Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley7-21

WAC

7-21NET#326
Schedule
WWUTSA logoUTSA logoWLUtah logoUtah logoLAlabama St. logoAlabama St. logoWNorth Dakota logoNorth Dakota logoLHouston logoHouston logoLSam Houston St. logoSam Houston St. logoWLamar logoLamar logoLSaint Louis logoSaint Louis logoLCreighton logoCreighton logoLNebraska Omaha logoNebraska Omaha logoLDuquesne logoDuquesne logoLKent St. logoKent St. logoWWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLUTSA logoUTSA logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoLUMKC logoUMKC logo

Team Stats

28 games
  • Net Rating-17.27
  • Offensive Rating105.023
  • Defensive Rating122.221
  • Pace56.827
  • Effective FG%44.7%9
  • Off Rebound Pct30.4%46
  • Turnover Pct23.5%21
  • FT Attempt Rate38.6%64

Team Stats

28 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-17.27
  • Offensive Rating105.023
  • Defensive Rating122.221
  • Pace56.827
  • Effective FG%44.7%9
  • Off Rebound Pct30.4%46
  • Turnover Pct23.5%21
  • FT Attempt Rate38.6%64

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct25.0%11
  • Point Margin / Game-9.87
  • Points / Game59.68
  • Points Allowed / Game69.431
  • 1st Half Margin-7.03
  • 2nd Half Margin-2.721
  • Avg Largest Lead––
  • Avg Largest Deficit––

Box Score

  • Points / Game59.68
  • Rebounds / Game31.721
  • Assists / Game12.659
  • ORebs / Game10.447
  • DRebs / Game21.311
  • Steals / Game5.840
  • Blocks / Game3.348
  • Turnovers / Game13.426
  • PFs / Game18.154

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game21.112
  • FGAs / Game51.621
  • Field Goal Pct40.9%21
  • 2PMs / Game17.156
  • 2PAs / Game37.671
  • 2-Point Pct45.6%25
  • 3PMs / Game4.02
  • 3PAs / Game14.06
  • 3-Point Pct28.2%1
  • FTMs / Game13.543
  • FTAs / Game19.950
  • Free Throw Pct67.6%32

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s57.5%93
  • % Pts from 3s19.9%4
  • % Pts from FTs22.6%77
  • Paint Pts / Game19.163
  • % Pts in Paint32.1%81
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.378
  • % Pts on Fast Break7.1%85
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.459
  • % Pts off TOVs17.4%77
  • 1st Half Pts / Game27.27
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game32.417

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %49.4%10
  • Points / Shot1.1513
  • 3-Point Att Rate27.2%9
  • Assist Pct59.9%89
  • Assists / 100 Poss22.367
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.95x42
  • PF Drawn / Game18.559

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.5%34
  • Opp True Shooting %54.7%31
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.5%33
  • Opp 2-Point Pct50.1%26
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.1%53
  • Opp 3PA Rate35.3%41
  • Opp FT Att Rate35.4%59
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2736

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game69.431
  • Paint Pts Allowed23.99
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.935
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed15.02
  • Opp Assist Pct57.0%19
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.242

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct63.4%3
  • Turnovers Forced Pct21.4%59
  • Steal Pct10.1%45
  • Block Pct5.8%49
  • Hakeem Pct15.9%49
  • PF Efficiency0.98x57
  • Steals / PF0.32x41
  • Blocks / PF0.18x49

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams
  • #39AST%59.9%
  • #83FB Pts %8.8%
  • #129FTAR38.6%
  • #166Paint Pts %38.1%
  • #170Opp 3P%34.1%
  • #180Opp TOV%19.0%
  • #190OREB%30.4%
  • #233Opp eFG%50.5%
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #39AST%59.9%
  • #83FB Pts %8.8%
  • #129FTAR38.6%
  • #166Paint Pts %38.1%
  • #170Opp 3P%34.1%
  • #180Opp TOV%19.0%
  • #190OREB%30.4%
  • #233Opp eFG%50.5%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #3473P%28.2%
  • #342Opp OREB%36.6%
  • #3333PM Diff-74
  • #329Pts Diff-274
  • #324Adj ORtg92.8
  • #322TS%48.8%
  • #319eFG%44.7%
  • #315Adj DRtg109.4

