Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logoChicago St. logo

Chicago St.11-19

WACCoach: Tracy Dildy

11-19NET#292
Schedule
LIndiana logoIndiana logoWWJacksonville St. logoJacksonville St. logoLBradley logoBradley logoLAlabama St. logoAlabama St. logoLIllinois logoIllinois logoWSouthern Illinois logoSouthern Illinois logoLIllinois St. logoIllinois St. logoWLDePaul logoDePaul logoWSIU Edwardsville logoSIU Edwardsville logoLCincinnati logoCincinnati logoLCreighton logoCreighton logoWIdaho logoIdaho logoLGreen Bay logoGreen Bay logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoWNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoWCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoWUMKC logoUMKC logoLUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logoLEastern Illinois logoEastern Illinois logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLIdaho logoIdaho logoWSeattle logoSeattle logoLCal St. Bakersfield logoCal St. Bakersfield logo

Team Stats

30 games
  • Net Rating-12.815
  • Offensive Rating109.320
  • Defensive Rating122.139
  • Pace63.072
  • Effective FG%46.8%20
  • Off Rebound Pct27.0%14
  • Turnover Pct19.2%69
  • FT Attempt Rate33.8%9

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-12.815
  • Offensive Rating109.320
  • Defensive Rating122.139
  • Pace63.072
  • Effective FG%46.8%20
  • Off Rebound Pct27.0%14
  • Turnover Pct19.2%69
  • FT Attempt Rate33.8%9

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct36.7%27
  • Point Margin / Game-8.011
  • Points / Game68.840
  • Points Allowed / Game76.911
  • 1st Half Margin-4.016
  • 2nd Half Margin-4.110
  • Avg Largest Lead––
  • Avg Largest Deficit––

Box Score

  • Points / Game68.840
  • Rebounds / Game31.313
  • Assists / Game11.121
  • ORebs / Game10.438
  • DRebs / Game20.97
  • Steals / Game8.498
  • Blocks / Game2.723
  • Turnovers / Game12.157
  • PFs / Game23.13

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.149
  • FGAs / Game59.089
  • Field Goal Pct40.9%11
  • 2PMs / Game17.236
  • 2PAs / Game38.162
  • 2-Point Pct45.1%13
  • 3PMs / Game7.073
  • 3PAs / Game20.983
  • 3-Point Pct33.3%40
  • FTMs / Game13.618
  • FTAs / Game19.919
  • Free Throw Pct68.2%31

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s49.9%40
  • % Pts from 3s30.4%76
  • % Pts from FTs19.8%14
  • Paint Pts / Game17.472
  • % Pts in Paint25.3%73
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.084
  • % Pts on Fast Break5.8%84
  • Points off TOVs / Game14.999
  • % Pts off TOVs21.7%100
  • 1st Half Pts / Game32.555
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game34.921

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %50.8%11
  • Points / Shot1.177
  • 3-Point Att Rate35.4%71
  • Assist Pct46.0%13
  • Assists / 100 Poss17.612
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.92x32
  • PF Drawn / Game18.531

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%52.5%16
  • Opp True Shooting %57.6%10
  • Opp Field Goal Pct46.0%23
  • Opp 2-Point Pct52.1%14
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.5%32
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.7%15
  • Opp FT Att Rate53.6%4
  • Opp Points / Shot1.425

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game76.911
  • Paint Pts Allowed18.621
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed3.137
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.911
  • Opp Assist Pct54.9%26
  • TOVs Forced / Game15.698

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct63.0%1
  • Turnovers Forced Pct24.8%85
  • Steal Pct13.4%89
  • Block Pct4.3%17
  • Hakeem Pct17.7%67
  • PF Efficiency1.25x2
  • Steals / PF0.36x79
  • Blocks / PF0.12x14

