Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logo

Chicago St.1-29

WACCoach: Lance Irvin

1-29NET#353
Schedule
LIndiana logoIndiana logoLNotre Dame logoNotre Dame logoLCentral Michigan logoCentral Michigan logoLIllinois St. logoIllinois St. logoLAkron logoAkron logoLEast Tennessee St. logoEast Tennessee St. logoLJackson St. logoJackson St. logoLBradley logoBradley logoWWEastern Illinois logoEastern Illinois logoWLDePaul logoDePaul logoLNorthwestern logoNorthwestern logoLWestern Illinois logoWestern Illinois logoLNorthern Illinois logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logo

Team Stats

30 games
  • Net Rating-44.21
  • Offensive Rating103.915
  • Defensive Rating148.15
  • Pace57.612
  • Effective FG%44.0%3
  • Off Rebound Pct22.4%7
  • Turnover Pct27.9%7
  • FT Attempt Rate33.1%48

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-44.21
  • Offensive Rating103.915
  • Defensive Rating148.15
  • Pace57.612
  • Effective FG%44.0%3
  • Off Rebound Pct22.4%7
  • Turnover Pct27.9%7
  • FT Attempt Rate33.1%48

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct3.3%1
  • Point Margin / Game-25.51
  • Points / Game59.91
  • Points Allowed / Game85.41
  • 1st Half Margin-14.60
  • 2nd Half Margin-10.90
  • Avg Largest Lead2.20
  • Avg Largest Deficit30.00

Box Score

  • Points / Game59.91
  • Rebounds / Game30.33
  • Assists / Game11.115
  • ORebs / Game7.89
  • DRebs / Game22.58
  • Steals / Game5.837
  • Blocks / Game2.08
  • Turnovers / Game16.13
  • PFs / Game19.812

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game21.64
  • FGAs / Game54.09
  • Field Goal Pct39.9%6
  • 2PMs / Game17.140
  • 2PAs / Game39.388
  • 2-Point Pct43.5%3
  • 3PMs / Game4.50
  • 3PAs / Game14.71
  • 3-Point Pct30.4%5
  • FTMs / Game12.329
  • FTAs / Game17.934
  • Free Throw Pct68.7%29

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s57.1%98
  • % Pts from 3s22.4%1
  • % Pts from FTs20.5%77
  • Paint Pts / Game15.519
  • % Pts in Paint25.9%34
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.525
  • % Pts on Fast Break5.8%36
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.116
  • % Pts off TOVs13.5%29
  • 1st Half Pts / Game26.61
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game33.36

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %48.4%3
  • Points / Shot1.114
  • 3-Point Att Rate27.2%0
  • Assist Pct51.3%44
  • Assists / 100 Poss19.231
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.69x3
  • PF Drawn / Game17.953

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%57.6%1
  • Opp True Shooting %60.4%1
  • Opp Field Goal Pct49.2%2
  • Opp 2-Point Pct57.7%1
  • Opp 3-Point Pct38.3%6
  • Opp 3PA Rate43.8%10
  • Opp FT Att Rate33.7%41
  • Opp Points / Shot1.393

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game85.41
  • Paint Pts Allowed20.557
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.721
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed14.711
  • Opp Assist Pct56.5%16
  • TOVs Forced / Game11.924

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct65.6%3
  • Turnovers Forced Pct20.6%61
  • Steal Pct10.1%60
  • Block Pct3.5%14
  • Hakeem Pct13.6%34
  • PF Efficiency1.11x15
  • Steals / PF0.29x19
  • Blocks / PF0.10x6

