Maryland26-9

Big 10Coach: Mark Turgeon

26-9NET#21

Schedule

R1W

R2W

S16L

Team Stats

35 games

Net Rating12.690
Offensive Rating112.461
Defensive Rating99.889
Pace66.959
Effective FG%55.2%96
Off Rebound Pct29.1%46
Turnover Pct19.0%53
FT Attempt Rate37.0%53

Team Stats

35 games

ViewSplit

Core Stats

Net Rating12.690
Offensive Rating112.461
Defensive Rating99.889
Pace66.959
Effective FG%55.2%96
Off Rebound Pct29.1%46
Turnover Pct19.0%53
FT Attempt Rate37.0%53

Results & Margin

Win Pct74.3%91
Point Margin / Game8.490
Points / Game75.270
Points Allowed / Game66.886
1st Half Margin3.884
2nd Half Margin4.693
Avg Largest Lead15.288
Avg Largest Deficit6.392

Box Score

Points / Game75.270
Rebounds / Game35.038
Assists / Game13.661
ORebs / Game8.917
DRebs / Game26.275
Steals / Game5.742
Blocks / Game5.497
Turnovers / Game12.749
PFs / Game16.991

Shooting

FGMs / Game26.170
FGAs / Game54.111
Field Goal Pct48.3%96
2PMs / Game18.661
2PAs / Game33.413
2-Point Pct55.8%98
3PMs / Game7.565
3PAs / Game20.754
3-Point Pct36.2%71
FTMs / Game15.463
FTAs / Game20.036
Free Throw Pct76.9%97

Scoring Breakdown

% Pts from 2s49.5%44
% Pts from 3s30.0%58
% Pts from FTs20.5%49
Paint Pts / Game4.33
% Pts in Paint5.7%3
Fast Break Pts / Game0.96
% Pts on Fast Break1.3%6
Points off TOVs / Game3.13
% Pts off TOVs4.1%4
1st Half Pts / Game35.473
2nd Half Pts / Game39.470

Adv Offense

True Shooting %59.7%98
Points / Shot1.3997
3-Point Att Rate38.3%72
Assist Pct52.0%50
Assists / 100 Poss20.351
Ast/Tov Ratio1.07x57
PF Drawn / Game18.225

Opponent Shooting

Opp Effective FG%46.5%91
Opp True Shooting %50.1%94
Opp Field Goal Pct40.8%89
Opp 2-Point Pct45.5%85
Opp 3-Point Pct32.1%87
Opp 3PA Rate35.1%55
Opp FT Att Rate27.0%96
Opp Points / Shot1.1297

Defense Allowed

Points Allowed / Game66.886
Paint Pts Allowed4.197
Fast Break Pts Allowed0.596
Pts off TOVs Allowed3.394
Opp Assist Pct47.2%85
TOVs Forced / Game11.013

Adv Defense

Def Rebound Pct70.1%48
Turnovers Forced Pct16.5%11
Steal Pct8.6%34
Block Pct8.0%93
Hakeem Pct16.6%80
PF Efficiency0.93x78
Steals / PF0.34x71
Blocks / PF0.32x99

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams

#8TS%59.1%
#14eFG%55.2%
#20Adj ORtg115.7
#26SOS9.3
#29Pts Diff+294
#33Opp eFG%46.5%
#36Adj DRtg96.2
#44Opp 3P%32.1%

Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams

#8TS%59.1%
#14eFG%55.2%
#20Adj ORtg115.7
#26SOS9.3
#29Pts Diff+294
#33Opp eFG%46.5%
#36Adj DRtg96.2
#44Opp 3P%32.1%

Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams

#276Opp TOV%16.5%
#233TOV%19.0%
#189OREB%29.1%
#180Opp OREB%29.9%
#173AST%52.0%
#164FTAR37.0%
#1023P%36.2%
#953PM Diff+28

Most Similar Seasons

to 2015-16

Find Similar

1Marquette 2018-1924-10Big EastMost alike in Opp TOV%, 3PA rate, TOV%91
2Utah 2015-1626-9Pac 12Most alike in eFG%, Adj O, 3PA rate90
3Texas Tech 2023-2423-11Big 12Most alike in Tempo, Adj O, FT rate88
4Clemson 2017-1824-9ACCMost alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, Opp eFG%87
5Ohio St. 2025-2621-13Big 10Most alike in OREB%, eFG%, Adj O87
6Gonzaga 2013-1428-7WCCMost alike in OREB%, FT rate, eFG%84
7Dayton 2019-2029-2A10Most alike in Adj D, FT rate, Opp eFG%84
8Michigan St. 2016-1720-15Big 10Most alike in Tempo, Adj D, Opp eFG%84
9Ohio St. 2021-2220-12Big 10Most alike in Adj O, Opp OREB%, 3PA rate83
10Clemson 2023-2424-12ACCMost alike in 3PA rate, Tempo, Adj O83

