Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley7-22

WAC

7-22NET#292
Schedule
LTennessee Martin logoTennessee Martin logoLMemphis logoMemphis logoLTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoLIowa logoIowa logoLSoutheast Missouri St. logoSoutheast Missouri St. logoWGrambling St. logoGrambling St. logoWSt. Francis NY logoLTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoLPortland St. logoPortland St. logoLPortland logoPortland logoWTexas St. logoWNorth Florida logoNorth Florida logoWLamar logoLamar logoLHouston logoHouston logoWWWWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoWChicago St. logoChicago St. logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUMKC logoUMKC logo

Team Stats

29 games
  • Net Rating-10.117
  • Offensive Rating99.912
  • Defensive Rating110.043
  • Pace76.9100
  • Effective FG%48.3%25
  • Off Rebound Pct29.4%51
  • Turnover Pct20.4%35
  • FT Attempt Rate32.5%26

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-10.117
  • Offensive Rating99.912
  • Defensive Rating110.043
  • Pace76.9100
  • Effective FG%48.3%25
  • Off Rebound Pct29.4%51
  • Turnover Pct20.4%35
  • FT Attempt Rate32.5%26

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct24.1%9
  • Point Margin / Game-7.813
  • Points / Game76.880
  • Points Allowed / Game84.52
  • 1st Half Margin-4.314
  • 2nd Half Margin-3.413
  • Avg Largest Lead7.220
  • Avg Largest Deficit15.016

Box Score

  • Points / Game76.880
  • Rebounds / Game36.264
  • Assists / Game14.371
  • ORebs / Game11.982
  • DRebs / Game24.437
  • Steals / Game7.489
  • Blocks / Game2.626
  • Turnovers / Game15.73
  • PFs / Game24.51

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game26.878
  • FGAs / Game63.997
  • Field Goal Pct41.9%19
  • 2PMs / Game18.661
  • 2PAs / Game38.772
  • 2-Point Pct48.0%35
  • 3PMs / Game8.274
  • 3PAs / Game25.392
  • 3-Point Pct32.5%20
  • FTMs / Game15.064
  • FTAs / Game20.857
  • Free Throw Pct72.3%70

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s48.3%36
  • % Pts from 3s32.1%63
  • % Pts from FTs19.6%48
  • Paint Pts / Game22.669
  • % Pts in Paint29.4%57
  • Fast Break Pts / Game5.383
  • % Pts on Fast Break6.9%80
  • Points off TOVs / Game15.997
  • % Pts off TOVs20.8%93
  • 1st Half Pts / Game34.963
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game40.076

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %52.5%25
  • Points / Shot1.2022
  • 3-Point Att Rate39.5%72
  • Assist Pct53.6%59
  • Assists / 100 Poss18.732
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.91x27
  • PF Drawn / Game18.950

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%54.3%9
  • Opp True Shooting %58.7%5
  • Opp Field Goal Pct47.9%6
  • Opp 2-Point Pct53.6%9
  • Opp 3-Point Pct37.0%18
  • Opp 3PA Rate34.5%69
  • Opp FT Att Rate52.3%1
  • Opp Points / Shot1.441

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game84.52
  • Paint Pts Allowed30.91
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed7.82
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed19.00
  • Opp Assist Pct60.4%6
  • TOVs Forced / Game15.795

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct68.2%19
  • Turnovers Forced Pct20.4%66
  • Steal Pct9.7%63
  • Block Pct3.3%10
  • Hakeem Pct13.0%32
  • PF Efficiency1.30x0
  • Steals / PF0.30x40
  • Blocks / PF0.10x5