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 353 D-I teams
  • #122SOS1.6
  • #155Paint Pts %40.1%
  • #165FB Pts %9.5%
  • #183FTAR33.1%
  • #198AST%51.3%
  • #275Opp TOV%17.2%
  • #331OREB%22.4%
  • #333Opp 3P%38.3%
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #122SOS1.6
  • #155Paint Pts %40.1%
  • #165FB Pts %9.5%
  • #183FTAR33.1%
  • #198AST%51.3%
  • #275Opp TOV%17.2%
  • #331OREB%22.4%
  • #333Opp 3P%38.3%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #353Pts Diff-765
  • #353Adj DRtg119.7
  • #3523PM Diff-176
  • #352Opp eFG%57.6%
  • #351REB Diff-259
  • #350Adj ORtg89.0
  • #348eFG%44.0%
  • #347TS%47.9%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2018-19
Find Similar
  1. 1Florida A&M logoFlorida A&M logoFlorida A&M 2014-152-27MEAC81
  2. 2Mississippi Valley St. logoMississippi Valley St. logoMississippi Valley St. 2025-262-30SWAC78
  3. 3LIU logoLIU logoLIU 2022-231-26NEC76
  4. 4Central Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut 2019-203-27NEC74
  5. 5Lamar logoLamar logoLamar 2013-144-26Southland74
  6. 6Grambling St. logoGrambling St. logoGrambling St. 2014-150-27SWAC73
  7. 7Kennesaw St. logoKennesaw St. logoKennesaw St. 2019-201-28ASUN66
  8. 8Southern Utah logoSouthern Utah logoSouthern Utah 2013-141-27Big Sky66
  9. 9Idaho logoIdaho logoIdaho 2020-211-21Big Sky64
  10. 10Mississippi Valley St. logoMississippi Valley St. logoMississippi Valley St. 2018-195-26SWAC63
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Travon Bell headshotTravonBellSoChristian Jacob headshotChristianJacobJrAnthony Harris headshotAnthonyHarrisSrDelshon Strickland headshotDelshonStricklandSr
Patrick Szpir headshotPatrickSzpirJr
Rob Shaw headshotRobShawSrCameron Bowles headshotCameronBowlesSo
KOKenOdiaseSr
EWEugeneWitherspoonJr
NBNoahBigirumwamiSo
MOMilesOliverFr
JRJordanReedSo
MJMichaelJohnsonSo
T. BellSo6'3"-0.332––55.4%5716.9%429.33.41.336.0%77.3%
C. JacobJr6'8"-0.528––52.1%3924.7%8710.95.70.633.3%62.1%
A. HarrisSr6'5"-0.717––57.3%6523.6%8313.65.22.035.4%77.8%
D. StricklandSr6'4"-0.815––48.4%2519.3%597.52.60.728.0%70.3%
P. SzpirJr6'9"-1.010––46.9%2112.7%153.02.60.80.0%64.7%
R. ShawSr6'0"-1.71––40.6%1125.9%9110.33.24.917.0%62.7%
C. BowlesSo6'7"-2.20––49.0%2718.4%528.74.31.012.5%67.1%
K. OdiaseSr6'7"–––52.1%3920.6%682.71.80.233.3%60.0%
E. WitherspoonJr6'6"–––42.8%1315.3%301.81.90.114.3%45.5%
N. BigirumwamiSo6'10"–––48.1%2414.2%241.40.90.314.3%76.0%
M. OliverFr6'2"–––30.9%637.5%1002.51.50.00.0%71.4%
J. ReedSo6'0"–––67.7%929.7%71.80.40.552.9%100.0%
M. JohnsonSo6'1"–––29.5%612.9%160.70.60.416.7%55.6%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo25-267-25#341-17.06101.112118.18-3.640-1924-126128.4%25-899045.3%132.1%2175.0%79
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo24-254-28#361-22.4192.81115.210-2.454-3141-282522.6%3+84044.4%030.6%870.5%33
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo23-2413-19#294-8.022101.523109.533-4.332-4130+14733.8%86-407148.0%1931.4%1471.2%41
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo22-2311-20#298-8.820104.546113.47-5.515+5360+226534.2%93+651050.5%4333.9%4672.8%64
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo21-227-25#344-19.2397.113116.42-2.150-11412-113831.5%78+681145.9%531.0%1565.4%4
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo19-204-25#353-34.6087.71122.30-3.736-1535-102122.6%8+172046.8%1332.0%2972.1%63
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo18-193-29#353-31.2089.11120.300.160-2501-190022.4%5+120245.0%229.9%367.6%18
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo17-183-29#348-25.0194.33119.310.766-2173-126126.5%26+292745.2%330.8%472.4%61
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo16-176-26#341-19.4392.53111.911-1.255-1559-90426.8%23+54543.9%131.1%770.1%52
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo15-161-28#347-19.3293.25112.59-2.241-11216-631031.0%62-125544.0%230.4%867.0%19
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo14-155-24#330-17.2589.21106.528-3.333-4828-302633.8%73-216143.3%330.1%866.7%26
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo13-1411-19#292-12.41398.415110.820-3.236-2820-34726.7%11-1229747.6%2433.7%4367.5%27

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
47.9%#345
Effective FG %
44.0%#346
3-Point %
30.4%#334
3PAR
27.2%#352
FTAR
33.1%#182
Assist %
51.3%#195

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
40.8%#48
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
32.2%#310
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

16 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 40.7% of shots at 0.78 points per shot, against a D-I 0.8040.7%0.78Middle (11–20s): 32.5% of shots at 1.02 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2332.5%1.02Late (21s+): 26.7% of shots at 1.01 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1626.7%1.01SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.926D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.784640.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.02432.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.011326.7% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.5% of shots at 1.03 points per shot, against a D-I 0.8148.5%1.03Middle (11–20s): 29.4% of shots at 1.30 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2329.4%1.30Late (21s+): 22.1% of shots at 1.22 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1622.1%1.22SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.152Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s1.03348.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.302929.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.223022.1% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.