



UT Rio Grande ValleyUTRGV19-17
WAC
Team Stats
36 games- Net Rating-0.349
- Offensive Rating105.721
- Defensive Rating106.072
- Pace67.069
- Effective FG%46.3%8
- Off Rebound Pct26.5%34
- Turnover Pct19.0%64
- FT Attempt Rate43.0%98
Team Stats
36 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-0.349
- Offensive Rating105.721
- Defensive Rating106.072
- Pace67.069
- Effective FG%46.3%8
- Off Rebound Pct26.5%34
- Turnover Pct19.0%64
- FT Attempt Rate43.0%98
Results & Margin
- Win Pct52.8%58
- Point Margin / Game-0.249
- Points / Game70.842
- Points Allowed / Game71.058
- 1st Half Margin-2.524
- 2nd Half Margin2.378
- Avg Largest Lead8.126
- Avg Largest Deficit12.431
Box Score
- Points / Game70.842
- Rebounds / Game32.820
- Assists / Game13.456
- ORebs / Game9.950
- DRebs / Game22.811
- Steals / Game9.399
- Blocks / Game2.836
- Turnovers / Game12.756
- PFs / Game20.94
Shooting
- FGMs / Game24.127
- FGAs / Game57.853
- Field Goal Pct41.7%17
- 2PMs / Game18.874
- 2PAs / Game40.795
- 2-Point Pct46.2%12
- 3PMs / Game5.33
- 3PAs / Game17.14
- 3-Point Pct31.2%13
- FTMs / Game17.398
- FTAs / Game24.998
- Free Throw Pct69.4%38
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s53.0%80
- % Pts from 3s22.6%2
- % Pts from FTs24.4%100
- Paint Pts / Game22.659
- % Pts in Paint31.9%63
- Fast Break Pts / Game8.089
- % Pts on Fast Break11.3%91
- Points off TOVs / Game16.999
- % Pts off TOVs23.8%100
- 1st Half Pts / Game31.423
- 2nd Half Pts / Game38.869
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %51.5%14
- Points / Shot1.2341
- 3-Point Att Rate29.6%3
- Assist Pct55.8%81
- Assists / 100 Poss20.144
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.06x60
- PF Drawn / Game22.2100
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%50.3%56
- Opp True Shooting %54.9%47
- Opp Field Goal Pct44.5%45
- Opp 2-Point Pct50.3%49
- Opp 3-Point Pct33.5%67
- Opp 3PA Rate34.6%87
- Opp FT Att Rate43.6%3
- Opp Points / Shot1.3122
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game71.058
- Paint Pts Allowed23.238
- Fast Break Pts Allowed6.623
- Pts off TOVs Allowed11.747
- Opp Assist Pct56.9%14
- TOVs Forced / Game17.699
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct66.7%6
- Turnovers Forced Pct26.2%94
- Steal Pct13.8%96
- Block Pct4.2%30
- Hakeem Pct18.1%88
- PF Efficiency0.94x72
- Steals / PF0.44x90
- Blocks / PF0.14x25
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 119 D-I teams- #1PO TOV Diff+204
- #3Opp TOV%24.7%
- #7FTAR43.0%
- #67AST%55.8%
- #70FB Pts %12.8%
- #102Adj DRtg101.0
- #119Opp 3P%33.5%
- #121TOV%17.9%
- #1PO TOV Diff+204
- #3Opp TOV%24.7%
- #7FTAR43.0%
- #67AST%55.8%
- #70FB Pts %12.8%
- #102Adj DRtg101.0
- #119Opp 3P%33.5%
- #121TOV%17.9%
- #347REB Diff-225
- #334Opp OREB%33.3%
- #328eFG%46.3%
- #3123P%31.2%
- #310TS%50.9%
- #285Adj ORtg98.9
- #2653PM Diff-35
- #243Paint Pts %36.1%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1

Prairie View A&MPVAMU 2019-2017-13SWACMost alike in Adj O, 3PA rate, Adj D82 - 2

Abilene ChristianACU 2023-2415-18WACMost alike in Adj O, 3PA rate, OREB%77 - 3

Prairie View A&MPVAMU 2025-2615-18SWACMost alike in TOV%, Opp eFG%, Opp OREB%72 - 4

Bethune CookmanB-Cookman 2023-2415-17SWACMost alike in Opp eFG%, Tempo, Opp OREB%72 - 5

UC Davis 2020-219-8Big WestMost alike in Adj O, OREB%, Tempo71 - 6

Tarleton St.Tarleton 2025-2610-18WACMost alike in Opp OREB%, Tempo, Opp TOV%71 - 7

UTEP 2023-2415-16C-USAMost alike in FT rate, Adj O, Tempo70 - 8

Southern 2021-2215-14SWACMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, Tempo69 - 9