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 350 D-I teams
  • #72Opp TOV%20.3%
  • #107PO TOV Diff-93
  • #109FB Pts %8.3%
  • #1213PM Diff+21
  • #144AST%53.6%
  • #175OREB%29.4%
  • #249Adj ORtg100.1
  • #249Paint Pts %34.2%
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
  • #72Opp TOV%20.3%
  • #107PO TOV Diff-93
  • #109FB Pts %8.3%
  • #1213PM Diff+21
  • #144AST%53.6%
  • #175OREB%29.4%
  • #249Adj ORtg100.1
  • #249Paint Pts %34.2%
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
  • #318Opp eFG%54.3%
  • #308Adj DRtg111.2
  • #305Pts Diff-225
  • #296TOV%20.4%
  • #290Opp 3P%37.0%
  • #284REB Diff-104
  • #284Opp OREB%31.8%
  • #2813P%32.5%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2016-17
Find Similar
  1. 1Fairleigh Dickinson logoFairleigh Dickinson logoFairleigh Dickinson 2023-2413-17NEC84
  2. 2Army logoArmy logoArmy 2014-1514-15Patriot81
  3. 3Houston Christian logoHouston Christian logoHouston Christian 2020-215-19Southland80
  4. 4UNC Asheville logoUNC Asheville logoUNC Asheville 2014-1512-16Big South80
  5. 5Tulane logoTulane logoTulane 2016-176-25American79
  6. 6Sacred Heart logoSacred Heart logoSacred Heart 2024-2514-18MAAC78
  7. 7UT Arlington logoUT Arlington logoUT Arlington 2014-1515-15Sun Belt78
  8. 8Middle Tennessee logoMiddle Tennessee logoMiddle Tennessee 2019-205-23C-USA77
  9. 9UMass Lowell logoUMass Lowell logoUMass Lowell 2015-1610-18America East77
  10. 10Albany logoAlbany logoAlbany 2023-2412-19America East77
Schedule
Loading the schedule
N. DixonJr6'2"+1.490––61.5%8330.5%9818.85.13.432.9%76.4%
M. HoffmanJr6'9"+0.567––58.2%7117.0%427.94.00.735.0%82.6%
L. StallworthSo6'1"-0.143––53.5%4719.0%578.62.43.633.8%69.0%
X. McDaniel Jr.Fr6'6"-0.527––48.7%2720.0%647.04.00.937.9%70.3%
M. McDonaldJr6'4"-0.817––54.8%5415.3%314.31.31.221.8%70.5%
A. GreenSo6'2"-0.914––55.4%5725.0%8816.73.31.836.3%81.6%
A. RwabigwiJr6'8"–––47.1%2210.3%81.41.90.10.0%47.6%
D. KimasaJr6'10"–––50.3%3315.0%283.33.30.610.0%66.7%
W. JonesSo6'4"–––44.0%1612.7%161.82.20.625.0%40.0%
S. YonSo6'0"–––53.2%4624.3%860.70.70.30.0%100.0%
L. Varner Jr.Fr6'7"–––45.3%1816.9%424.12.30.922.2%65.6%
M. NwabuzorJr6'2"–––38.0%1016.0%351.91.30.626.3%68.2%
G. LoyJr6'9"–––41.8%1316.4%383.12.90.829.0%64.3%
N. MoraFr6'0"–––16.6%315.0%280.10.50.10.0%0.0%
C. CooperFr6'0"–––0.0%114.8%270.00.30.00.0%0.0%
O. DemirerFr6'2"–––60.0%7834.2%991.20.00.00.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo25-2619-14#1195.873111.664105.875-1.955+2952+889529.7%37+332455.6%9237.4%9376.2%88
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo24-2516-15#240-6.830105.137111.926-5.620+944+1049831.7%63+213152.7%7232.9%3570.7%35
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo23-246-25#334-16.0695.95111.917-2.151-1864-61824.9%16-135546.3%629.3%470.5%31
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo22-2315-17#269-6.628105.453112.013-2.443+11280-163130.9%68+100352.9%8033.9%4669.8%30
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo21-228-23#300-13.211100.429113.64-2.846-1299-461525.5%24+691149.8%4130.4%969.5%29
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo19-2014-16#248-5.43499.833105.331-5.618-6322-193528.6%51-1459848.9%3534.3%6671.7%59
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo18-1920-17#194-2.44499.219101.670-1.648-2214-312826.9%34-1839946.6%631.9%1569.4%39
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo17-1815-18#258-8.22599.917108.139-3.133-8718-243528.5%46-688545.3%330.9%574.1%80
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo16-1710-22#292-11.61499.824111.412-4.225-9518+377429.7%51-175849.1%3133.6%3171.7%66
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo15-165-22#345-21.0195.09116.02-4.622-2312+55423.6%6+671048.0%2533.5%3367.1%21
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo14-157-21#326-16.4793.58109.910-5.811-12311-90230.6%44+362546.1%1530.0%767.6%33
UT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo13-148-23#305-12.81394.95107.639-4.922-1478-481829.4%28-728945.5%427.9%166.1%15

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
52.0%#260
Effective FG %
48.3%#260
3-Point %
32.5%#278
3PAR
39.5%#97
FTAR
32.5%#257
Assist %
53.6%#141

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
22.9%#346
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
34.9%#294
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

5 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 54.0% of shots at 0.85 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7154.0%0.85Middle (11–20s): 29.0% of shots at 1.25 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3029.0%1.25Late (21s+): 17.1% of shots at 1.11 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2217.1%1.11SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0156D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.859554.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.253029.0% of shots
Late 21s+1.111317.1% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 54.5% of shots at 0.83 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7254.5%0.83Middle (11–20s): 26.0% of shots at 1.66 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3226.0%1.66Late (21s+): 19.4% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2319.4%1.06SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0911Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.831054.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.66026.0% of shots
Late 21s+1.069519.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.