Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logo

Chicago St.1-28

WACCoach: Tracy Dildy

1-28NET#347
Schedule
WLIowa St. logoIowa St. logoWWLIllinois logoIllinois logoLJacksonville St. logoJacksonville St. logoLAlabama St. logoAlabama St. logoLNorthern Illinois logoLDePaul logoDePaul logoLValparaiso logoValparaiso logoLNorthwestern logoNorthwestern logoLMinnesota logoMinnesota logoWWestern Illinois logoWestern Illinois logoLMarquette logoMarquette logoLOakland logoOakland logoLBall St. logoBall St. logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLGreen Bay logoGreen Bay logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logo

Team Stats

29 games
  • Net Rating-25.52
  • Offensive Rating99.08
  • Defensive Rating124.513
  • Pace63.326
  • Effective FG%42.6%1
  • Off Rebound Pct29.5%49
  • Turnover Pct22.7%12
  • FT Attempt Rate28.1%3

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-25.52
  • Offensive Rating99.08
  • Defensive Rating124.513
  • Pace63.326
  • Effective FG%42.6%1
  • Off Rebound Pct29.5%49
  • Turnover Pct22.7%12
  • FT Attempt Rate28.1%3

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct3.4%0
  • Point Margin / Game-16.10
  • Points / Game62.73
  • Points Allowed / Game78.812
  • 1st Half Margin-8.51
  • 2nd Half Margin-7.60
  • Avg Largest Lead4.42
  • Avg Largest Deficit23.02

Box Score

  • Points / Game62.73
  • Rebounds / Game35.141
  • Assists / Game10.68
  • ORebs / Game12.180
  • DRebs / Game23.011
  • Steals / Game6.673
  • Blocks / Game2.936
  • Turnovers / Game14.411
  • PFs / Game21.79

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game22.26
  • FGAs / Game60.484
  • Field Goal Pct36.7%0
  • 2PMs / Game15.17
  • 2PAs / Game36.947
  • 2-Point Pct40.9%1
  • 3PMs / Game7.154
  • 3PAs / Game23.585
  • 3-Point Pct30.1%6
  • FTMs / Game11.24
  • FTAs / Game17.06
  • Free Throw Pct66.1%13

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s48.2%30
  • % Pts from 3s33.8%82
  • % Pts from FTs17.9%14
  • Paint Pts / Game19.942
  • % Pts in Paint31.7%56
  • Fast Break Pts / Game5.683
  • % Pts on Fast Break8.9%92
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.864
  • % Pts off TOVs18.8%86
  • 1st Half Pts / Game29.38
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game33.34

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %46.1%0
  • Points / Shot1.040
  • 3-Point Att Rate38.9%76
  • Assist Pct47.9%23
  • Assists / 100 Poss16.88
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.74x4
  • PF Drawn / Game17.06

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%54.5%4
  • Opp True Shooting %58.3%4
  • Opp Field Goal Pct46.1%17
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.8%17
  • Opp 3-Point Pct38.7%4
  • Opp 3PA Rate43.5%1
  • Opp FT Att Rate43.6%12
  • Opp Points / Shot1.393

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game78.812
  • Paint Pts Allowed23.639
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed5.911
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed14.411
  • Opp Assist Pct67.3%0
  • TOVs Forced / Game13.471

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct66.6%11
  • Turnovers Forced Pct21.2%76
  • Steal Pct10.4%74
  • Block Pct4.5%33
  • Hakeem Pct14.9%58
  • PF Efficiency1.28x1
  • Steals / PF0.30x42
  • Blocks / PF0.13x24

