Maryland23-9

Big 10Coach: Mark Turgeon

23-9NET#50

Schedule

R1L

Team Stats

32 games

Net Rating6.878
Offensive Rating111.361
Defensive Rating104.567
Pace65.838
Effective FG%52.4%77
Off Rebound Pct30.4%63
Turnover Pct19.6%47
FT Attempt Rate38.5%77

Team Stats

32 games

ViewSplit

Core Stats

Net Rating6.878
Offensive Rating111.361
Defensive Rating104.567
Pace65.838
Effective FG%52.4%77
Off Rebound Pct30.4%63
Turnover Pct19.6%47
FT Attempt Rate38.5%77

Results & Margin

Win Pct71.9%88
Point Margin / Game4.578
Points / Game73.355
Points Allowed / Game68.878
1st Half Margin2.472
2nd Half Margin2.177
Avg Largest Lead12.270
Avg Largest Deficit7.682

Box Score

Points / Game73.355
Rebounds / Game35.043
Assists / Game14.269
ORebs / Game10.349
DRebs / Game24.847
Steals / Game5.327
Blocks / Game4.687
Turnovers / Game12.955
PFs / Game18.659

Shooting

FGMs / Game25.042
FGAs / Game55.624
Field Goal Pct45.0%65
2PMs / Game16.724
2PAs / Game32.813
2-Point Pct51.0%72
3PMs / Game8.376
3PAs / Game22.872
3-Point Pct36.3%69
FTMs / Game15.064
FTAs / Game21.463
Free Throw Pct70.2%51

Scoring Breakdown

% Pts from 2s45.6%17
% Pts from 3s33.9%76
% Pts from FTs20.5%61
Paint Pts / Game11.312
% Pts in Paint15.4%12
Fast Break Pts / Game1.59
% Pts on Fast Break2.0%7
Points off TOVs / Game6.111
% Pts off TOVs8.3%10
1st Half Pts / Game34.660
2nd Half Pts / Game38.255

Adv Offense

True Shooting %56.4%77
Points / Shot1.3280
3-Point Att Rate41.1%82
Assist Pct56.8%82
Assists / 100 Poss21.568
Ast/Tov Ratio1.10x67
PF Drawn / Game19.258

Opponent Shooting

Opp Effective FG%47.5%87
Opp True Shooting %51.5%87
Opp Field Goal Pct41.8%84
Opp 2-Point Pct45.6%88
Opp 3-Point Pct34.2%66
Opp 3PA Rate32.9%85
Opp FT Att Rate32.6%68
Opp Points / Shot1.1885

Defense Allowed

Points Allowed / Game68.878
Paint Pts Allowed11.386
Fast Break Pts Allowed1.789
Pts off TOVs Allowed5.789
Opp Assist Pct46.7%88
TOVs Forced / Game12.332

Adv Defense

Def Rebound Pct67.7%15
Turnovers Forced Pct18.7%37
Steal Pct8.0%26
Block Pct7.0%87
Hakeem Pct15.0%61
PF Efficiency0.97x63
Steals / PF0.28x26
Blocks / PF0.25x88

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 350 D-I teams

#44Adj ORtg111.6
#47Opp eFG%47.5%
#513PM Diff+55
#53SOS8.4
#63AST%56.8%
#66Adj DRtg98.7
#79TS%55.8%
#79Pts Diff+144

Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams

#44Adj ORtg111.6
#47Opp eFG%47.5%
#513PM Diff+55
#53SOS8.4
#63AST%56.8%
#66Adj DRtg98.7
#79TS%55.8%
#79Pts Diff+144

Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams

#295Opp OREB%32.3%
#213TOV%19.1%
#203Opp TOV%18.1%
#189REB Diff-11
#130OREB%30.4%
#118Opp 3P%34.2%
#1053P%36.3%
#81FTAR38.5%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2016-17

Find Similar

1Texas Tech 2023-2423-11Big 12Most alike in OREB%, eFG%, 3PA rate92
2Vanderbilt 2014-1520-14SECMost alike in OREB%, Opp TOV%, Opp eFG%90
3SMU 2021-2224-9AmericanMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj D, eFG%89
4Minnesota 2013-1424-13Big 10Most alike in Adj O, 3PA rate, Tempo88
5Minnesota 2023-2419-15Big 10Most alike in TOV%, Tempo, OREB%87
6Pittsburgh 2022-2324-12ACCMost alike in OREB%, Adj O, eFG%86
7Alabama 2014-1518-15SECMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, Opp TOV%86
8Middle Tennessee 2021-2224-11C-USAMost alike in Opp eFG%, 3PA rate, TOV%85
9Seton Hall 2019-2021-9Big EastMost alike in eFG%, OREB%, Opp OREB%85
10Texas 2020-2119-8Big 12Most alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, FT rate85

Schedule

Loading the schedule

KevinHuerterFr ACAnthonyCowanFr MTMeloTrimbleJr JJJustinJacksonFr DDDamonteDoddSr

