Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley19-17

WAC

19-17NET#194
Schedule
WEast Texas A&M logoEast Texas A&M logoLOklahoma logoOklahoma logoWTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoWPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoLEast Carolina logoEast Carolina logoLGeorgia Tech logoGeorgia Tech logoWLamar logoLamar logoWTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoLHouston logoHouston logoWUT Arlington logoUT Arlington logoWNorth Dakota logoNorth Dakota logoLTexas St. logoLRice logoRice logoWMcNeese St. logoMcNeese St. logoLTexas Tech logoTexas Tech logoLUC Irvine logoUC Irvine logoWCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoWGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoWCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoLCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoWCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWGrambling St. logoGrambling St. logoLTexas Southern logoTexas Southern logo

Team Stats

36 games
  • Net Rating-0.349
  • Offensive Rating105.721
  • Defensive Rating106.072
  • Pace67.069
  • Effective FG%46.3%8
  • Off Rebound Pct26.5%34
  • Turnover Pct19.0%64
  • FT Attempt Rate43.0%98

Team Stats

36 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-0.349
  • Offensive Rating105.721
  • Defensive Rating106.072
  • Pace67.069
  • Effective FG%46.3%8
  • Off Rebound Pct26.5%34
  • Turnover Pct19.0%64
  • FT Attempt Rate43.0%98

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct52.8%58
  • Point Margin / Game-0.249
  • Points / Game70.842
  • Points Allowed / Game71.058
  • 1st Half Margin-2.524
  • 2nd Half Margin2.378
  • Avg Largest Lead8.126
  • Avg Largest Deficit12.431

Box Score

  • Points / Game70.842
  • Rebounds / Game32.820
  • Assists / Game13.456
  • ORebs / Game9.950
  • DRebs / Game22.811
  • Steals / Game9.399
  • Blocks / Game2.836
  • Turnovers / Game12.756
  • PFs / Game20.94

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.127
  • FGAs / Game57.853
  • Field Goal Pct41.7%17
  • 2PMs / Game18.874
  • 2PAs / Game40.795
  • 2-Point Pct46.2%12
  • 3PMs / Game5.33
  • 3PAs / Game17.14
  • 3-Point Pct31.2%13
  • FTMs / Game17.398
  • FTAs / Game24.998
  • Free Throw Pct69.4%38

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s53.0%80
  • % Pts from 3s22.6%2
  • % Pts from FTs24.4%100
  • Paint Pts / Game22.659
  • % Pts in Paint31.9%63
  • Fast Break Pts / Game8.089
  • % Pts on Fast Break11.3%91
  • Points off TOVs / Game16.999
  • % Pts off TOVs23.8%100
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.423
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game38.869

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %51.5%14
  • Points / Shot1.2341
  • 3-Point Att Rate29.6%3
  • Assist Pct55.8%81
  • Assists / 100 Poss20.144
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.06x60
  • PF Drawn / Game22.2100

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.3%56
  • Opp True Shooting %54.9%47
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.5%45
  • Opp 2-Point Pct50.3%49
  • Opp 3-Point Pct33.5%67
  • Opp 3PA Rate34.6%87
  • Opp FT Att Rate43.6%3
  • Opp Points / Shot1.3122

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game71.058
  • Paint Pts Allowed23.238
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.623
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.747
  • Opp Assist Pct56.9%14
  • TOVs Forced / Game17.699

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct66.7%6
  • Turnovers Forced Pct26.2%94
  • Steal Pct13.8%96
  • Block Pct4.2%30
  • Hakeem Pct18.1%88
  • PF Efficiency0.94x72
  • Steals / PF0.44x90
  • Blocks / PF0.14x25

