St. Thomas21-10

SummitCoach: Johnny Tauer

21-10NET#98

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nick Janowski	1,648	378	81.4%	−5.230	−7.118	−1.960	−4.612	−4.316	−1.574	+12.396	+1.236	+7.298	−2.020	−7.484
Nolan Minessale	1,607	418	79.3%	+21.398	+7.386	−14.096	+1.566	+1.668	−2.484	+5.680	−5.292	−2.626	+5.098	−4.976
Carter Bjerke	1,267	758	62.6%	+20.898	+11.396	−9.590	+3.584	+5.592	−1.776	−6.318	−2.776	+6.896	+1.780	+0.744
Ben Oosterbaan	1,234	791	60.9%	+3.164	+0.956	−2.162	+0.556	+2.778	−0.150	−6.220	−2.070	+5.292	−1.722	+2.734
Isaiah Johnson-Arigu	1,088	937	53.7%	−4.832	−2.836	+2.036	−0.248	−3.222	+1.130	+7.486	+1.730	−4.116	+2.588	+2.932
Austin Herro	1,014	1,011	50.1%	+11.388	−1.642	−12.996	−0.148	+4.386	+3.28	+12.096	−3.582	+6.998	+2.486	+4.524
Ryan Dufault	864	1,162	42.6%	−10.018	+5.882	+15.80	+0.556	+5.592	−1.066	+0.756	+7.12	−1.634	−1.328	+10.18
Jermaine Coleman	692	1,333	34.2%	−19.06	−10.010	+9.08	−3.718	−4.912	+0.836	−9.88	+3.516	−3.718	−2.118	−4.272
Hayden Tibbits	380	1,646	18.7%	+2.260	+9.692	+7.412	+5.594	−2.528	−3.190	−4.030	−1.768	−6.08	−3.96	+1.540
Ryan Lafferty	179	1,847	8.8%	−15.38	−21.42	−6.282	−7.64	−14.82	+0.836	−14.04	−2.474	−6.08	+2.588	−2.866

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nick Janowski	1,648	378	81.4%	12.868	115.662	102.862	58.1%76	22.2%20	14.1%64	36.6%58	50.4%52	75.3%72	16.7%54	29.0%58
Nolan Minessale	1,607	418	79.3%	18.276	118.470	100.268	59.3%80	23.3%24	13.9%64	35.3%56	49.1%58	73.4%66	18.2%64	29.4%56
Carter Bjerke	1,267	758	62.6%	21.780	121.174	99.470	60.3%82	25.0%32	13.7%66	31.9%46	49.1%58	76.5%76	17.8%62	30.7%54
Ben Oosterbaan	1,234	791	60.9%	14.970	117.266	102.362	59.2%80	24.1%28	14.3%62	31.8%46	49.4%58	75.9%74	16.4%52	31.5%50
Isaiah Johnson-Arigu	1,088	937	53.7%	11.566	115.662	104.158	58.9%78	21.5%20	14.9%58	37.7%60	51.0%50	72.0%58	18.3%66	31.8%50
Austin Herro	1,014	1,011	50.1%	19.478	116.164	96.774	59.0%78	25.2%32	16.0%48	40.3%66	48.4%62	77.4%80	18.3%66	32.8%46
Ryan Dufault	864	1,162	42.6%	8.260	120.272	112.038	59.3%80	26.1%34	13.8%66	34.6%54	54.2%36	73.0%64	16.4%52	36.2%38
Jermaine Coleman	692	1,333	34.2%	1.348	110.350	109.046	56.6%70	19.8%14	14.9%58	27.8%36	52.4%44	71.5%58	15.8%48	27.8%62
Hayden Tibbits	380	1,646	18.7%	15.572	124.682	109.146	63.5%90	20.9%18	11.9%78	31.0%44	48.8%60	69.1%46	14.0%34	31.7%50
Ryan Lafferty	179	1,847	8.8%	-0.246	97.322	97.574	52.1%50	9.5%4	15.1%56	21.4%18	48.1%64	68.5%42	19.4%72	27.9%60

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nick Janowski	1,648	378	81.4%	17.976	122.678	104.756	62.7%88	26.5%36	15.6%50	24.2%26	49.3%58	68.2%42	18.7%68	36.4%38
Nolan Minessale	1,607	418	79.3%	-3.140	111.152	114.234	57.9%74	21.7%20	16.2%46	29.7%40	54.3%34	76.0%74	13.2%28	34.4%42
Carter Bjerke	1,267	758	62.6%	0.948	109.848	108.946	56.8%70	19.6%14	15.4%52	38.2%62	51.8%46	69.8%48	16.1%50	30.0%54
Ben Oosterbaan	1,234	791	60.9%	11.966	116.364	104.556	58.7%78	21.3%18	14.4%60	38.0%62	51.4%48	70.8%52	18.2%64	28.8%58
Isaiah Johnson-Arigu	1,088	937	53.7%	16.372	118.470	102.064	59.1%78	24.7%28	13.8%66	30.3%42	49.3%58	76.1%74	15.8%48	28.9%58
Austin Herro	1,014	1,011	50.1%	8.160	117.768	109.644	59.1%78	20.9%18	12.8%72	28.4%38	51.9%46	70.5%52	15.9%48	28.3%60
Ryan Dufault	864	1,162	42.6%	18.276	114.460	96.276	58.8%78	20.6%18	14.8%58	33.9%52	47.2%68	74.6%68	17.7%62	26.1%66
Jermaine Coleman	692	1,333	34.2%	20.378	120.374	100.068	60.3%82	24.7%28	14.1%62	37.5%60	48.9%60	75.2%72	17.9%62	32.0%50
Hayden Tibbits	380	1,646	18.7%	13.368	115.162	101.764	58.0%76	23.5%24	14.9%56	34.9%54	50.6%52	75.2%72	17.9%62	30.1%54
Ryan Lafferty	179	1,847	8.8%	15.170	118.870	103.760	59.7%80	24.4%28	14.3%62	35.4%56	50.4%52	74.5%68	16.9%56	30.7%54

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.