Maryland28-7

Big 10Coach: Mark Turgeon

28-7NET#37

Schedule

R1W

R2L

Team Stats

35 games

Net Rating8.783
Offensive Rating106.230
Defensive Rating97.593
Pace65.087
Effective FG%51.2%77
Off Rebound Pct28.9%29
Turnover Pct18.9%75
FT Attempt Rate44.5%93

Team Stats

35 games

ViewSplit

Core Stats

Net Rating8.783
Offensive Rating106.230
Defensive Rating97.593
Pace65.087
Effective FG%51.2%77
Off Rebound Pct28.9%29
Turnover Pct18.9%75
FT Attempt Rate44.5%93

Results & Margin

Win Pct80.0%96
Point Margin / Game5.785
Points / Game69.170
Points Allowed / Game63.476
1st Half Margin3.583
2nd Half Margin2.177
Avg Largest Lead––
Avg Largest Deficit––

Box Score

Points / Game69.170
Rebounds / Game34.965
Assists / Game10.718
ORebs / Game9.017
DRebs / Game26.095
Steals / Game4.89
Blocks / Game4.383
Turnovers / Game12.355
PFs / Game16.783

Shooting

FGMs / Game22.332
FGAs / Game50.814
Field Goal Pct44.0%67
2PMs / Game14.915
2PAs / Game31.110
2-Point Pct48.0%56
3PMs / Game7.482
3PAs / Game19.669
3-Point Pct37.6%87
FTMs / Game17.196
FTAs / Game22.685
Free Throw Pct75.6%96

Scoring Breakdown

% Pts from 2s43.3%5
% Pts from 3s32.0%77
% Pts from FTs24.7%95
Paint Pts / Game9.217
% Pts in Paint13.3%16
Fast Break Pts / Game1.516
% Pts on Fast Break2.1%15
Points off TOVs / Game5.212
% Pts off TOVs7.5%10
1st Half Pts / Game32.675
2nd Half Pts / Game35.964

Adv Offense

True Shooting %56.9%88
Points / Shot1.3694
3-Point Att Rate38.7%83
Assist Pct48.1%22
Assists / 100 Poss16.57
Ast/Tov Ratio0.87x27
PF Drawn / Game20.292

Opponent Shooting

Opp Effective FG%45.5%89
Opp True Shooting %48.7%96
Opp Field Goal Pct39.5%93
Opp 2-Point Pct44.0%88
Opp 3-Point Pct31.9%83
Opp 3PA Rate37.5%21
Opp FT Att Rate28.1%96
Opp Points / Shot1.0998

Defense Allowed

Points Allowed / Game63.476
Paint Pts Allowed6.689
Fast Break Pts Allowed1.486
Pts off TOVs Allowed4.986
Opp Assist Pct48.1%87
TOVs Forced / Game11.220

Adv Defense

Def Rebound Pct69.5%59
Turnovers Forced Pct17.2%6
Steal Pct7.4%4
Block Pct6.6%68
Hakeem Pct14.1%25
PF Efficiency0.83x97
Steals / PF0.29x23
Blocks / PF0.26x90

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams

#24FTAR44.5%
#32SOS8.6
#38Opp eFG%45.5%
#41Adj DRtg94.7
#43TS%56.2%
#483P%37.6%
#50Pts Diff+199
#57Opp 3P%31.9%

Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams

#24FTAR44.5%
#32SOS8.6
#38Opp eFG%45.5%
#41Adj DRtg94.7
#43TS%56.2%
#483P%37.6%
#50Pts Diff+199
#57Opp 3P%31.9%

Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams

#280Opp TOV%17.2%
#275AST%48.1%
#251OREB%28.9%
#155TOV%18.9%
#141Opp OREB%30.5%
#1203PM Diff+16
#104REB Diff+53
#80eFG%51.2%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2014-15

Find Similar

1Wyoming 2021-2224-9MWCMost alike in FT rate, Adj O, 3PA rate93
2SMU 2021-2224-9AmericanMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, eFG%90
3Saint Joseph's 2013-1424-10A10Most alike in OREB%, Tempo, 3PA rate85
4Vanderbilt 2015-1619-14SECMost alike in Opp OREB%, OREB%, Tempo84
5Georgetown 2015-1615-18Big EastMost alike in Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%, Tempo84
6Boise St. 2016-1718-12MWCMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp TOV%, TOV%84
7Alabama 2014-1518-15SECMost alike in Adj O, TOV%, FT rate84
8Missouri 2020-2116-10SECMost alike in Adj O, TOV%, Adj D82
9Louisville 2018-1920-14ACCMost alike in 3PA rate, Tempo, Opp eFG%82
10Oklahoma 2023-2420-12Big 12Most alike in Adj D, Opp eFG%, Tempo80

Schedule

Loading the schedule

MTMeloTrimbleFr

JakeLaymanJr DWDezWellsSr DDDamonteDoddSo ESEvanSmotryczSr JNJaredNickensFr RPRichaudPackSr

