Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley8-23

WAC

8-23NET#305
Schedule
LSam Houston St. logoSam Houston St. logoLHouston logoHouston logoWWTennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech logoLPurdue Fort Wayne logoPurdue Fort Wayne logoLTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoWUTSA logoUTSA logoWLamar logoLamar logoLBradley logoBradley logoLSIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville logoLUTSA logoUTSA logoLTCU logoTCU logoLSMU logoSMU logoLDuquesne logoDuquesne logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLTexas A&M logoTexas A&M logoLIdaho logoIdaho logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLIdaho logoIdaho logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logo

Team Stats

31 games
  • Net Rating-9.920
  • Offensive Rating102.94
  • Defensive Rating112.866
  • Pace62.971
  • Effective FG%45.3%6
  • Off Rebound Pct29.2%30
  • Turnover Pct19.2%69
  • FT Attempt Rate35.8%18

Team Stats

31 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-9.920
  • Offensive Rating102.94
  • Defensive Rating112.866
  • Pace62.971
  • Effective FG%45.3%6
  • Off Rebound Pct29.2%30
  • Turnover Pct19.2%69
  • FT Attempt Rate35.8%18

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct25.8%11
  • Point Margin / Game-6.218
  • Points / Game64.716
  • Points Allowed / Game71.045
  • 1st Half Margin-2.826
  • 2nd Half Margin-3.513
  • Avg Largest Lead––
  • Avg Largest Deficit––

Box Score

  • Points / Game64.716
  • Rebounds / Game32.523
  • Assists / Game12.144
  • ORebs / Game10.848
  • DRebs / Game21.814
  • Steals / Game6.876
  • Blocks / Game2.415
  • Turnovers / Game12.157
  • PFs / Game20.622

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.331
  • FGAs / Game56.771
  • Field Goal Pct41.1%14
  • 2PMs / Game18.561
  • 2PAs / Game39.677
  • 2-Point Pct46.7%28
  • 3PMs / Game4.810
  • 3PAs / Game17.139
  • 3-Point Pct27.9%1
  • FTMs / Game13.415
  • FTAs / Game20.322
  • Free Throw Pct66.0%15

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s57.2%93
  • % Pts from 3s22.1%19
  • % Pts from FTs20.7%27
  • Paint Pts / Game16.767
  • % Pts in Paint25.8%76
  • Fast Break Pts / Game2.860
  • % Pts on Fast Break4.3%64
  • Points off TOVs / Game13.796
  • % Pts off TOVs21.2%99
  • 1st Half Pts / Game30.122
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game33.28

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %49.3%3
  • Points / Shot1.142
  • 3-Point Att Rate30.1%31
  • Assist Pct52.1%56
  • Assists / 100 Poss19.329
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.01x50
  • PF Drawn / Game18.327

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.8%37
  • Opp True Shooting %55.4%34
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.7%41
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.3%22
  • Opp 3-Point Pct33.2%70
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.8%14
  • Opp FT Att Rate46.4%18
  • Opp Points / Shot1.3326

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game71.045
  • Paint Pts Allowed18.423
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.331
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.331
  • Opp Assist Pct60.2%6
  • TOVs Forced / Game14.391

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct65.4%12
  • Turnovers Forced Pct22.7%75
  • Steal Pct10.8%60
  • Block Pct3.7%9
  • Hakeem Pct14.6%30
  • PF Efficiency1.13x12
  • Steals / PF0.33x63
  • Blocks / PF0.11x10

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 27 D-I teams
  • #1PO TOV Diff+84
  • #25Opp TOV%21.3%
  • #90FB Pts %7.6%
  • #111Opp 3P%33.2%
  • #114Paint Pts %40.1%
  • #136TOV%17.9%
  • #157AST%52.1%
  • #212Adj DRtg107.0
Where they rank bestof 27 D-I teams
  • #1PO TOV Diff+84
  • #25Opp TOV%21.3%
  • #90FB Pts %7.6%
  • #111Opp 3P%33.2%
  • #114Paint Pts %40.1%
  • #136TOV%17.9%
  • #157AST%52.1%
  • #212Adj DRtg107.0
Where they rank worstof 27 D-I teams
  • #3473P%27.9%
  • #341TS%48.8%
  • #332Adj ORtg94.5
  • #331eFG%45.3%
  • #328REB Diff-159
  • #310Opp OREB%34.6%
  • #3003PM Diff-53
  • #294Pts Diff-193

