Schedule
W
WL
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
WW
L
W
W
W
W
WLL
WWWWL
W
W
L
LWLL
WLWWWWWWWWLWWLWWWWWLLWWWWLWWLLWLLTeam Stats
32 games- Net Rating8.584
- Offensive Rating133.693
- Defensive Rating125.016
- Pace53.17
- Effective FG%50.0%42
- Off Rebound Pct33.3%90
- Turnover Pct25.3%10
- FT Attempt Rate34.4%61
Team Stats
32 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating8.584
- Offensive Rating133.693
- Defensive Rating125.016
- Pace53.17
- Effective FG%50.0%42
- Off Rebound Pct33.3%90
- Turnover Pct25.3%10
- FT Attempt Rate34.4%61
Results & Margin
- Win Pct68.8%85
- Point Margin / Game4.581
- Points / Game70.943
- Points Allowed / Game66.388
- 1st Half Margin1.871
- 2nd Half Margin2.780
- Avg Largest Lead10.452
- Avg Largest Deficit8.278
Box Score
- Points / Game70.943
- Rebounds / Game37.180
- Assists / Game13.971
- ORebs / Game11.887
- DRebs / Game25.357
- Steals / Game6.462
- Blocks / Game2.525
- Turnovers / Game13.437
- PFs / Game19.714
Shooting
- FGMs / Game25.250
- FGAs / Game57.447
- Field Goal Pct43.8%48
- 2PMs / Game18.162
- 2PAs / Game35.655
- 2-Point Pct50.8%58
- 3PMs / Game7.133
- 3PAs / Game21.843
- 3-Point Pct32.5%25
- FTMs / Game13.552
- FTAs / Game19.862
- Free Throw Pct68.2%24
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s51.0%66
- % Pts from 3s30.0%34
- % Pts from FTs19.0%53
- Paint Pts / Game20.645
- % Pts in Paint29.1%45
- Fast Break Pts / Game5.053
- % Pts on Fast Break7.1%54
- Points off TOVs / Game10.845
- % Pts off TOVs15.3%45
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.841
- 2nd Half Pts / Game37.549
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %53.6%39
- Points / Shot1.2341
- 3-Point Att Rate38.1%47
- Assist Pct55.4%79
- Assists / 100 Poss26.394
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.04x57
- PF Drawn / Game18.564
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%48.5%80
- Opp True Shooting %53.6%64
- Opp Field Goal Pct42.3%78
- Opp 2-Point Pct49.3%62
- Opp 3-Point Pct31.6%90
- Opp 3PA Rate39.6%38
- Opp FT Att Rate39.5%11
- Opp Points / Shot1.2647
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game66.388
- Paint Pts Allowed18.171
- Fast Break Pts Allowed5.245
- Pts off TOVs Allowed10.659
- Opp Assist Pct48.2%79
- TOVs Forced / Game14.280
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct75.4%92
- Turnovers Forced Pct26.7%94
- Steal Pct12.1%87
- Block Pct4.7%43
- Hakeem Pct16.7%77
- PF Efficiency1.06x27
- Steals / PF0.32x37
- Blocks / PF0.13x19
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 353 D-I teams- #27Opp OREB%24.6%
- #27REB Diff+165
- #37OREB%33.3%
- #37Opp 3P%31.6%
- #61Opp TOV%20.8%
- #68Adj DRtg98.6
- #73Opp eFG%48.5%
- #74Paint Pts %43.1%
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
- #27Opp OREB%24.6%
- #27REB Diff+165
- #37OREB%33.3%
- #37Opp 3P%31.6%
- #61Opp TOV%20.8%
- #68Adj DRtg98.6
- #73Opp eFG%48.5%
- #74Paint Pts %43.1%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
- #2663P%32.5%
- #252TOV%19.8%
- #237SOS-2.7
- #216TS%53.1%
- #206eFG%50.0%
- #206Adj ORtg103.1
- #1383PM Diff+16
- #137FTAR34.4%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1
Kent St. 2024-2522-12MACMost alike in OREB%, Opp eFG%, Adj D88 - 2
Middle TennesseeMTSU 2013-1422-9C-USAMost alike in TOV%, Adj D, Opp eFG%86 - 3Kent St. 2021-2221-11MACMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, FT rate86
- 4
Harvard 2022-2312-14IvyMost alike in 3PA rate, eFG%, Opp OREB%85 - 5
Alabama 2016-1719-14SECMost alike in Tempo, OREB%, Adj O85 - 6
Longwood 2022-2318-12Big SouthMost alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, eFG%85 - 7
Sam Houston St.Sam Houston 2022-2322-8WACMost alike in Tempo, Opp OREB%, 3PA rate83 - 8Sam Houston St.Sam Houston 2017-1817-15SouthlandMost alike in FT rate, OREB%, Opp TOV%83
- 9
Northern IllinoisNIU 2015-1617-13MACMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp TOV%, Adj O82 - 10
Bradley 2017-1819-13MVCMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, Adj D82
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JaylenSheadJr
AlexPeacockSr
NijalPearsonJr
EricTerryJr
Tre'LarenzNottinghamSrIGIsaiahGurleySr
ShelbyAdamsSoQSQuentinScottSo
MasonHarrellFr
AlonzoSuleFrCDChandlerDavisJr
ADAkiemDaschnerSo
