Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Princeton logoPrinceton logoPrinceton logoPrinceton logo

Princeton22-7

IvyCoach: Mitch Henderson

22-7NET#60
Schedule
LBYU logoBYU logoLLehigh logoLehigh logoWLafayette logoLafayette logoWLVCU logoVCU logoLCalifornia logoCalifornia logoWHawaii logoHawaii logoWLiberty logoLiberty logoLSaint Joseph's logoLMonmouth logoMonmouth logoWBucknell logoBucknell logoWHampton logoHampton logoWCal Poly logoCal Poly logoWPenn logoPenn logoWBrown logoBrown logoWYale logoYale logoWDartmouth logoDartmouth logoWHarvard logoHarvard logoWPenn logoPenn logoWCornell logoCornell logoWColumbia logoColumbia logoWYale logoYale logoWBrown logoBrown logoWColumbia logoColumbia logoWCornell logoCornell logoWHarvard logoHarvard logoWDartmouth logoDartmouth logoWPenn logoPenn logoWYale logoYale logoR1LNotre Dame logoNotre Dame logo

Team Stats

29 games
  • Net Rating14.093
  • Offensive Rating117.081
  • Defensive Rating103.075
  • Pace60.213
  • Effective FG%53.2%84
  • Off Rebound Pct24.1%9
  • Turnover Pct16.4%93
  • FT Attempt Rate24.4%0

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating14.093
  • Offensive Rating117.081
  • Defensive Rating103.075
  • Pace60.213
  • Effective FG%53.2%84
  • Off Rebound Pct24.1%9
  • Turnover Pct16.4%93
  • FT Attempt Rate24.4%0

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct75.9%94
  • Point Margin / Game8.490
  • Points / Game70.436
  • Points Allowed / Game62.097
  • 1st Half Margin6.595
  • 2nd Half Margin1.976
  • Avg Largest Lead16.091
  • Avg Largest Deficit5.297

Box Score

  • Points / Game70.436
  • Rebounds / Game32.514
  • Assists / Game13.762
  • ORebs / Game8.18
  • DRebs / Game24.437
  • Steals / Game6.667
  • Blocks / Game3.249
  • Turnovers / Game9.999
  • PFs / Game16.292

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game25.246
  • FGAs / Game56.636
  • Field Goal Pct44.5%59
  • 2PMs / Game15.36
  • 2PAs / Game30.44
  • 2-Point Pct50.5%66
  • 3PMs / Game9.896
  • 3PAs / Game26.195
  • 3-Point Pct37.6%83
  • FTMs / Game10.22
  • FTAs / Game13.80
  • Free Throw Pct74.0%82

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s43.6%7
  • % Pts from 3s41.9%99
  • % Pts from FTs14.5%2
  • Paint Pts / Game19.344
  • % Pts in Paint27.4%48
  • Fast Break Pts / Game2.117
  • % Pts on Fast Break2.9%17
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.756
  • % Pts off TOVs16.7%58
  • 1st Half Pts / Game35.268
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game34.712

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %56.2%73
  • Points / Shot1.2440
  • 3-Point Att Rate46.2%97
  • Assist Pct54.4%64
  • Assists / 100 Poss22.881
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.39x96
  • PF Drawn / Game15.30

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%48.7%74
  • Opp True Shooting %52.5%77
  • Opp Field Goal Pct42.4%76
  • Opp 2-Point Pct46.9%78
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.5%60
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.7%45
  • Opp FT Att Rate32.0%74
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2079

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game62.097
  • Paint Pts Allowed17.665
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed2.085
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed7.881
  • Opp Assist Pct48.4%80
  • TOVs Forced / Game13.153

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct75.2%94
  • Turnovers Forced Pct21.8%80
  • Steal Pct11.0%84
  • Block Pct5.3%57
  • Hakeem Pct16.3%77
  • PF Efficiency1.05x32
  • Steals / PF0.41x92
  • Blocks / PF0.20x68