Most Similar Seasons

to 2013-14
Find Similar
  1. 1Louisiana logoLouisiana logoLouisiana 2024-2511-21Sun Belt87
  2. 2South Carolina St. logoSouth Carolina St. logoSouth Carolina St. 2014-159-22MEAC86
  3. 3UC Riverside logoUC Riverside logoUC Riverside 2016-176-21Big West84
  4. 4Manhattan logoManhattan logoManhattan 2022-2311-18MAAC83
  5. 5Abilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian 2017-1812-16Southland82
  6. 6Morgan St. logoMorgan St. logoMorgan St. 2015-168-21MEAC81
  7. 7Albany logoAlbany logoAlbany 2021-2213-18America East81
  8. 8USC Upstate logoUSC Upstate logoUSC Upstate 2022-2314-16Big South81
  9. 9Loyola MD logoLoyola MD logoLoyola MD 2013-1410-19Patriot80
  10. 10Hampton logoHampton logoHampton 2016-1712-17MEAC80
Schedule
Loading the schedule
SBShaquilleBogaJrJFJavornFarrellSr
LTLauriToivonenJr
JLJustinLeathersSr
JCJoshClevelandSr
SHShaquilleHinesSo
JDJamalDantzlerSr
HJHurleyJohnsonSr
BPBlakeProvostSo
CHChristianHildebrandtJr
AMAlexMajewskiFrLMLJMcIntoshFrMSMarcelSimonFrJRJacobRaspopovichFr
S. BogaJr5'11"-0.339––49.8%3824.4%8714.23.43.235.3%71.0%
J. FarrellSr6'5"-0.530––50.0%3928.9%9616.05.43.223.1%74.3%
L. ToivonenJr6'7"-0.529––48.0%319.3%72.32.50.725.0%60.0%
J. LeathersSr6'5"-0.819––48.6%3315.5%335.83.81.033.3%79.2%
J. ClevelandSr6'6"-1.011––54.4%6215.6%345.33.40.60.0%52.8%
S. HinesSo6'7"-1.35––51.8%4823.3%8312.86.31.519.4%57.9%
J. DantzlerSr6'3"–––51.3%4519.2%592.11.30.320.0%41.9%
H. JohnsonSr6'1"–––47.6%3018.4%543.91.30.821.4%58.7%
B. ProvostSo5'10"–––23.7%59.5%70.30.30.216.7%100.0%
C. HildebrandtJr6'4"–––40.3%1514.9%291.30.70.428.6%77.8%
A. MajewskiFr6'7"–––51.2%4517.1%443.01.20.233.9%70.0%
LJ McIntoshFr6'1"–––36.4%1118.1%512.30.70.621.6%63.6%
M. SimonFr6'5"–––0.0%220.6%690.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. RaspopovichFr6'1"–––0.0%28.3%50.00.60.80.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1195.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#240-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#334-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#269-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#300-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#248-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#194-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#258-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#292-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#345-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#326-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#305-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
48.8%#341
Effective FG %
45.3%#330
3-Point %
27.9%#347
3PAR
30.1%#242
FTAR
35.8%#288
Assist %
52.1%#155

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
37.6%#125
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
27.9%#110
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

9 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 52.7% of shots at 0.62 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7152.7%0.62Middle (11–20s): 28.1% of shots at 1.18 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2628.1%1.18Late (21s+): 19.3% of shots at 1.31 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2119.3%1.31SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9114D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.621152.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.182328.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.318219.3% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.0% of shots at 0.72 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7348.0%0.72Middle (11–20s): 22.5% of shots at 1.21 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2722.5%1.21Late (21s+): 29.5% of shots at 1.28 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2329.5%1.28SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9947Allowed, D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.725448.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.217422.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.283129.5% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 350 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 13-14. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 13-14. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.