Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logo

Chicago St.5-24

WACCoach: Tracy Dildy

5-24NET#330
Schedule
LArizona St. logoArizona St. logoLCreighton logoCreighton logoWWLGeorgia St. logoGeorgia St. logoLOakland logoOakland logoLWestern Carolina logoWestern Carolina logoLNotre Dame logoNotre Dame logoLDePaul logoDePaul logoLToledo logoToledo logoLSouthern Illinois logoSouthern Illinois logoLWestern Kentucky logoWestern Kentucky logoWLSIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville logoWNebraska Omaha logoNebraska Omaha logoLGreen Bay logoGreen Bay logoLBowling Green logoBowling Green logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLSeattle logoSeattle logoWGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoWUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLSeattle logoSeattle logo

Team Stats

29 games
  • Net Rating-28.33
  • Offensive Rating127.489
  • Defensive Rating155.85
  • Pace43.35
  • Effective FG%42.3%2
  • Off Rebound Pct33.6%74
  • Turnover Pct34.4%3
  • FT Attempt Rate27.1%1

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-28.33
  • Offensive Rating127.489
  • Defensive Rating155.85
  • Pace43.35
  • Effective FG%42.3%2
  • Off Rebound Pct33.6%74
  • Turnover Pct34.4%3
  • FT Attempt Rate27.1%1

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct17.2%4
  • Point Margin / Game-12.33
  • Points / Game55.21
  • Points Allowed / Game67.548
  • 1st Half Margin-7.33
  • 2nd Half Margin-5.05
  • Avg Largest Lead––
  • Avg Largest Deficit––

Box Score

  • Points / Game55.21
  • Rebounds / Game32.125
  • Assists / Game8.83
  • ORebs / Game12.184
  • DRebs / Game19.93
  • Steals / Game7.793
  • Blocks / Game2.934
  • Turnovers / Game14.95
  • PFs / Game22.22

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game19.62
  • FGAs / Game53.544
  • Field Goal Pct36.7%1
  • 2PMs / Game13.63
  • 2PAs / Game33.427
  • 2-Point Pct40.6%2
  • 3PMs / Game6.141
  • 3PAs / Game20.176
  • 3-Point Pct30.2%10
  • FTMs / Game9.91
  • FTAs / Game14.51
  • Free Throw Pct68.4%40

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s49.1%36
  • % Pts from 3s33.0%82
  • % Pts from FTs18.0%14
  • Paint Pts / Game11.624
  • % Pts in Paint21.0%31
  • Fast Break Pts / Game1.719
  • % Pts on Fast Break3.1%24
  • Points off TOVs / Game6.921
  • % Pts off TOVs12.4%33
  • 1st Half Pts / Game26.02
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game29.11

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %46.1%2
  • Points / Shot1.031
  • 3-Point Att Rate37.6%76
  • Assist Pct45.0%7
  • Assists / 100 Poss20.443
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.59x2
  • PF Drawn / Game15.84

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%52.8%13
  • Opp True Shooting %57.5%7
  • Opp Field Goal Pct45.4%22
  • Opp 2-Point Pct50.0%27
  • Opp 3-Point Pct38.1%8
  • Opp 3PA Rate38.5%14
  • Opp FT Att Rate54.0%1
  • Opp Points / Shot1.421

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game67.548
  • Paint Pts Allowed12.870
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.445
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed10.542
  • Opp Assist Pct59.8%9
  • TOVs Forced / Game14.188

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct66.4%19
  • Turnovers Forced Pct32.6%96
  • Steal Pct17.7%98
  • Block Pct6.6%68
  • Hakeem Pct24.3%97
  • PF Efficiency1.40x0
  • Steals / PF0.35x61
  • Blocks / PF0.13x19