JGJonathanGrahamSr

SBSpencerBarksSr

JSJacobSusskindSr

VRVarunRamSr

TATrevorAmzmannN/A

DionWileyFr MCMichalCekovskyFr


M. TrimbleMelo Trimble	Fr	6'3"	+1.997	–	–	64.0%91	24.7%88	16.2	3.9	3.0	41.2%	86.3%
J. LaymanJake Layman	Jr	6'8"	+1.391	–	–	59.7%82	22.4%78	12.5	5.8	1.4	37.8%	75.2%
D. WellsDez Wells	Sr	6'5"	+1.085	–	–	56.6%70	31.0%98	15.1	5.3	2.8	51.0%	80.6%
D. DoddDamonte Dodd	So	6'9"	+1.085	–	–	63.2%90	15.9%35	4.0	3.8	0.6	0.0%	62.7%
E. SmotryczEvan Smotrycz	Sr	6'9"	+0.983	–	–	45.9%23	17.7%47	4.7	4.1	1.3	29.0%	76.2%
J. NickensJared Nickens	Fr	6'7"	+0.983	–	–	54.2%59	15.0%28	6.1	1.4	0.4	39.0%	73.7%
R. PackRichaud Pack	Sr	6'4"	+0.673	–	–	52.6%52	13.5%20	5.8	3.3	1.2	32.6%	69.7%
J. GrahamJonathan Graham	Sr	6'8"	–	–	–	54.3%60	13.6%20	2.3	2.8	0.1	0.0%	51.9%
S. BarksSpencer Barks	Sr	6'9"	–	–	–	0.0%1	12.7%16	0.0	0.4	0.0	0.0%	0.0%
J. SusskindJacob Susskind	Sr	6'5"	–	–	–	0.0%1	21.0%70	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0%	0.0%
V. RamVarun Ram	Sr	5'9"	–	–	–	47.0%26	14.9%28	0.4	0.2	0.1	0.0%	100.0%
T. AmzmannTrevor Amzmann	N/A	5'11"	–	–	–	–	15.5%32	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.0%	0.0%
D. WileyDion Wiley	Fr	6'4"	–	–	–	50.4%40	19.3%58	4.1	1.5	0.6	32.9%	63.9%
M. CekovskyMichal Cekovsky	Fr	7'1"	–	–	–	49.8%37	14.0%22	2.6	2.5	0.1	0.0%	28.6%

						Ratings (ADJUSTED)				Four Factors				Shooting
			Conf	Coach
25-26	12-21	4-16	B10	Buzz Williams	#157	0.855	110.457	109.651	12.094	+6864	-1436	33.8%76	+808	48.1%9	31.6%15	72.2%45
24-254	27-9	14-6	B10	Kevin Willard	#8	26.698	119.595	92.999	10.087	+8366	+5682	30.7%53	-14796	53.6%79	37.3%92	75.0%79
23-24	16-17	7-13	B10	Kevin Willard	#72	10.080	107.354	97.394	7.782	+3254	+2162	31.7%72	-2964	46.7%8	28.9%3	72.0%50
22-238	22-13	11-9	B10	Kevin Willard	#23	16.294	113.190	96.892	8.692	+5156	+3673	30.0%59	-4472	50.8%46	32.8%29	73.2%67
21-22	15-17	7-13	B10	Danny Manning	#88	8.476	110.885	102.461	10.096	+546	-4318	27.3%38	+1736	49.4%33	32.6%30	75.9%90
19-20	24-7	14-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#15	18.296	111.693	93.494	10.197	+12983	+1157	31.5%79	-1257	48.6%30	31.1%18	74.7%82
18-196	23-11	13-7	B10	Mark Turgeon	#25	16.893	113.292	96.491	10.995	+28698	-543	34.1%91	+1203	51.4%57	34.9%57	74.3%85
17-18	19-13	8-10	B10	Mark Turgeon	#31	14.690	113.484	98.890	8.087	+15588	-1541	31.6%74	+876	54.6%87	37.1%78	75.5%88
16-176	24-9	12-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#50	12.686	111.887	99.281	7.683	+1247	+6086	31.1%66	+943	52.3%71	35.9%62	69.9%47
15-165	26-9	12-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#21	19.194	115.894	96.790	8.589	+9474	+2767	29.3%44	+5717	55.4%96	36.1%67	76.8%98
14-154	28-7	14-4	B10	Mark Turgeon	#37	14.491	109.385	94.989	8.991	+5364	+1661	28.9%24	+4025	51.2%75	37.6%84	75.6%96
13-14	17-15	9-9	ACC	Mark Turgeon	#52	11.986	108.869	96.991	9.294	+10681	+3272	33.5%68	-250	49.1%41	34.2%48	67.9%30

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I

True Shooting %

56.2%#43

Effective FG %

51.2%#80

3-Point %

37.6%#48

3PAR

38.7%#62

FTAR

44.5%#24

Assist %

48.1%#275

Shot Profile

vs D-I

Rim rateshare of shots at the rim

32.6%#230

Rim FG %–

Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot

29.2%#147

Mid-range FG %–

Corner 3 share–

Corner 3 FG %–

Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

27 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense

Pts/Shot1.0173D-I 0.96

Early 0–10s0.704447.7% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.337625.6% of shots

Late 21s+1.246726.7% of shots

Defense

Pts/Shot0.8894Allowed, D-I 0.98

Early 0–10s0.658052.7% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.139324.2% of shots

Late 21s+1.166723.1% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 14-15. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 14-15. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.