Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
WAC
UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

5-22NET#348Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #254
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LMiami FL logoLNorth Florida logoWTALPortland St. logoWSoutheast Missouri St. logoLHouston logoLLamar logoWASLTennessee Martin logoLTexas St. logoLUtah St. logoLNorth Dakota St. logoLIdaho St. logoLUTEP logoWOLLGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoWChicago St. logoWUMKC logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoLSeattle logoLNew Mexico St. logoLUtah Valley logoLGrand Canyon logoLUMKC logoWSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoWChicago St. logoLNew Mexico St. logoLSeattle logo

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-18.84
  • Offensive Rating111.049
  • Defensive Rating129.79
  • Pace59.913
  • Effective FG%48.0%24
  • Off Rebound Pct23.0%5
  • Turnover Pct20.8%27
  • FT Attempt Rate30.4%7

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct26.7%9
  • Point Margin / Game-11.23
  • Points / Game66.412
  • Points Allowed / Game77.714
  • 1st Half Margin-6.14
  • 2nd Half Margin-5.13
  • Avg Largest Lead5.65
  • Avg Largest Deficit18.26

Box Score

  • Points / Game66.412
  • Rebounds / Game33.515
  • Assists / Game15.384
  • ORebs / Game8.69
  • DRebs / Game24.943
  • Steals / Game4.812
  • Blocks / Game3.036
  • Turnovers / Game12.555
  • PFs / Game17.977

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.924
  • FGAs / Game57.140
  • Field Goal Pct41.8%20
  • 2PMs / Game16.819
  • 2PAs / Game36.035
  • 2-Point Pct46.7%23
  • 3PMs / Game7.153
  • 3PAs / Game21.158
  • 3-Point Pct33.5%33
  • FTMs / Game11.65
  • FTAs / Game17.37
  • Free Throw Pct67.1%20

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s50.6%54
  • % Pts from 3s31.9%70
  • % Pts from FTs17.5%10
  • Paint Pts / Game19.038
  • % Pts in Paint28.6%42
  • Fast Break Pts / Game2.630
  • % Pts on Fast Break3.9%33
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.629
  • % Pts off TOVs13.0%32
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.218
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game35.214

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %51.3%14
  • Points / Shot1.168
  • 3-Point Att Rate37.0%63
  • Assist Pct64.1%98
  • Assists / 100 Poss25.690
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.23x78
  • PF Drawn / Game16.64

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%52.1%19
  • Opp True Shooting %55.0%39
  • Opp Field Goal Pct46.7%11
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.9%17
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.0%46
  • Opp 3PA Rate30.5%92
  • Opp FT Att Rate31.1%83
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2556

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game77.714
  • Paint Pts Allowed30.35
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.927
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed13.815
  • Opp Assist Pct56.3%22
  • TOVs Forced / Game9.94

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct64.3%3
  • Turnovers Forced Pct16.2%9
  • Steal Pct8.0%20
  • Block Pct5.1%43
  • Hakeem Pct13.0%24
  • PF Efficiency1.19x11
  • Steals / PF0.27x21
  • Blocks / PF0.17x47

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #10AST%64.1%
  • #110PO TOV Diff-152
  • #1653PM Diff+5
  • #170Opp 3P%34.4%
  • #180TOV%18.1%
  • #228FB Pts %5.0%
  • #235Opp eFG%50.8%
  • #2383P%33.5%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #345Adj DRtg116.0
  • #342REB Diff-231
  • #340Pts Diff-337
  • #339Opp TOV%14.8%
  • #336Opp OREB%34.9%
  • #330OREB%23.6%
  • #327FTAR30.4%
  • #322Adj ORtg95.0
Game Log
Loading game log…
SHShaquilleHinesSrDSDakotaSlaughterSrJTJ.J.ThompsonSr
EOEverettOsborneSr
DKDanKimasaSoAntonio Green headshotAntonioGreenFrNDNickDixonJr
ARAdonisRwabigwiSo
CIChristopherIkuenobeJr
JPJoaquinPistokacheJr
RMRafikiMuhamadFr
WJWalterJonesFr
OEOtElmoreSo
S. HinesSr6'8"+0.76155.4%6623.0%8014.35.42.638.3%71.8%
D. SlaughterSr6'7"+0.13255.5%6718.3%5110.64.42.135.4%74.1%
J.J. ThompsonSr6'0"-0.21846.7%2821.2%719.22.34.830.0%65.4%
E. OsborneSr6'4"-0.31445.7%2519.4%594.82.40.825.4%72.4%
D. KimasaSo6'10"-0.41249.3%3623.9%859.96.61.09.1%67.0%
A. GreenFr6'2"-0.7550.7%4319.6%6011.34.12.737.1%72.7%
N. DixonJr6'2"-2.6025.1%624.3%864.53.50.50.0%55.6%
A. RwabigwiSo6'8"53.0%5417.0%412.32.10.20.0%58.1%
C. IkuenobeJr6'9"52.2%5116.2%362.21.20.30.0%54.5%
J. PistokacheJr6'2"26.6%612.8%150.30.10.00.0%50.0%
R. MuhamadFr6'6"25.0%890.00.30.00.0%0.0%
W. JonesFr6'4"36.4%1111.5%101.21.30.618.2%45.5%
O. ElmoreSo6'2"44.0%2111.9%122.51.40.930.8%75.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1005.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#253-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#339-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#260-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#318-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#234-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#198-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#264-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#300-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#348-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#328-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#307-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
50.9%#298
Effective FG %
48.0%#265
3-Point %
33.5%#235
3PAR
37.0%#126
FTAR
30.4%#327
Assist %
64.1%#9

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
28.1%#332
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
35.1%#298
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

9 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.1% of shots at 0.59 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0950.1%0.59Middle (11–20s): 32.5% of shots at 1.26 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0432.5%1.26Late (21s+): 17.4% of shots at 1.18 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9717.4%1.18SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.4% of shots at 0.71 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0748.4%0.71Middle (11–20s): 32.0% of shots at 1.43 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0232.0%1.43Late (21s+): 19.6% of shots at 1.15 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9519.6%1.15SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

9 games
Created byFinished by
J.J. Thompson → Dakota Slaughter: 8 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 5 from three)J.J. Thompson → Shaquille Hines: 10 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 4 from three)J.J. Thompson → Dan Kimasa: 3 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 0 from three)J.J. Thompson → Antonio Green: 8 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 6 from three)Shaquille Hines → Dakota Slaughter: 7 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 3 from three)Shaquille Hines → Dan Kimasa: 3 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Shaquille Hines → Antonio Green: 4 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Shaquille Hines → J.J. Thompson: 4 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Dakota Slaughter → Shaquille Hines: 5 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 2 from three)Dakota Slaughter → Dan Kimasa: 4 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 1 from three)Dakota Slaughter → Everett Osborne: 3 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Antonio Green → Dakota Slaughter: 5 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 3 from three)Antonio Green → Dan Kimasa: 4 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Dan Kimasa → Shaquille Hines: 4 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Thompson29 astHines18 astSlaughter12 astGreen9 astKimasaSlaughter20 madeHines19 madeKimasa14 madeGreen12 madeThompsonOsborne
Hines is the least-assisted finisher — 60% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.