Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Ivy
Columbia logo

Columbia

10-18NET#213Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #263Coach: Jim Engles
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LMarist logoLYoungstown St. logoLFIU logoLFordham logoWSJLDelaware logoLColgate logoWBryant logoWIona logoLBoston College logoLRutgers logoLNorthwestern logoWBinghamton logoWELLCornell logoWCornell logoLPrinceton logoLPenn logoLHarvard logoLDartmouth logoLYale logoLBrown logoWPenn logoLPrinceton logoWBrown logoWYale logoWDartmouth logoLHarvard logo

Team Stats

28 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating0.442
  • Offensive Rating103.711
  • Defensive Rating103.380
  • Pace70.993
  • Effective FG%52.1%65
  • Off Rebound Pct24.4%18
  • Turnover Pct18.4%75
  • FT Attempt Rate21.9%1

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct35.7%21
  • Point Margin / Game0.342
  • Points / Game73.559
  • Points Allowed / Game73.336
  • 1st Half Margin0.548
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.242
  • Avg Largest Lead10.946
  • Avg Largest Deficit9.660

Box Score

  • Points / Game73.559
  • Rebounds / Game35.247
  • Assists / Game15.893
  • ORebs / Game9.130
  • DRebs / Game26.170
  • Steals / Game7.891
  • Blocks / Game2.832
  • Turnovers / Game13.048
  • PFs / Game19.316

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game27.887
  • FGAs / Game61.588
  • Field Goal Pct45.2%64
  • 2PMs / Game19.377
  • 2PAs / Game38.177
  • 2-Point Pct50.8%52
  • 3PMs / Game8.573
  • 3PAs / Game23.464
  • 3-Point Pct36.2%75
  • FTMs / Game9.53
  • FTAs / Game13.52
  • Free Throw Pct70.6%51

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s52.5%77
  • % Pts from 3s34.5%69
  • % Pts from FTs12.9%1
  • Paint Pts / Game26.586
  • % Pts in Paint36.0%83
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.642
  • % Pts on Fast Break6.2%39
  • Points off TOVs / Game14.891
  • % Pts off TOVs20.1%90
  • 1st Half Pts / Game34.356
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game36.631

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.6%49
  • Points / Shot1.2020
  • 3-Point Att Rate38.1%48
  • Assist Pct56.9%84
  • Assists / 100 Poss22.370
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.21x79
  • PF Drawn / Game15.79

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%52.2%31
  • Opp True Shooting %56.3%26
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.8%41
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.1%40
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.8%27
  • Opp 3PA Rate40.9%26
  • Opp FT Att Rate38.2%16
  • Opp Points / Shot1.3218

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game73.336
  • Paint Pts Allowed23.436
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed5.342
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed14.216
  • Opp Assist Pct47.2%83
  • TOVs Forced / Game13.567

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct72.9%64
  • Turnovers Forced Pct19.1%39
  • Steal Pct11.0%71
  • Block Pct3.9%21
  • Hakeem Pct14.9%47
  • PF Efficiency1.32x3
  • Steals / PF0.40x75
  • Blocks / PF0.14x21