Most Similar Seasons

to 2014-15
Find Similar
  1. 1Florida A&M logoFlorida A&M logoFlorida A&M 2017-188-25MEAC92
  2. 2Incarnate Word logoIncarnate Word logoIncarnate Word 2022-239-19Southland87
  3. 3Louisiana Monroe logoLouisiana Monroe 2024-255-25Sun Belt86
  4. 4SIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville 2019-207-23OVC86
  5. 5Saint Francis logoSaint Francis 2021-228-21NEC85
  6. 6Holy Cross logoHoly Cross logoHoly Cross 2021-227-22Patriot85
  7. 7SIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville 2020-218-17OVC85
  8. 8Bethune Cookman logoBethune Cookman logoBethune Cookman 2022-2310-20SWAC85
  9. 9Cal St. Northridge logoCal St. Northridge logoCal St. Northridge 2021-226-22Big West85
  10. 10Texas Southern logoTexas Southern logoTexas Southern 2025-2610-18SWAC84
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JJJanariJoesaarSoEWElijahWatsonFrSBShaquilleBogaSrDKDanKimasaFrSHShaquilleHinesJr
EOEverettOsborneJr
SNShaunNoriegaSr
MMMauriceMcDonaldFr
ABAndreasBigumJr
JPJoaquinPistokacheSo
MLMikeLopezFr
IHIsaiahHobbsFr
J. JoesaarSo6'6"+0.363––64.5%9225.3%9016.96.62.437.8%83.4%
E. WatsonFr6'2"-0.816––41.8%1514.4%252.51.63.10.0%43.5%
S. BogaSr5'11"-1.011––47.1%2723.4%8312.63.03.628.6%75.0%
D. KimasaFr6'9"-1.010––45.5%2217.2%447.36.50.60.0%61.5%
S. HinesJr6'7"-1.18––53.1%5420.9%7012.25.41.40.0%62.9%
E. OsborneJr6'4"-1.27––45.7%2320.1%644.71.40.726.3%75.0%
S. NoriegaSr6'4"-4.70––76.5%9730.4%989.71.30.720.0%66.7%
M. McDonaldFr6'4"–––42.9%1711.8%131.81.00.914.8%47.1%
A. BigumJr6'9"–––41.4%1411.9%131.11.20.60.0%30.8%
J. PistokacheSo6'2"–––50.0%377.6%40.30.10.00.0%0.0%
M. LopezFr6'1"–––0.0%127.6%950.00.00.50.0%0.0%
I. HobbsFr6'4"–––47.6%2817.9%493.21.70.40.0%61.1%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1195.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#240-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#334-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#269-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#300-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#248-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#194-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#258-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#292-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#345-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#326-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#305-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
48.8%#321
Effective FG %
44.7%#319
3-Point %
28.2%#347
3PAR
27.2%#321
FTAR
38.6%#126
Assist %
59.9%#39

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
38.7%#79
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
33.3%#234
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

13 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 51.5% of shots at 0.65 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7151.5%0.65Middle (11–20s): 27.8% of shots at 1.08 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2527.8%1.08Late (21s+): 20.8% of shots at 1.27 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1920.8%1.27SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9016D-I 0.96
Early 0–10s0.652051.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.08727.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.277320.8% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 54.7% of shots at 0.71 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7354.7%0.71Middle (11–20s): 24.1% of shots at 1.15 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2724.1%1.15Late (21s+): 21.2% of shots at 1.35 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2121.2%1.35SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9567Allowed, D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.715754.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.158924.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.35821.2% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 14-15. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 14-15. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.