Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley5-22

WAC

5-22NET#345
Schedule
LMiami FL logoMiami FL logoLNorth Florida logoNorth Florida logoWLPortland St. logoPortland St. logoWSoutheast Missouri St. logoSoutheast Missouri St. logoLHouston logoHouston logoLLamar logoLamar logoWLTennessee Martin logoTennessee Martin logoLTexas St. logoLUtah St. logoUtah St. logoLNorth Dakota St. logoNorth Dakota St. logoLIdaho St. logoIdaho St. logoLUTEP logoUTEP logoWLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLSeattle logoSeattle logo

Team Stats

27 games
  • Net Rating-22.43
  • Offensive Rating106.431
  • Defensive Rating128.810
  • Pace60.915
  • Effective FG%47.2%19
  • Off Rebound Pct23.0%5
  • Turnover Pct19.9%39
  • FT Attempt Rate29.6%6

Team Stats

27 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-22.43
  • Offensive Rating106.431
  • Defensive Rating128.810
  • Pace60.915
  • Effective FG%47.2%19
  • Off Rebound Pct23.0%5
  • Turnover Pct19.9%39
  • FT Attempt Rate29.6%6

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct18.5%3
  • Point Margin / Game-13.62
  • Points / Game64.88
  • Points Allowed / Game78.413
  • 1st Half Margin-8.22
  • 2nd Half Margin-5.45
  • Avg Largest Lead5.15
  • Avg Largest Deficit19.45

Box Score

  • Points / Game64.88
  • Rebounds / Game32.312
  • Assists / Game14.779
  • ORebs / Game8.48
  • DRebs / Game23.926
  • Steals / Game4.712
  • Blocks / Game2.936
  • Turnovers / Game12.166
  • PFs / Game17.979

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.319
  • FGAs / Game56.737
  • Field Goal Pct41.0%17
  • 2PMs / Game16.315
  • 2PAs / Game35.633
  • 2-Point Pct45.7%20
  • 3PMs / Game7.050
  • 3PAs / Game21.159
  • 3-Point Pct33.1%30
  • FTMs / Game11.35
  • FTAs / Game16.85
  • Free Throw Pct67.2%21

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s50.2%50
  • % Pts from 3s32.4%73
  • % Pts from FTs17.4%9
  • Paint Pts / Game18.737
  • % Pts in Paint28.8%42
  • Fast Break Pts / Game2.529
  • % Pts on Fast Break3.8%32
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.730
  • % Pts off TOVs13.4%36
  • 1st Half Pts / Game30.012
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game34.813

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %50.5%12
  • Points / Shot1.147
  • 3-Point Att Rate37.3%66
  • Assist Pct63.2%97
  • Assists / 100 Poss24.187
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.21x77
  • PF Drawn / Game16.64

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%52.1%19
  • Opp True Shooting %55.0%39
  • Opp Field Goal Pct46.7%11
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.9%17
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.0%46
  • Opp 3PA Rate30.5%92
  • Opp FT Att Rate31.1%83
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2556

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game78.413
  • Paint Pts Allowed30.35
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.927
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed13.815
  • Opp Assist Pct56.3%22
  • TOVs Forced / Game9.94

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct64.3%3
  • Turnovers Forced Pct16.2%9
  • Steal Pct7.7%18
  • Block Pct4.8%39
  • Hakeem Pct12.5%21
  • PF Efficiency1.08x23
  • Steals / PF0.26x20
  • Blocks / PF0.16x44

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams
  • #11AST%63.2%
  • #107PO TOV Diff-150
  • #150TOV%17.8%
  • #1513PM Diff+8
  • #192Opp 3P%35.0%
  • #228FB Pts %4.9%
  • #245Paint Pts %33.6%
  • #2483P%33.1%
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #11AST%63.2%
  • #107PO TOV Diff-150
  • #150TOV%17.8%
  • #1513PM Diff+8
  • #192Opp 3P%35.0%
  • #228FB Pts %4.9%
  • #245Paint Pts %33.6%
  • #2483P%33.1%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #346Adj DRtg115.8
  • #345REB Diff-246
  • #342Opp OREB%35.7%
  • #341Pts Diff-368
  • #340Opp TOV%14.5%
  • #334OREB%23.0%
  • #332FTAR29.6%
  • #320Adj ORtg95.3