| J. SheadJaylen Shead | Jr | 6'1" | +0.672 | – | – | 53.2%45 | 18.3%51 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 29.6% | 68.5% |
| A. PeacockAlex Peacock | Sr | 6'7" | +0.360 | – | – | 52.8%43 | 16.9%42 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 2.2 | 33.7% | 74.2% |
| N. PearsonNijal Pearson | Jr | 6'5" | +0.152 | – | – | 53.4%46 | 23.8%84 | 16.4 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 39.0% | 70.1% |
| E. TerryEric Terry | Jr | 6'8" | -0.143 | – | – | 71.1%94 | 18.4%52 | 8.5 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.0% | 57.1% |
| T. NottinghamTre'Larenz Nottingham | Sr | 6'2" | -0.526 | – | – | 51.1%35 | 24.0%85 | 14.2 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 30.4% | 76.4% |
| I. GurleyIsaiah Gurley | Sr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 44.2%15 | 13.1%17 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| S. AdamsShelby Adams | So | 6'3" | – | – | – | 75.2%95 | 12.4%14 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 45.5% | 35.7% |
| Q. ScottQuentin Scott | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 48.2%24 | 14.7%27 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 12.5% | 48.5% |
| M. HarrellMason Harrell | Fr | 5'9" | – | – | – | 51.3%35 | 19.3%59 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 27.5% | 78.8% |
| A. SuleAlonzo Sule | Fr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 65.5%89 | 20.9%70 | 6.4 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 67.2% |
| C. DavisChandler Davis | Jr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 53.3%46 | 20.6%68 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.0% | 46.7% |
| A. DaschnerAkiem Daschner | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 37.6%9 | 12.4%14 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 37.5% | 57.1% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 25-26 | 19-13 | #253 | -6.431 | 104.625 | 111.042 | -7.412 | +14987 | -795 | 34.4%81 | -1357 | 51.0%40 | 33.0%34 | 75.9%87 |
| 24-25 | 16-16 | #193 | -2.844 | 109.563 | 112.323 | -4.929 | +13586 | -5012 | 35.8%92 | +2230 | 51.5%54 | 36.5%87 | 75.6%85 |
| 23-24 | 17-18 | #207 | -2.247 | 101.623 | 103.869 | -1.159 | +6163 | -6113 | 31.9%75 | +1734 | 48.4%21 | 32.6%28 | 69.6%21 |
| 22-23 | 16-19 | #195 | -3.739 | 103.237 | 106.942 | -1.850 | +6461 | -6212 | 31.5%73 | -1657 | 48.2%16 | 30.7%6 | 72.9%65 |
| 21-22 | 21-8 | #131 | 1.758 | 106.163 | 104.448 | -4.629 | +7169 | -1433 | 31.6%80 | -7086 | 52.0%72 | 37.4%93 | 75.2%82 |
| 19-20 | 21-11 | #86 | 9.178 | 107.980 | 98.874 | -1.453 | +3759 | -3722 | 30.2%67 | -11295 | 50.3%54 | 32.5%37 | 75.6%90 |
| 18-19 | 24-10 | #129 | 4.967 | 103.943 | 99.181 | -3.729 | +20894 | +2665 | 34.0%91 | -4472 | 50.6%45 | 32.8%26 | 68.3%26 |
| 17-18 | 15-18 | #218 | -4.437 | 101.526 | 105.952 | -3.034 | +10379 | -1244 | 32.5%81 | 046 | 49.4%27 | 33.0%21 | 66.1%8 |
| 16-17 | 22-14 | #172 | 0.754 | 102.338 | 101.670 | -3.629 | +1447 | +451 | 29.0%43 | -6079 | 50.4%45 | 33.0%22 | 66.1%14 |
| 15-16 | 13-16 | #208 | -3.939 | 99.623 | 103.557 | -4.027 | +447 | -4518 | 31.0%61 | -6988 | 47.3%17 | 32.5%21 | 67.3%23 |
| 14-15 | 11-17 | #225 | -4.138 | 93.68 | 97.779 | -2.935 | -7620 | 049 | 29.2%28 | -8392 | 45.2%8 | 31.4%17 | 69.0%48 |
| 13-14 | 6-23 | #275 | -9.220 | 95.88 | 104.955 | -1.745 | +4660 | -618 | 31.2%46 | +4419 | 48.0%28 | 30.6%8 | 66.3%18 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
53.1%#214
Effective FG %
50.0%#205
3-Point %
32.5%#265
3PAR
38.1%#185
FTAR
34.4%#136
Assist %
55.4%#73
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.7%#192
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
26.9%#206
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
18 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9618D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.732547.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.297126.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.031525.7% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0251Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.872745.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.167632.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.117022.4% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.