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 351 D-I teams
  • #13Opp TOV%22.2%
  • #48FB Pts %9.4%
  • #96TOV%17.3%
  • #99Paint Pts %41.1%
  • #1843PM Diff-2
  • #2133P%33.3%
  • #214SOS-1.9
  • #242Opp 3P%35.5%
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
  • #13Opp TOV%22.2%
  • #48FB Pts %9.4%
  • #96TOV%17.3%
  • #99Paint Pts %41.1%
  • #1843PM Diff-2
  • #2133P%33.3%
  • #214SOS-1.9
  • #242Opp 3P%35.5%
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
  • #350REB Diff-275
  • #346Opp OREB%37.0%
  • #320FTAR33.8%
  • #317Pts Diff-241
  • #307TS%50.3%
  • #305AST%46.0%
  • #302OREB%27.0%
  • #296Opp eFG%52.5%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2013-14
Find Similar
  1. 1USC Upstate logoUSC Upstate logoUSC Upstate 2023-247-20Big South88
  2. 2Fairleigh Dickinson logoFairleigh Dickinson logoFairleigh Dickinson 2014-157-21NEC87
  3. 3Louisiana Monroe logoLouisiana Monroe 2020-217-19Sun Belt87
  4. 4St. Francis NY logoSt. Francis NY 2017-1811-17NEC86
  5. 5Prairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M logoPrairie View A&M 2016-1711-20SWAC84
  6. 6Louisiana logoLouisiana logoLouisiana 2024-2511-21Sun Belt81
  7. 7Maryland Eastern Shore logoMaryland Eastern Shore logoMaryland Eastern Shore 2016-1712-20MEAC80
  8. 8Purdue Fort Wayne logoPurdue Fort Wayne logoPurdue Fort Wayne 2025-2614-15Horizon79
  9. 9Longwood logoLongwood logoLongwood 2014-159-23Big South79
  10. 10UMKC logoUMKC logoUMKC 2018-1910-21WAC79
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JDJamereDismukesSr
QPQuintonPippenSrMRMattRossSrCRClarkeRosenbergJr
RMRahjanMuhammadJr
CGCoreyGraySr
NDNateDuhonSrEDEddieDenardSr
MSMarkusStarksSr
AGArthurGageSr
JGJohnnyGriffinFr
JDJaredDimakosSo
QDQuronDavisFr
JBJoshuaBatsonSo
WRWillieRosenthalSo
KKKurtKarisFr
J. DismukesSr6'1"+0.263––48.6%3319.6%624.72.32.714.3%90.0%
Q. PippenSr6'4"+0.261––54.7%6425.3%8915.13.82.537.6%80.7%
M. RossSr6'8"+0.159––53.3%5618.9%5712.27.70.932.1%79.7%
C. RosenbergJr6'3"-0.436––54.2%6125.2%8913.93.82.635.2%74.5%
R. MuhammadJr6'0"-0.628––50.2%4014.1%245.82.51.032.4%76.9%
C. GraySr5'11"-0.723––49.9%3815.3%325.01.61.737.0%65.7%
N. DuhonSr6'3"-0.818––49.6%3722.2%789.23.31.224.4%71.3%
E. DenardSr6'6"-1.53––43.2%1920.7%696.23.40.60.0%45.9%
M. StarksSr6'5"–––34.5%109.5%70.70.90.0100.0%50.0%
A. GageSr6'10"––––20.0%650.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. GriffinFr6'5"–––51.5%4610.0%81.81.40.30.0%57.7%
J. DimakosSo6'5"–––48.5%3313.7%212.00.80.212.5%41.2%
Q. DavisFr6'9"–––0.0%219.5%610.00.40.00.0%0.0%
J. BatsonSo5'11"–––0.0%218.3%530.00.10.00.0%0.0%
W. RosenthalSo6'11"–––38.7%1320.8%701.51.00.00.0%50.0%
K. KarisFr6'1"–––38.7%1313.4%201.10.60.50.0%52.9%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo25-267-25#341-17.06101.112118.18-3.640-1924-126128.4%25-899045.3%132.1%2175.0%79
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo24-254-28#361-22.4192.81115.210-2.454-3141-282522.6%3+84044.4%030.6%870.5%33
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo23-2413-19#294-8.022101.523109.533-4.332-4130+14733.8%86-407148.0%1931.4%1471.2%41
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo22-2311-20#298-8.820104.546113.47-5.515+5360+226534.2%93+651050.5%4333.9%4672.8%64
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo21-227-25#344-19.2397.113116.42-2.150-11412-113831.5%78+681145.9%531.0%1565.4%4
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo19-204-25#353-34.6087.71122.30-3.736-1535-102122.6%8+172046.8%1332.0%2972.1%63
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo18-193-29#353-31.2089.11120.300.160-2501-190022.4%5+120245.0%229.9%367.6%18
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo17-183-29#348-25.0194.33119.310.766-2173-126126.5%26+292745.2%330.8%472.4%61
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo16-176-26#341-19.4392.53111.911-1.255-1559-90426.8%23+54543.9%131.1%770.1%52
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo15-161-28#347-19.3293.25112.59-2.241-11216-631031.0%62-125544.0%230.4%867.0%19
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo14-155-24#330-17.2589.21106.528-3.333-4828-302633.8%73-216143.3%330.1%866.7%26
Chicago St. logoChicago St. logo13-1411-19#292-12.41398.415110.820-3.236-2820-34726.7%11-1229747.6%2433.7%4367.5%27

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
50.3%#304
Effective FG %
46.8%#280
3-Point %
33.3%#209
3PAR
35.4%#101
FTAR
33.8%#319
Assist %
46.0%#303

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
37.0%#140
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
25.5%#70
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

12 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 52.0% of shots at 0.73 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7152.0%0.73Middle (11–20s): 26.9% of shots at 1.33 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2626.9%1.33Late (21s+): 21.1% of shots at 1.14 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2121.1%1.14SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9746D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.735352.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.337126.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.142421.1% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.3% of shots at 0.77 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7350.3%0.77Middle (11–20s): 29.6% of shots at 1.35 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2729.6%1.35Late (21s+): 20.0% of shots at 1.20 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2320.0%1.20SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0328Allowed, D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.772850.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.351929.6% of shots
Late 21s+1.205820.0% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 350 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 13-14. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 13-14. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.