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 350 D-I teams
  • #11TOV%15.2%
  • #143PM Diff+95
  • #23Opp OREB%24.8%
  • #44Pts Diff+244
  • #50Adj DRtg97.2
  • #57eFG%53.2%
  • #593P%37.6%
  • #67Opp TOV%20.3%
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
  • #11TOV%15.2%
  • #143PM Diff+95
  • #23Opp OREB%24.8%
  • #44Pts Diff+244
  • #50Adj DRtg97.2
  • #57eFG%53.2%
  • #593P%37.6%
  • #67Opp TOV%20.3%
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
  • #349FTAR24.4%
  • #319OREB%24.1%
  • #248FB Pts %4.6%
  • #215REB Diff-29
  • #204Paint Pts %37.3%
  • #171SOS-0.9
  • #140Opp 3P%34.5%
  • #124AST%54.4%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2016-17
Find Similar
  1. 1Michigan logoMichigan logoMichigan 2014-1515-16Big 1081
  2. 2Villanova logoVillanova logoVillanova 2023-2418-16Big East80
  3. 3Liberty logoLiberty logoLiberty 2022-2324-9ASUN79
  4. 4Virginia Tech logoVirginia Tech logoVirginia Tech 2019-2016-16ACC77
  5. 5Michigan logoMichigan logoMichigan 2015-1622-13Big 1076
  6. 6Liberty logoLiberty logoLiberty 2018-1926-7ASUN75
  7. 7Santa Clara logoSanta Clara logoSanta Clara 2016-1716-16WCC75
  8. 8St. Thomas logoSt. Thomas logoSt. Thomas 2023-2417-13Summit74
  9. 9Wisconsin logoWisconsin logoWisconsin 2022-2320-15Big 1073
  10. 10Liberty logoLiberty logoLiberty 2023-2415-14C-USA73
Schedule
Loading the schedule
SCStevenCookSrSWSpencerWeiszSrDCDevinCannadySoHBHansBraseSrABAmirBellJrMyles Stephens headshotMylesStephensSoHCHenryCarusoSr
KRKhyanRaynerSr
PMPeteMillerSr
AYAaronYoungJr
JFJacksonForbesJr
ABAlecBrennanJr
MLMikeLeBlancJr
EBEliasBerbariSo
NBNoahBramlageSo
ALAlexanderLeeSr
VRVittorioReynoso-AvilaFr
Richmond Aririguzoh headshotRichmondAririguzohFr
Jose Morales headshotJoseMoralesFr
WGWillGladsonFr
S. CookSr6'5"+1.184––59.3%7522.8%8013.65.11.742.0%67.0%
S. WeiszSr6'4"+0.979––50.7%3420.3%6610.65.44.233.7%69.6%
D. CannadySo6'1"+0.671––59.1%7520.6%6813.43.61.840.3%93.8%
H. BraseSr6'9"+0.359––54.9%5422.6%796.42.81.450.0%100.0%
A. BellJr6'4"+0.153––53.7%4816.9%426.62.42.038.1%70.3%
M. StephensSo6'5"+0.049––58.3%7223.4%8312.54.61.140.5%65.3%
H. CarusoSr6'4"-0.337––51.9%3923.4%839.54.40.833.3%85.7%
K. RaynerSr5'11"–––92.3%987.6%40.50.30.250.0%0.0%
P. MillerSr6'11"–––59.2%7513.5%203.03.51.2100.0%72.7%
A. YoungJr6'0"–––57.0%6515.1%291.50.50.140.0%83.3%
J. ForbesJr6'6"–––87.5%9818.6%540.80.40.30.0%0.0%
A. BrennanJr6'11"–––68.5%9314.9%282.31.50.342.9%66.7%
M. LeBlancJr6'6"–––74.2%9511.9%120.80.30.216.7%50.0%
E. BerbariSo6'2"–––0.0%123.0%810.00.30.00.0%0.0%
N. BramlageSo6'9"–––105.0%9914.6%260.70.50.30.0%0.0%
A. LeeSr6'5"–––56.3%6119.0%571.51.30.00.0%0.0%
V. Reynoso-AvilaFr6'5"––––1.9%21.10.90.60.0%0.0%
R. AririguzohFr6'9"–––54.5%5217.9%481.51.00.30.0%71.4%
J. MoralesFr5'9"–––68.5%9327.0%931.10.40.50.0%66.7%
W. GladsonFr6'10"–––42.8%1416.5%392.31.10.523.1%75.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Princeton logoPrinceton logo25-269-20#248-5.734106.332112.136-0.762+142+287028.1%21+491550.1%2734.2%5475.2%80
Princeton logoPrinceton logo24-2519-11#179-1.351106.444107.751-1.758+140+769327.1%24-517852.0%6335.5%7671.0%37
Princeton logoPrinceton logo23-2424-5#6211.683116.792105.261-1.456+3858+999825.7%20-849154.8%9235.6%7580.6%100
Princeton logoPrinceton logo22-231523-9#866.773109.875103.1660.165+19396+688929.1%51+491752.6%7634.2%5171.2%44
Princeton logoPrinceton logo21-2223-7#1006.873114.894108.026-4.233+5864+13910025.8%25-417457.5%9938.7%9963.9%2
Princeton logoPrinceton logo19-2014-13#1650.654105.868105.231-1.057+3259+769625.5%24+222854.1%9335.7%8473.4%74
Princeton logoPrinceton logo18-1916-12#190-1.84699.118100.974-0.854+1450+156026.4%29+64547.3%1030.5%573.9%81
Princeton logoPrinceton logo17-1813-16#182-1.747106.354108.039-1.650-4127+699222.6%6-24954.0%8337.4%8270.7%42
Princeton logoPrinceton logo16-171223-7#6011.583109.27797.686-1.550-143+1039824.5%10-969553.7%8537.8%8373.8%83
Princeton logoPrinceton logo15-1621-7#5512.285111.78699.678-0.955+8477+1139928.8%39-447754.6%9438.3%9171.2%64
Princeton logoPrinceton logo14-1515-14#1630.956105.970105.039-2.242-4329+829621.2%1+34554.9%9537.7%8671.1%71
Princeton logoPrinceton logo13-1420-9#966.473107.058100.679-2.739+446+1289925.7%6-357453.0%8735.9%6972.1%73

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
55.8%#79
Effective FG %
53.2%#57
3-Point %
37.6%#58
3PAR
46.2%#12
FTAR
24.4%#349
Assist %
54.4%#124

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
35.5%#158
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
18.2%#14
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

23 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 40.8% of shots at 0.65 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7140.8%0.65Middle (11–20s): 33.2% of shots at 1.30 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3033.2%1.30Late (21s+): 26.1% of shots at 1.28 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2226.1%1.28SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0364D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.652340.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.304633.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.286826.1% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.3% of shots at 0.63 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7244.3%0.63Middle (11–20s): 29.3% of shots at 1.32 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3229.3%1.32Late (21s+): 26.4% of shots at 1.25 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2326.4%1.25SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0058Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.638644.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.324529.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.254326.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.