Schedule

Loading the schedule

RCRobertCarterJr MTMeloTrimbleSo

JakeLaymanSr DSDiamondStoneFr

RasheedSulaimonSr JNJaredNickensSo DDDamonteDoddJr

VRVarunRamSr

TATrevorAnzmannSr

MCMichalCekovskySo

KentAuslanderFr

ATAndrewTerrellFr

JBJaylenBrantleySo

IBIvanBenderFr


R. CarterRobert Carter	Jr	6'9"	+1.795	–	–	62.4%91	24.1%85	12.4	6.9	1.9	33.3%	74.0%
M. TrimbleMelo Trimble	So	6'3"	+1.694	–	–	56.7%73	26.1%92	15.1	3.6	4.9	31.1%	86.7%
J. LaymanJake Layman	Sr	6'9"	+1.593	–	–	64.7%94	17.2%43	11.7	5.3	1.1	39.9%	84.6%
D. StoneDiamond Stone	Fr	6'11"	+1.492	–	–	61.5%89	26.4%93	12.4	5.5	0.4	0.0%	75.0%
R. SulaimonRasheed Sulaimon	Sr	6'4"	+1.492	–	–	59.2%83	18.0%49	11.1	3.5	3.5	42.9%	74.2%
J. NickensJared Nickens	So	6'7"	+0.573	–	–	53.5%57	13.5%19	5.4	1.9	0.4	34.7%	84.6%
D. DoddDamonte Dodd	Jr	6'11"	+0.157	–	–	65.5%95	11.8%11	2.9	2.7	0.3	0.0%	65.6%
V. RamVarun Ram	Sr	5'9"	–	–	–	33.2%9	14.0%21	0.5	0.3	0.3	25.0%	42.9%
T. AnzmannTrevor Anzmann	Sr	5'11"	–	–	–	50.0%39	11.0%9	0.3	0.0	0.2	33.3%	0.0%
M. CekovskyMichal Cekovsky	So	7'1"	–	–	–	53.1%55	15.6%31	1.9	1.9	0.1	0.0%	48.1%
K. AuslanderKent Auslander	Fr	6'6"	–	–	–	46.9%28	12.5%14	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.0%	60.0%
A. TerrellAndrew Terrell	Fr	5'10"	–	–	–	75.0%98	8.5%4	0.4	0.1	0.1	50.0%	0.0%
J. BrantleyJaylen Brantley	So	5'11"	–	–	–	58.9%82	13.9%21	2.1	1.0	0.5	41.7%	64.3%
I. BenderIvan Bender	Fr	6'9"	–	–	–	72.2%97	23.1%81	1.8	1.8	0.2	0.0%	57.1%

						Ratings (ADJUSTED)				Four Factors				Shooting
			Conf	Coach
25-26	12-21	4-16	B10	Buzz Williams	#157	0.855	110.457	109.651	12.094	+6864	-1436	33.8%76	+808	48.1%9	31.6%15	72.2%45
24-254	27-9	14-6	B10	Kevin Willard	#8	26.698	119.595	92.999	10.087	+8366	+5682	30.7%53	-14796	53.6%79	37.3%92	75.0%79
23-24	16-17	7-13	B10	Kevin Willard	#72	10.080	107.354	97.394	7.782	+3254	+2162	31.7%72	-2964	46.7%8	28.9%3	72.0%50
22-238	22-13	11-9	B10	Kevin Willard	#23	16.294	113.190	96.892	8.692	+5156	+3673	30.0%59	-4472	50.8%46	32.8%29	73.2%67
21-22	15-17	7-13	B10	Danny Manning	#88	8.476	110.885	102.461	10.096	+546	-4318	27.3%38	+1736	49.4%33	32.6%30	75.9%90
19-20	24-7	14-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#15	18.296	111.693	93.494	10.197	+12983	+1157	31.5%79	-1257	48.6%30	31.1%18	74.7%82
18-196	23-11	13-7	B10	Mark Turgeon	#25	16.893	113.292	96.491	10.995	+28698	-543	34.1%91	+1203	51.4%57	34.9%57	74.3%85
17-18	19-13	8-10	B10	Mark Turgeon	#31	14.690	113.484	98.890	8.087	+15588	-1541	31.6%74	+876	54.6%87	37.1%78	75.5%88
16-176	24-9	12-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#50	12.686	111.887	99.281	7.683	+1247	+6086	31.1%66	+943	52.3%71	35.9%62	69.9%47
15-165	26-9	12-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#21	19.194	115.894	96.790	8.589	+9474	+2767	29.3%44	+5717	55.4%96	36.1%67	76.8%98
14-154	28-7	14-4	B10	Mark Turgeon	#37	14.491	109.385	94.989	8.991	+5364	+1661	28.9%24	+4025	51.2%75	37.6%84	75.6%96
13-14	17-15	9-9	ACC	Mark Turgeon	#52	11.986	108.869	96.991	9.294	+10681	+3272	33.5%68	-250	49.1%41	34.2%48	67.9%30

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I

True Shooting %

59.1%#8

Effective FG %

55.2%#13

3-Point %

36.2%#101

3PAR

38.3%#98

FTAR

37.0%#164

Assist %

52.0%#173

Shot Profile

vs D-I

Rim rateshare of shots at the rim

30.5%#294

Rim FG %–

Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot

28.6%#168

Mid-range FG %–

Corner 3 share–

Corner 3 FG %–

Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

20 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense

Pts/Shot1.0892D-I 0.99

Early 0–10s0.777746.8% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.388127.7% of shots

Late 21s+1.338325.5% of shots

Defense

Pts/Shot0.9387Allowed, D-I 1.00

Early 0–10s0.696552.4% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.257126.3% of shots

Late 21s+1.128621.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.