Winthrop20-11

Big SouthCoach: Mark Prosser

20-11NET#168

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kasen Harrison	1,733	508	77.3%	+11.388	+13.898	+2.534	−1.138	+7.798	−5.598	+3.874	+4.310	+3.078	+1.170	+2.734
Kelton Talford	1,623	619	72.4%	+6.776	+10.994	+4.228	+5.494	+5.190	+0.738	+0.756	+4.212	+4.992	−1.724	−1.356
Nick Johnson	1,613	628	72.0%	+4.368	+4.876	+0.546	−0.348	+3.884	−0.556	+8.590	−0.352	−1.238	−0.838	−0.150
K.J. Doucet	1,462	780	65.2%	+5.572	+8.288	+2.734	+2.980	+4.186	−1.168	−3.730	+0.742	+3.582	−3.86	−9.992
Paul Jones III	1,023	1,218	45.7%	−5.730	−0.846	+4.924	−2.822	+1.768	−1.876	−1.344	−1.970	−1.536	−3.96	+1.740
Bryce Baker	1,015	1,227	45.3%	+3.162	−0.150	−3.166	+2.374	−3.820	+1.034	+3.472	−2.172	−0.546	+1.474	+2.038
Tommy Kamarad	733	1,509	32.7%	−2.242	−7.416	−5.276	−1.534	−3.124	+0.344	−13.84	−1.566	+0.658	+1.678	−2.262
Isaiah Wilson	577	1,664	25.7%	−7.824	−8.812	−1.154	+1.264	−7.84	+2.220	+2.668	−2.070	−1.536	−0.150	+4.624
Ryan Jolly	491	1,750	21.9%	+2.662	−0.350	−2.966	+1.870	−1.736	+1.230	+0.254	+2.028	−0.248	+2.890	−4.876
Logan Duncomb	309	1,933	13.8%	−5.830	−9.112	−3.368	−5.68	−2.628	−1.370	−5.522	−4.488	+3.180	−3.010	+1.342
Tai Hamilton	307	1,935	13.7%	−8.822	−11.68	−2.864	−3.816	−5.510	+1.132	+0.656	−2.272	−10.82	+5.3100	+1.540
Yoro Diallo	274	1,967	12.2%	−2.242	−9.112	−7.084	−4.314	−0.646	+4.92	+15.498	−0.656	−1.140	+5.3100	+7.912

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kasen Harrison	1,733	508	77.3%	6.458	115.966	109.644	53.1%58	35.7%68	16.7%48	48.4%86	52.6%40	67.3%42	19.4%66	37.5%28
Kelton Talford	1,623	619	72.4%	5.656	115.866	110.242	54.8%66	35.7%68	18.2%38	47.8%84	52.8%40	68.1%46	18.7%60	36.5%30
Nick Johnson	1,613	628	72.0%	5.056	114.162	109.144	53.2%58	35.1%68	17.9%40	50.0%88	51.5%46	66.2%38	18.9%62	36.8%30
K.J. Doucet	1,462	780	65.2%	5.756	115.666	109.942	54.3%64	35.6%68	17.6%42	46.4%84	51.8%44	67.8%44	17.8%56	33.4%38
Paul Jones III	1,023	1,218	45.7%	0.748	112.458	111.738	51.8%52	35.0%66	17.0%46	47.0%84	50.5%50	65.8%36	17.0%48	37.8%28
Bryce Baker	1,015	1,227	45.3%	5.556	112.858	107.350	54.6%64	32.0%54	18.5%36	49.6%86	50.4%50	66.3%38	19.9%70	37.9%28
Tommy Kamarad	733	1,509	32.7%	2.452	107.846	105.454	52.3%54	32.0%56	18.2%38	38.5%72	50.5%50	67.0%42	20.2%72	35.4%34
Isaiah Wilson	577	1,664	25.7%	-1.944	106.242	108.246	54.2%62	28.2%40	19.6%28	49.7%86	50.1%50	65.5%36	19.1%64	40.3%22
Ryan Jolly	491	1,750	21.9%	5.856	112.658	106.750	54.7%66	32.8%58	18.9%32	47.8%84	53.1%38	66.4%38	21.3%78	33.1%38
Logan Duncomb	309	1,933	13.8%	-1.146	105.040	106.152	48.5%36	31.9%54	16.8%48	43.0%78	47.8%62	69.2%52	16.5%46	38.0%28
Tai Hamilton	307	1,935	13.7%	-3.840	102.734	106.650	50.0%40	29.4%44	18.9%32	48.1%84	49.6%56	57.5%12	23.7%86	38.1%26
Yoro Diallo	274	1,967	12.2%	1.850	104.838	103.060	49.5%40	33.6%62	22.3%14	61.4%94	51.0%48	65.6%36	23.7%86	43.8%18

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kasen Harrison	1,733	508	77.3%	-4.938	102.132	107.050	54.2%62	28.0%38	22.2%16	44.6%82	48.3%60	64.4%32	18.3%60	34.8%34
Kelton Talford	1,623	619	72.4%	-1.146	104.940	106.052	49.4%40	30.6%48	17.5%44	47.1%84	48.6%60	63.2%28	20.3%72	37.8%28
Nick Johnson	1,613	628	72.0%	0.848	109.450	108.646	53.5%60	31.4%52	18.3%38	41.5%76	51.8%44	67.4%42	19.7%68	37.0%30
K.J. Doucet	1,462	780	65.2%	0.246	107.546	107.350	51.4%50	31.5%52	18.7%34	50.1%88	51.1%48	64.3%32	21.6%78	43.3%18
Paul Jones III	1,023	1,218	45.7%	6.458	113.260	106.750	54.6%64	33.3%58	18.8%34	48.3%86	52.4%40	67.3%42	20.9%76	36.1%32
Bryce Baker	1,015	1,227	45.3%	2.552	112.858	110.440	52.3%54	35.8%70	17.5%42	46.1%82	52.5%40	66.8%42	18.5%60	36.0%32
Tommy Kamarad	733	1,509	32.7%	4.554	115.264	110.740	53.8%62	35.1%68	17.9%40	52.3%90	52.0%44	66.4%38	18.6%60	37.6%28
Isaiah Wilson	577	1,664	25.7%	5.856	115.164	109.244	53.0%58	36.0%70	17.4%44	47.0%84	52.1%42	67.0%42	19.2%64	35.6%32
Ryan Jolly	491	1,750	21.9%	3.252	112.958	109.644	52.9%58	34.5%64	17.7%42	47.6%84	51.1%48	66.6%38	18.5%60	37.9%28
Logan Duncomb	309	1,933	13.8%	4.654	114.062	109.444	54.1%62	34.5%64	18.2%38	48.4%86	52.2%42	66.1%38	19.6%68	36.7%30
Tai Hamilton	307	1,935	13.7%	5.056	114.462	109.444	53.8%62	34.9%66	17.8%40	47.6%84	51.9%44	68.2%46	18.4%60	36.6%30
Yoro Diallo	274	1,967	12.2%	4.054	113.962	109.942	53.8%62	34.2%64	17.4%44	45.9%82	51.6%46	66.7%42	18.4%60	35.8%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.