Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley10-16

WAC

10-16NET#248
Schedule
LSouth Dakota St. logoSouth Dakota St. logoWLNorth Dakota St. logoNorth Dakota St. logoLStony Brook logoStony Brook logoLTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoWLTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoWSam Houston St. logoSam Houston St. logoWLCreighton logoCreighton logoLNebraska Omaha logoNebraska Omaha logoLTexas Tech logoTexas Tech logoLOklahoma logoOklahoma logoLCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoWCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoWUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoWLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoWGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoWCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logo

Team Stats

26 games
  • Net Rating-5.029
  • Offensive Rating104.935
  • Defensive Rating109.938
  • Pace67.267
  • Effective FG%46.8%16
  • Off Rebound Pct27.4%46
  • Turnover Pct19.1%66
  • FT Attempt Rate35.1%69

Team Stats

26 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-5.029
  • Offensive Rating104.935
  • Defensive Rating109.938
  • Pace67.267
  • Effective FG%46.8%16
  • Off Rebound Pct27.4%46
  • Turnover Pct19.1%66
  • FT Attempt Rate35.1%69

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct38.5%25
  • Point Margin / Game-3.328
  • Points / Game70.551
  • Points Allowed / Game73.822
  • 1st Half Margin-3.417
  • 2nd Half Margin0.052
  • Avg Largest Lead8.732
  • Avg Largest Deficit11.142

Box Score

  • Points / Game70.551
  • Rebounds / Game32.718
  • Assists / Game13.568
  • ORebs / Game10.156
  • DRebs / Game22.66
  • Steals / Game7.890
  • Blocks / Game3.568
  • Turnovers / Game12.859
  • PFs / Game20.86

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.848
  • FGAs / Game59.172
  • Field Goal Pct42.0%31
  • 2PMs / Game19.177
  • 2PAs / Game41.593
  • 2-Point Pct46.1%14
  • 3PMs / Game5.714
  • 3PAs / Game17.611
  • 3-Point Pct32.4%40
  • FTMs / Game15.283
  • FTAs / Game20.778
  • Free Throw Pct73.1%72

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s54.3%81
  • % Pts from 3s24.2%11
  • % Pts from FTs21.5%86
  • Paint Pts / Game20.555
  • % Pts in Paint29.1%54
  • Fast Break Pts / Game10.997
  • % Pts on Fast Break15.4%98
  • Points off TOVs / Game15.895
  • % Pts off TOVs22.5%97
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.532
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.866

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %51.7%26
  • Points / Shot1.1932
  • 3-Point Att Rate29.8%9
  • Assist Pct54.4%71
  • Assists / 100 Poss20.157
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.05x68
  • PF Drawn / Game19.080

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%53.1%10
  • Opp True Shooting %57.9%4
  • Opp Field Goal Pct46.3%12
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.1%30
  • Opp 3-Point Pct37.8%4
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.0%64
  • Opp FT Att Rate44.2%5
  • Opp Points / Shot1.383

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game73.822
  • Paint Pts Allowed24.120
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed8.512
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.837
  • Opp Assist Pct59.3%8
  • TOVs Forced / Game16.797

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct70.8%34
  • Turnovers Forced Pct24.8%92
  • Steal Pct11.6%84
  • Block Pct5.2%63
  • Hakeem Pct16.8%80
  • PF Efficiency1.09x21
  • Steals / PF0.37x59
  • Blocks / PF0.17x50

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 353 D-I teams
  • #12Opp TOV%23.7%
  • #19FB Pts %18.1%
  • #20PO TOV Diff+82
  • #105AST%54.4%
  • #111FTAR35.1%
  • #123TOV%18.3%
  • #191OREB%27.4%
  • #2133P%32.4%
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #12Opp TOV%23.7%
  • #19FB Pts %18.1%
  • #20PO TOV Diff+82
  • #105AST%54.4%
  • #111FTAR35.1%
  • #123TOV%18.3%
  • #191OREB%27.4%
  • #2133P%32.4%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #339Opp 3P%37.8%
  • #317Opp eFG%53.1%
  • #298eFG%46.8%
  • #280REB Diff-90
  • #277Paint Pts %34.1%
  • #2763PM Diff-41
  • #267TS%51.1%
  • #252SOS-3.7