Prairie View A&MPVAMU 2018-1921-13SWACMost alike in FT rate, Tempo, Opp TOV%69 - 10

Jackson St. 2019-2013-17SWACMost alike in eFG%, 3PA rate, OREB%69
| J. LeviJavon Levi | So | 5'11" | +1.286 | – | – | 47.2%21 | 20.7%69 | 9.9 | 3.9 | 5.7 | 19.2% | 66.2% |
| L. Varner IILesley Varner II | Jr | 6'7" | +0.672 | – | – | 55.3%56 | 20.5%68 | 11.2 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 30.0% | 63.0% |
| J. JacksonJordan Jackson | Jr | 6'3" | +0.360 | – | – | 57.2%65 | 20.2%66 | 8.9 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 32.9% | 71.0% |
| T. SmithTyson Smith | Sr | 6'1" | +0.149 | – | – | 56.6%63 | 21.4%74 | 10.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 36.1% | 82.1% |
| S. HainnaSolomon Hainna | Sr | 6'7" | -0.430 | – | – | 49.3%28 | 12.7%15 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 16.7% | 74.6% |
| T. Winn IIITerry Winn III | Sr | 6'7" | -0.816 | – | – | 51.6%37 | 23.5%83 | 12.6 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 8.3% | 72.1% |
| G. Bowie IIGreg Bowie II | So | 6'2" | -1.19 | – | – | 56.2%61 | 19.0%57 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 35.5% | 79.0% |
| I. FontaineIsaiah Fontaine | Jr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 45.1%17 | 17.9%48 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 36.0% |
| J. CrnogoracJohnny Crnogorac | Sr | 7'1" | – | – | – | 43.5%14 | 17.8%48 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 35.7% | 69.2% |
| M. WilliamsMarlon Williams | So | 6'2" | – | – | – | 13.8%3 | 22.0%77 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 37.5% |
| U. DibiamakaUche Dibiamaka | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 38.9%10 | 14.2%24 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 13.6% | 64.3% |
| N. GueyeNdene Gueye | Jr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 45.6%18 | 17.7%47 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 46.2% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19-14 | #119 | 5.873 | 111.664 | 105.875 | -1.955 | +2952 | +8895 | 29.7%37 | +3324 | 55.6%92 | 37.4%93 | 76.2%88 | |
| 16-15 | #240 | -6.830 | 105.137 | 111.926 | -5.620 | +944 | +10498 | 31.7%63 | +2131 | 52.7%72 | 32.9%35 | 70.7%35 | |
| 6-25 | #334 | -16.06 | 95.95 | 111.917 | -2.151 | -1864 | -618 | 24.9%16 | -1355 | 46.3%6 | 29.3%4 | 70.5%31 | |
| 15-17 | #269 | -6.628 | 105.453 | 112.013 | -2.443 | +11280 | -1631 | 30.9%68 | +1003 | 52.9%80 | 33.9%46 | 69.8%30 | |
| 8-23 | #300 | -13.211 | 100.429 | 113.64 | -2.846 | -1299 | -4615 | 25.5%24 | +6911 | 49.8%41 | 30.4%9 | 69.5%29 | |
| 14-16 | #248 | -5.434 | 99.833 | 105.331 | -5.618 | -6322 | -1935 | 28.6%51 | -14598 | 48.9%35 | 34.3%66 | 71.7%59 | |
| 20-17 | #194 | -2.444 | 99.219 | 101.670 | -1.648 | -2214 | -3128 | 26.9%34 | -18399 | 46.6%6 | 31.9%15 | 69.4%39 | |
| 15-18 | #258 | -8.225 | 99.917 | 108.139 | -3.133 | -8718 | -2435 | 28.5%46 | -6885 | 45.3%3 | 30.9%5 | 74.1%80 | |
| 10-22 | #292 | -11.614 | 99.824 | 111.412 | -4.225 | -9518 | +3774 | 29.7%51 | -1758 | 49.1%31 | 33.6%31 | 71.7%66 | |
| 5-22 | #345 | -21.01 | 95.09 | 116.02 | -4.622 | -2312 | +554 | 23.6%6 | +6710 | 48.0%25 | 33.5%33 | 67.1%21 | |
| 7-21 | #326 | -16.47 | 93.58 | 109.910 | -5.811 | -12311 | -902 | 30.6%44 | +3625 | 46.1%15 | 30.0%7 | 67.6%33 | |
| 8-23 | #305 | -12.813 | 94.95 | 107.639 | -4.922 | -1478 | -4818 | 29.4%28 | -7289 | 45.5%4 | 27.9%1 | 66.1%15 | |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-IShot Profile
vs D-IShot Clock
11 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.