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 119 D-I teams
  • #1PO TOV Diff+204
  • #3Opp TOV%24.7%
  • #7FTAR43.0%
  • #67AST%55.8%
  • #70FB Pts %12.8%
  • #102Adj DRtg101.0
  • #119Opp 3P%33.5%
  • #121TOV%17.9%
Where they rank bestof 119 D-I teams
  • #1PO TOV Diff+204
  • #3Opp TOV%24.7%
  • #7FTAR43.0%
  • #67AST%55.8%
  • #70FB Pts %12.8%
  • #102Adj DRtg101.0
  • #119Opp 3P%33.5%
  • #121TOV%17.9%
Where they rank worstof 119 D-I teams
  • #347REB Diff-225
  • #334Opp OREB%33.3%
  • #328eFG%46.3%
  • #3123P%31.2%
  • #310TS%50.9%
  • #285Adj ORtg98.9
  • #2653PM Diff-35
  • #243Paint Pts %36.1%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2018-19
Find Similar
  1. 1Prairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M 2019-2017-13SWAC82
  2. 2Abilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian 2023-2415-18WAC77
  3. 3Prairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M 2025-2615-18SWAC72
  4. 4Bethune Cookman logoBethune Cookman logoBethune Cookman 2023-2415-17SWAC72
  5. 5UC Davis logoUC Davis logoUC Davis 2020-219-8Big West71
  6. 6Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logoTarleton St. 2025-2610-18WAC71
  7. 7UTEP logoUTEP logoUTEP 2023-2415-16C-USA70
  8. 8Southern logoSouthern logoSouthern 2021-2215-14SWAC69
  9. 9Prairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M 2018-1921-13SWAC69
  10. 10Jackson St. logoJackson St. logoJackson St. 2019-2013-17SWAC69
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Javon Levi headshotJavonLeviSoLesley Varner II headshotLesley VarnerIIJrJordan Jackson headshotJordanJacksonJrTyson Smith headshotTysonSmithSr
Solomon Hainna headshotSolomonHainnaSr
Terry Winn III headshotTerry WinnIIISrGreg Bowie II headshotGreg BowieIISo
IFIsaiahFontaineJr
JCJohnnyCrnogoracSr
MWMarlonWilliamsSo
Uche Dibiamaka headshotUcheDibiamakaFr
NGNdeneGueyeJr
J. LeviSo5'11"+1.286––47.2%2120.7%699.93.95.719.2%66.2%
L. Varner IIJr6'7"+0.672––55.3%5620.5%6811.25.41.130.0%63.0%
J. JacksonJr6'3"+0.360––57.2%6520.2%668.92.81.132.9%71.0%
T. SmithSr6'1"+0.149––56.6%6321.4%7410.82.21.836.1%82.1%
S. HainnaSr6'7"-0.430––49.3%2812.7%153.82.90.516.7%74.6%
T. Winn IIISr6'7"-0.816––51.6%3723.5%8312.64.71.68.3%72.1%
G. Bowie IISo6'2"-1.19––56.2%6119.0%578.72.21.135.5%79.0%
I. FontaineJr6'9"–––45.1%1717.9%481.31.40.10.0%36.0%
J. CrnogoracSr7'1"–––43.5%1417.8%482.11.90.135.7%69.2%
M. WilliamsSo6'2"–––13.8%322.0%770.40.50.40.0%37.5%
U. DibiamakaFr6'3"–––38.9%1014.2%241.81.00.513.6%64.3%
N. GueyeJr6'10"–––45.6%1817.7%473.02.70.30.0%46.2%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1195.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#240-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#334-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#269-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#300-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#248-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#194-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#258-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#292-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#345-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#326-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#305-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
50.9%#308
Effective FG %
46.3%#328
3-Point %
31.2%#310
3PAR
29.6%#340
FTAR
43.0%#7
Assist %
55.8%#67

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
35.4%#179
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
33.4%#325
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

11 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 43.3% of shots at 0.87 points per shot, against a D-I 0.8043.3%0.87Middle (11–20s): 32.6% of shots at 1.08 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2332.6%1.08Late (21s+): 24.2% of shots at 1.10 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1624.2%1.10SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9936D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.877743.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.081232.6% of shots
Late 21s+1.103124.2% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 37.0% of shots at 0.95 points per shot, against a D-I 0.8137.0%0.95Middle (11–20s): 32.3% of shots at 1.25 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2332.3%1.25Late (21s+): 30.7% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1630.7%1.16SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.117Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.951037.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.254932.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.165430.7% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.