Most Similar Seasons

to 2019-20
Find Similar
  1. 1UC Davis logoUC Davis logoUC Davis 2020-219-8Big West89
  2. 2Southern logoSouthern logoSouthern 2025-2614-17SWAC88
  3. 3Texas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris 2016-1721-12Southland85
  4. 4Lamar logoLamar logoLamar 2019-2014-15Southland85
  5. 5Abilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian 2023-2415-18WAC84
  6. 6Abilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian 2022-239-17WAC83
  7. 7Loyola MD logoLoyola MD logoLoyola MD 2018-1911-21Patriot82
  8. 8Sacramento St. logoSacramento St. logoSacramento St. 2018-1912-16Big Sky82
  9. 9Bowling Green logoBowling Green logoBowling Green 2016-1712-19MAC82
  10. 10Portland St. logoPortland St. logoPortland St. 2021-2212-17Big Sky80
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Javon Levi headshotJavonLeviJrLesley Varner II headshotLesley VarnerIISrSean Rhea headshotSeanRheaSoJordan Jackson headshotJordanJacksonSrChris Freeman headshotChrisFreemanJrQuinton Johnson II headshotQuinton JohnsonIIFr
Uche Dibiamaka headshotUcheDibiamakaSo
IFIsaiahFontaineSr
JGJamalGainesFr
RJRob McClainJrJr
CRConnorRainesFr
ABAnthonyBrattonJr
IGIsaiahGarciaFr
J. LeviJr5'11"+0.982––46.6%2124.8%8811.43.38.037.2%72.9%
L. Varner IISr6'7"+0.877––55.6%6125.9%9015.66.01.742.0%88.7%
S. RheaSo6'8"-0.339––64.0%8815.2%306.04.60.40.0%60.0%
J. JacksonSr6'3"-0.625––55.6%6128.4%9515.02.82.026.3%84.8%
C. FreemanJr6'6"-0.818––50.8%3617.9%506.42.21.034.7%57.1%
Q. Johnson IIFr6'4"-0.817––51.5%4020.3%677.93.11.027.4%54.3%
U. DibiamakaSo6'4"-1.53––42.6%1316.2%373.11.61.422.7%59.1%
I. FontaineSr6'9"–––63.2%8611.4%112.12.10.00.0%61.5%
J. GainesFr6'8"–––33.6%79.9%70.81.40.00.0%20.0%
R. McClain JrJr6'5"–––51.2%3911.4%112.62.60.722.7%30.0%
C. RainesFr6'6"–––64.6%8913.7%213.90.80.535.3%86.4%
A. BrattonJr6'8"–––68.0%9212.3%144.12.50.10.0%60.0%
I. GarciaFr5'10"–––128.6%9915.2%301.30.00.050.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1195.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#240-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#334-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#269-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#300-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#248-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#194-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#258-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#292-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#345-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#326-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#305-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
51.1%#263
Effective FG %
46.8%#297
3-Point %
32.4%#211
3PAR
29.8%#320
FTAR
35.1%#109
Assist %
54.4%#103

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
28.4%#312
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
40.1%#344
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

8 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 39.7% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9339.7%0.97Middle (11–20s): 35.5% of shots at 0.92 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0735.5%0.92Late (21s+): 24.8% of shots at 0.91 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0024.8%0.91SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9420D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.976139.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.921035.5% of shots
Late 21s+0.912024.8% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 33.6% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9333.6%1.16Middle (11–20s): 35.0% of shots at 1.10 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0735.0%1.10Late (21s+): 31.4% of shots at 0.92 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0131.4%0.92SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0713Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s1.16433.6% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.103535.0% of shots
Late 21s+0.927831.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.