JBJaylenBrantleyJr

LGL.G.GillSr JNJaredNickensJr

DionWileySo MCMichalCekovskyJr

ATAndrewTerrellSo

IBIvanBenderSo

TVTravisValmonFr


K. HuerterKevin Huerter	Fr	6'7"	+1.693	–	–	55.9%60	16.4%38	9.3	4.9	2.7	37.9%	71.4%
A. CowanAnthony Cowan	Fr	6'0"	+1.388	–	–	57.3%66	21.1%71	10.3	3.9	3.7	34.7%	76.6%
M. TrimbleMelo Trimble	Jr	6'3"	+1.186	–	–	55.5%57	28.4%96	16.8	3.6	3.7	31.3%	79.1%
J. JacksonJustin Jackson	Fr	6'7"	+1.082	–	–	55.8%59	19.6%61	10.5	6.0	0.9	44.1%	70.2%
D. DoddDamonte Dodd	Sr	6'11"	+0.876	–	–	60.2%79	18.5%53	6.2	4.4	0.4	0.0%	50.7%
J. BrantleyJaylen Brantley	Jr	5'11"	+0.774	–	–	53.1%45	15.2%30	4.9	1.9	1.0	38.0%	62.1%
L.G. Gill	Sr	6'8"	–	–	–	56.8%64	14.2%23	3.5	2.1	0.3	30.0%	63.0%
J. NickensJared Nickens	Jr	6'7"	–	–	–	52.4%42	15.2%30	3.1	0.9	0.2	34.2%	80.0%
D. WileyDion Wiley	So	6'4"	–	–	–	49.4%29	19.1%58	3.2	1.5	0.6	38.5%	75.0%
M. CekovskyMichal Cekovsky	Jr	7'1"	–	–	–	65.6%91	24.8%88	7.6	2.8	0.5	0.0%	51.4%
A. TerrellAndrew Terrell	So	5'10"	–	–	–	0.0%1	10.7%9	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.0%	0.0%
I. BenderIvan Bender	So	6'9"	–	–	–	68.3%93	16.6%40	4.8	3.2	0.9	0.0%	66.7%
T. ValmonTravis Valmon	Fr	6'1"	–	–	–	–	23.4%83	0.4	0.4	0.0	0.0%	0.0%

						Ratings (ADJUSTED)				Four Factors				Shooting
			Conf	Coach
25-26	12-21	4-16	B10	Buzz Williams	#157	0.855	110.457	109.651	12.094	+6864	-1436	33.8%76	+808	48.1%9	31.6%15	72.2%45
24-254	27-9	14-6	B10	Kevin Willard	#8	26.698	119.595	92.999	10.087	+8366	+5682	30.7%53	-14796	53.6%79	37.3%92	75.0%79
23-24	16-17	7-13	B10	Kevin Willard	#72	10.080	107.354	97.394	7.782	+3254	+2162	31.7%72	-2964	46.7%8	28.9%3	72.0%50
22-238	22-13	11-9	B10	Kevin Willard	#23	16.294	113.190	96.892	8.692	+5156	+3673	30.0%59	-4472	50.8%46	32.8%29	73.2%67
21-22	15-17	7-13	B10	Danny Manning	#88	8.476	110.885	102.461	10.096	+546	-4318	27.3%38	+1736	49.4%33	32.6%30	75.9%90
19-20	24-7	14-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#15	18.296	111.693	93.494	10.197	+12983	+1157	31.5%79	-1257	48.6%30	31.1%18	74.7%82
18-196	23-11	13-7	B10	Mark Turgeon	#25	16.893	113.292	96.491	10.995	+28698	-543	34.1%91	+1203	51.4%57	34.9%57	74.3%85
17-18	19-13	8-10	B10	Mark Turgeon	#31	14.690	113.484	98.890	8.087	+15588	-1541	31.6%74	+876	54.6%87	37.1%78	75.5%88
16-176	24-9	12-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#50	12.686	111.887	99.281	7.683	+1247	+6086	31.1%66	+943	52.3%71	35.9%62	69.9%47
15-165	26-9	12-6	B10	Mark Turgeon	#21	19.194	115.894	96.790	8.589	+9474	+2767	29.3%44	+5717	55.4%96	36.1%67	76.8%98
14-154	28-7	14-4	B10	Mark Turgeon	#37	14.491	109.385	94.989	8.991	+5364	+1661	28.9%24	+4025	51.2%75	37.6%84	75.6%96
13-14	17-15	9-9	ACC	Mark Turgeon	#52	11.986	108.869	96.991	9.294	+10681	+3272	33.5%68	-250	49.1%41	34.2%48	67.9%30

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I

True Shooting %

55.8%#79

Effective FG %

52.4%#79

3-Point %

36.3%#105

3PAR

41.1%#64

FTAR

38.5%#81

Assist %

56.8%#63

Shot Profile

vs D-I

Rim rateshare of shots at the rim

31.6%#263

Rim FG %–

Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot

25.9%#127

Mid-range FG %–

Corner 3 share–

Corner 3 FG %–

Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

21 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense

Pts/Shot1.0889D-I 1.00

Early 0–10s0.767148.3% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.479425.2% of shots

Late 21s+1.297326.6% of shots

Defense

Pts/Shot0.9486Allowed, D-I 1.01

Early 0–10s0.638647.9% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.257627.8% of shots

Late 21s+1.196824.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.