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams
  • #21Opp TOV%22.4%
  • #84Paint Pts %41.2%
  • #93OREB%33.6%
  • #172FB Pts %6.6%
  • #205SOS-1.9
  • #248REB Diff-58
  • #2503PM Diff-26
  • #254Adj DRtg106.1
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #21Opp TOV%22.4%
  • #84Paint Pts %41.2%
  • #93OREB%33.6%
  • #172FB Pts %6.6%
  • #205SOS-1.9
  • #248REB Diff-58
  • #2503PM Diff-26
  • #254Adj DRtg106.1
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #349FTAR27.1%
  • #346eFG%42.3%
  • #346TS%45.7%
  • #345Adj ORtg88.7
  • #344TOV%23.7%
  • #342Pts Diff-356
  • #328AST%45.0%
  • #326Opp 3P%38.1%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2014-15
Find Similar
  1. 1Florida Gulf Coast logoFlorida Gulf Coast logoFlorida Gulf Coast 2019-208-22ASUN80
  2. 2Tennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech 2019-207-22OVC77
  3. 3Austin Peay logoAustin Peay logoAustin Peay 2021-2210-17OVC77
  4. 4Arkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff logoArkansas Pine Bluff 2015-168-25SWAC72
  5. 5Georgia Southern logoGeorgia Southern logoGeorgia Southern 2020-219-13Sun Belt72
  6. 6Maryland Eastern Shore logoMaryland Eastern Shore logoMaryland Eastern Shore 2019-204-27MEAC71
  7. 7Western Carolina logoWestern Carolina logoWestern Carolina 2017-1811-19Southern71
  8. 8Navy logoNavy logoNavy 2013-148-21Patriot71
  9. 9Jackson St. logoJackson St. logoJackson St. 2017-1810-20SWAC69
  10. 10Delaware St. logoDelaware St. logoDelaware St. 2015-165-25MEAC68
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JGJohnnyGriffinSo
CRClarkeRosenbergSrJDJaredDimakosJrSHSeanHillSrTPTrayvonPalmerSoAGAnthonyGloverFrJMJoshuaMeierFr
RMRahjanMuhammadSr
QDQuronDavisSo
JBJoshuaBatsonJr
MJMichaelJohnsonSr
SMShariefMedlockFr
AWAaronWilliamsN/A
MBMontanaByrdFr
ERElijahRobertsonFrJAJawadAdekoyaJr
JTJesseTessmerJr
KKKurtKarisSo
J. GriffinSo6'5"-0.049––52.6%5112.3%153.63.90.37.7%52.3%
C. RosenbergSr6'4"-0.722––49.2%3528.1%9512.63.92.030.7%71.6%
J. DimakosJr6'5"-0.722––60.7%8418.9%556.13.10.636.6%78.9%
S. HillSr6'2"-0.720––44.6%2023.2%828.22.12.128.4%76.3%
T. PalmerSo6'4"-0.818––56.0%6819.2%587.74.80.741.2%65.3%
A. GloverFr5'10"-0.815––50.8%4320.1%646.81.41.233.7%67.6%
J. MeierFr6'8"-1.73––41.4%1420.4%665.04.00.6100.0%62.5%
R. MuhammadSr6'0"–––45.1%2129.5%973.41.20.233.3%71.4%
Q. DavisSo6'10"–––59.3%8014.0%222.62.70.20.0%37.5%
J. BatsonJr6'0"–––36.1%918.8%552.01.00.922.7%57.9%
M. JohnsonSr6'8"–––18.7%411.1%110.31.80.30.0%0.0%
S. MedlockFr6'3"––––0.0%10.80.30.00.0%0.0%
A. WilliamsN/A6'6"–––40.8%1314.5%261.81.80.16.3%100.0%
M. ByrdFr6'4"–––46.9%2618.6%533.31.20.330.6%75.0%
E. RobertsonFr6'5"–––46.1%2420.7%680.80.40.10.0%50.0%
J. AdekoyaJr6'6"–––42.3%1623.7%844.71.30.427.3%81.8%
J. TessmerJr6'8"–––38.2%1110.1%80.90.70.00.0%100.0%
K. KarisSo6'1"–––33.9%814.6%261.62.11.50.0%80.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo25-267-25#341-17.06101.112118.18-3.640-1924-126128.4%25-899045.3%132.1%2175.0%79
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo24-254-28#361-22.4192.81115.210-2.454-3141-282522.6%3+84044.4%030.6%870.5%33
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo23-2413-19#294-8.022101.523109.533-4.332-4130+14733.8%86-407148.0%1931.4%1471.2%41
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo22-2311-20#298-8.820104.546113.47-5.515+5360+226534.2%93+651050.5%4333.9%4672.8%64
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo21-227-25#344-19.2397.113116.42-2.150-11412-113831.5%78+681145.9%531.0%1565.4%4
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo19-204-25#353-34.6087.71122.30-3.736-1535-102122.6%8+172046.8%1332.0%2972.1%63
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo18-193-29#353-31.2089.11120.300.160-2501-190022.4%5+120245.0%229.9%367.6%18
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo17-183-29#348-25.0194.33119.310.766-2173-126126.5%26+292745.2%330.8%472.4%61
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo16-176-26#341-19.4392.53111.911-1.255-1559-90426.8%23+54543.9%131.1%770.1%52
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo15-161-28#347-19.3293.25112.59-2.241-11216-631031.0%62-125544.0%230.4%867.0%19
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo14-155-24#330-17.2589.21106.528-3.333-4828-302633.8%73-216143.3%330.1%866.7%26
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo13-1411-19#292-12.41398.415110.820-3.236-2820-34726.7%11-1229747.6%2433.7%4367.5%27

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
45.7%#346
Effective FG %
42.3%#345
3-Point %
30.2%#318
3PAR
37.6%#82
FTAR
27.1%#349
Assist %
45.0%#328

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
31.3%#257
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
28.8%#134
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

14 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 51.1% of shots at 0.62 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7151.1%0.62Middle (11–20s): 24.8% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2524.8%0.97Late (21s+): 24.1% of shots at 1.04 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1924.1%1.04SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.811D-I 0.96
Early 0–10s0.621051.1% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.97124.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.04824.1% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 47.7% of shots at 0.82 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7347.7%0.82Middle (11–20s): 29.9% of shots at 1.35 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2729.9%1.35Late (21s+): 22.3% of shots at 1.37 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2122.3%1.37SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.103Allowed, D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.821447.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.351829.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.37622.3% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 14-15. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 14-15. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.