.3%66	14.6%34	32.7%38
Anthony Arrington	572	1,281	30.9%	-2.642	107.646	110.240	52.9%58	29.9%46	17.2%44	27.3%42	50.4%48	72.3%66	13.9%30	33.4%34
Belal El Shakery	497	1,357	26.8%	-2.342	106.744	109.044	52.3%56	32.2%56	18.1%38	28.0%44	49.7%54	73.1%70	13.3%26	33.2%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.