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 251 D-I teams
  • #47FB Pts %10.2%
  • #107Opp TOV%19.2%
  • #181OREB%29.5%
  • #186SOS-0.7
  • #215Paint Pts %36.7%
  • #272AST%47.9%
  • #310TOV%20.5%
  • #311REB Diff-157
Where they rank bestof 251 D-I teams
  • #47FB Pts %10.2%
  • #107Opp TOV%19.2%
  • #181OREB%29.5%
  • #186SOS-0.7
  • #215Paint Pts %36.7%
  • #272AST%47.9%
  • #310TOV%20.5%
  • #311REB Diff-157
Where they rank worstof 251 D-I teams
  • #351Pts Diff-468
  • #350TS%45.7%
  • #349eFG%42.6%
  • #341FTAR28.1%
  • #341Adj ORtg91.3
  • #339Opp 3P%38.7%
  • #338Opp eFG%54.5%
  • #3323P%30.1%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2015-16
Find Similar
  1. 1New Hampshire logoNew Hampshire logoNew Hampshire 2024-256-24America East88
  2. 2McNeese St. logoMcNeese St. logoMcNeese St. 2013-148-20Southland83
  3. 3VMI logoVMI logoVMI 2017-187-21Southern82
  4. 4Buffalo logoBuffalo logoBuffalo 2023-243-27MAC82
  5. 5Columbia logoColumbia logoColumbia 2022-235-22Ivy82
  6. 6Delaware St. logoDelaware St. logoDelaware St. 2018-194-25MEAC82
  7. 7USC Upstate logoUSC Upstate logoUSC Upstate 2018-193-26Big South81
  8. 8Manhattan logoManhattan logoManhattan 2023-246-23MAAC81
  9. 9Tennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech 2019-207-22OVC81
  10. 10Maryland Eastern Shore logoMaryland Eastern Shore logoMaryland Eastern Shore 2019-204-27MEAC79
Schedule
Loading the schedule
KWKieranWoodsSr
JBJoshuaBatsonJr
CVClemmye OwensVJrECElliottColeJr
QDQuronDavisJr
DFDevonFriendSr
TPTrayvonPalmerJrJAJawadAdekoyaSr
JMJordanMadrid-AndrewsJr
FJFred SimsJr.FrJDJaredDimakosSr
MBMontanaByrdSo
GHGentryHuntSo
Delundre Dixon headshotDelundreDixonFr
AEAnthonyEavesFr
K. WoodsSr6'2"-0.341––45.5%2428.0%968.53.92.624.0%56.3%
J. BatsonJr6'0"-0.532––31.0%811.5%102.12.01.520.0%50.0%
C. Owens VJr6'2"-0.629––45.3%2421.0%709.12.51.829.5%83.9%
E. ColeJr5'11"-0.628––51.2%4625.2%908.71.71.533.6%88.0%
Q. DavisJr6'10"-0.724––50.4%4213.8%203.53.40.50.0%56.4%
D. FriendSr6'6"-0.821––48.9%3515.3%293.43.00.20.0%42.3%
T. PalmerJr6'5"-0.819––48.0%3218.4%528.57.11.329.0%70.5%
J. AdekoyaSr6'6"-0.914––48.8%3421.2%717.02.40.532.9%69.2%
J. Madrid-AndrewsJr6'8"-1.011––52.7%5316.3%363.83.60.225.0%52.3%
F. Sims Jr.Fr6'4"-1.19––42.9%1928.7%9710.72.60.730.4%82.4%
J. DimakosSr6'6"–––0.0%23.9%20.00.00.00.0%0.0%
M. ByrdSo6'4"–––36.4%1117.8%472.31.50.222.6%84.6%
G. HuntSo6'3"–––50.0%4019.8%620.40.20.00.0%0.0%
D. DixonFr6'3"–––51.7%4812.2%132.11.30.720.0%72.7%
A. EavesFr6'2"–––47.8%3123.5%835.52.01.134.7%62.5%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo25-267-25#341-17.06101.112118.18-3.640-1924-126128.4%25-899045.3%132.1%2175.0%79
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo24-254-28#361-22.4192.81115.210-2.454-3141-282522.6%3+84044.4%030.6%870.5%33
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo23-2413-19#294-8.022101.523109.533-4.332-4130+14733.8%86-407148.0%1931.4%1471.2%41
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo22-2311-20#298-8.820104.546113.47-5.515+5360+226534.2%93+651050.5%4333.9%4672.8%64
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo21-227-25#344-19.2397.113116.42-2.150-11412-113831.5%78+681145.9%531.0%1565.4%4
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo19-204-25#353-34.6087.71122.30-3.736-1535-102122.6%8+172046.8%1332.0%2972.1%63
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo18-193-29#353-31.2089.11120.300.160-2501-190022.4%5+120245.0%229.9%367.6%18
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo17-183-29#348-25.0194.33119.310.766-2173-126126.5%26+292745.2%330.8%472.4%61
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo16-176-26#341-19.4392.53111.911-1.255-1559-90426.8%23+54543.9%131.1%770.1%52
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo15-161-28#347-19.3293.25112.59-2.241-11216-631031.0%62-125544.0%230.4%867.0%19
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo14-155-24#330-17.2589.21106.528-3.333-4828-302633.8%73-216143.3%330.1%866.7%26
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo13-1411-19#292-12.41398.415110.820-3.236-2820-34726.7%11-1229747.6%2433.7%4367.5%27

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
45.7%#350
Effective FG %
42.6%#349
3-Point %
30.1%#331
3PAR
38.9%#82
FTAR
28.1%#341
Assist %
47.9%#271

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
32.0%#258
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
27.1%#136
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

12 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.8% of shots at 0.62 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7148.8%0.62Middle (11–20s): 25.5% of shots at 1.22 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2925.5%1.22Late (21s+): 25.7% of shots at 0.96 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2225.7%0.96SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.862D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.621248.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.222425.5% of shots
Late 21s+0.96025.7% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 47.3% of shots at 0.89 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7247.3%0.89Middle (11–20s): 31.8% of shots at 1.37 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3031.8%1.37Late (21s+): 20.9% of shots at 1.37 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2320.9%1.37SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.141Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.89247.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.372031.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.37820.9% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.