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 114 D-I teams
  • #46PO TOV Diff+25
  • #57AST%56.9%
  • #90Paint Pts %42.7%
  • #90Opp OREB%26.0%
  • #913P%36.2%
  • #118Opp TOV%19.8%
  • #127eFG%52.1%
  • #160TOV%18.4%
Where they rank worstof 114 D-I teams
  • #352FTAR21.9%
  • #267OREB%25.7%
  • #259Opp 3P%35.6%
  • #230FB Pts %7.7%
  • #221Adj ORtg102.9
  • #215Opp eFG%51.2%
  • #214REB Diff-10
  • #214Adj DRtg106.6
Game Log
Loading game log…
M. SmithJr5'11"+1.58847.1%2129.0%9615.82.55.025.0%85.3%
P. TapeJr6'10"+1.48566.5%9023.8%8411.35.91.4100.0%67.1%
J. KillingsworthJr6'5"+0.86453.3%4612.5%146.13.21.938.3%50.0%
G. StefaniniSo6'3"+0.55150.9%3426.6%9313.85.34.139.1%78.7%
Q. AdleshSr6'0"+0.54752.1%4022.8%8013.52.62.536.7%68.2%
M. EllisFr6'5"+0.54767.1%9116.1%365.62.21.042.5%100.0%
R. BrumantSo6'7"+0.44456.0%6016.0%356.24.80.824.4%66.7%
P. BarbaSr6'5"67.5%929.0%62.81.50.944.1%100.0%
R. HunterSr6'5"42.8%1312.5%141.92.81.214.3%22.2%
CJ DavisSr6'2"66.5%9019.2%581.80.70.525.0%100.0%
T. BibbsSo6'3"44.1%1515.6%323.61.40.624.5%52.4%
I. NwekeFr6'7"52.2%4024.3%865.33.60.30.0%59.3%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Columbia logo25-2616-12#1670.254110.256110.149-3.243+24298+226637.5%97+83454.3%8135.6%7668.9%18
Columbia logo24-2512-15#264-7.328107.448114.712-5.028+1045-421227.4%27-296853.3%7733.7%4773.5%66
Columbia logo23-2413-14#204-3.143108.160111.222-4.034+6269+55229.5%53-65054.1%8737.5%9573.2%68
Columbia logo22-237-22#332-13.5999.015112.511-1.356-1475+165927.0%32+223046.8%731.7%1571.5%48
Columbia logo21-224-22#350-19.9295.39115.33-3.838-3828-62527.3%39+86349.0%2935.6%8062.7%1
Columbia logo19-206-24#300-10.51595.914106.524-2.047-1278-342220.4%2-64946.5%1030.1%973.0%70
Columbia logo18-1910-18#213-3.840102.937106.640-2.441-1039+65125.7%24-296652.1%6536.2%7570.6%51
Columbia logo17-188-19#226-4.936107.761112.612-2.245-382705227.6%35-166152.2%6436.7%7574.0%79
Columbia logo16-1711-16#229-5.234101.936107.234-2.738-6123-401727.9%34-397450.2%4236.1%6570.8%57
Columbia logo15-1623-10#1056.270111.485105.346-1.944+8973+749230.3%53-718653.7%9037.6%8871.9%71
Columbia logo14-1512-15#1432.459108.381105.9330.162+6673+1059932.5%64+392152.2%8136.4%7771.6%74
Columbia logo13-1420-13#1045.671108.667103.067-1.349+9674+1139828.3%18+511953.0%8738.7%9277.5%99

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.2%#172
Effective FG %
52.1%#122
3-Point %
36.2%#87
3PAR
38.1%#181
FTAR
21.9%#352
Assist %
56.9%#56

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.4%#209
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
25.9%#178
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

21 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 42.9% of shots at 0.77 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0942.9%0.77Middle (11–20s): 34.1% of shots at 1.26 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0434.1%1.26Late (21s+): 23.0% of shots at 1.24 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9723.0%1.24SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 43.7% of shots at 0.76 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0743.7%0.76Middle (11–20s): 31.6% of shots at 1.24 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0231.6%1.24Late (21s+): 24.7% of shots at 1.15 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9524.7%1.15SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

21 games
Created byFinished by
Gabe Stefanini → Patrick Tape: 25 assisted baskets (24 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Gabe Stefanini → Quinton Adlesh: 24 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 19 from three)Gabe Stefanini → Jake Killingsworth: 10 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 7 from three)Jake Killingsworth → Patrick Tape: 14 assisted baskets (13 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Jake Killingsworth → Quinton Adlesh: 12 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Jake Killingsworth → Gabe Stefanini: 8 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 5 from three)Quinton Adlesh → Patrick Tape: 12 assisted baskets (11 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Quinton Adlesh → Gabe Stefanini: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Quinton Adlesh → Jake Killingsworth: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Quinton Adlesh → Maka Ellis: 9 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Mike Smith → Gabe Stefanini: 11 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 11 from three)Mike Smith → Jake Killingsworth: 7 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 4 from three)Mike Smith → Ike Nweke: 6 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Patrick Tape → Quinton Adlesh: 9 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Stefanini59 astKillingsworth34 astAdlesh33 astSmith24 astTapeTape51 madeAdlesh45 madeStefanini25 madeKillingsworth23 madeEllisNweke
Stefanini is the least-assisted finisher — 81% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.