Most Similar Seasons

to 2015-16
Find Similar
  1. 1The Citadel logoThe Citadel logoThe Citadel 2013-144-24Southern85
  2. 2Cal Poly logoCal Poly logoCal Poly 2018-194-23Big West84
  3. 3Binghamton logoBinghamton logoBinghamton 2018-198-23America East84
  4. 4Stetson logoStetson logoStetson 2014-156-22ASUN83
  5. 5Idaho logoIdaho logoIdaho 2018-193-26Big Sky81
  6. 6Cal Poly logoCal Poly logoCal Poly 2017-187-22Big West80
  7. 7The Citadel logoThe Citadel logoThe Citadel 2022-239-22Southern79
  8. 8Florida Atlantic logoFlorida Atlantic logoFlorida Atlantic 2015-167-24C-USA78
  9. 9Bryant logoBryant logoBryant 2015-167-23NEC78
  10. 10Lafayette logoLafayette logoLafayette 2015-166-24Patriot78
Schedule
Loading the schedule
SHShaquilleHinesSrDSDakotaSlaughterSr
EOEverettOsborneSr
JTJ.J.ThompsonSrDKDanKimasaSoAntonio Green headshotAntonioGreenFrNDNickDixonJr
ARAdonisRwabigwiSo
CIChristopherIkuenobeJr
JPJoaquinPistokacheJr
RMRafikiMuhamadFr
WJWalterJonesFr
OEOtElmoreSo
S. HinesSr6'8"-0.147––55.4%6623.0%8014.35.42.638.3%71.8%
D. SlaughterSr6'7"-0.820––55.5%6718.3%5110.64.42.135.4%74.1%
E. OsborneSr6'4"-0.820––45.7%2519.4%594.82.40.825.4%72.4%
J.J. ThompsonSr6'0"-1.013––46.7%2821.2%719.22.34.830.0%65.4%
D. KimasaSo6'10"-1.110––49.3%3623.9%859.96.61.09.1%67.0%
A. GreenFr6'2"-1.54––50.7%4319.6%6011.34.12.737.1%72.7%
N. DixonJr6'2"-2.80––25.1%624.3%864.53.50.50.0%55.6%
A. RwabigwiSo6'8"–––53.0%5417.0%412.32.10.20.0%58.1%
C. IkuenobeJr6'9"–––52.2%5116.2%362.21.20.30.0%54.5%
J. PistokacheJr6'2"–––26.6%612.8%150.30.10.00.0%50.0%
R. MuhamadFr6'6"––––25.0%890.00.30.00.0%0.0%
W. JonesFr6'4"–––36.4%1111.5%101.21.30.618.2%45.5%
O. ElmoreSo6'2"–––44.0%2111.9%122.51.40.930.8%75.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1195.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#240-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#334-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#269-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#300-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#248-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#194-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#258-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#292-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#345-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#326-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#305-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
50.1%#305
Effective FG %
47.2%#283
3-Point %
33.1%#244
3PAR
37.3%#117
FTAR
29.6%#331
Assist %
63.2%#11

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
25.6%#343
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
37.1%#317
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

8 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.8% of shots at 0.59 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7150.8%0.59Middle (11–20s): 31.7% of shots at 1.24 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2931.7%1.24Late (21s+): 17.5% of shots at 1.26 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2217.5%1.26SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9112D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.59650.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.243431.7% of shots
Late 21s+1.266417.5% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 46.9% of shots at 0.73 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7246.9%0.73Middle (11–20s): 31.4% of shots at 1.48 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3031.4%1.48Late (21s+): 21.7% of shots at 1.12 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2321.7%1.12SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0518Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.734146.9% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.48231.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.128321.7% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.