Schedule
L
L
L
L
WL
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
WL
WL
L
L
L
L
L
WLWWWL
LLLWLLWWLLLWWLWLLLLLLWLWWWLTeam Stats
26 games- Net Rating-4.334
- Offensive Rating101.89
- Defensive Rating106.171
- Pace70.793
- Effective FG%51.5%63
- Off Rebound Pct24.4%18
- Turnover Pct18.2%76
- FT Attempt Rate22.3%1
Team Stats
26 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-4.334
- Offensive Rating101.89
- Defensive Rating106.171
- Pace70.793
- Effective FG%51.5%63
- Off Rebound Pct24.4%18
- Turnover Pct18.2%76
- FT Attempt Rate22.3%1
Results & Margin
- Win Pct30.8%16
- Point Margin / Game-3.032
- Points / Game72.055
- Points Allowed / Game75.029
- 1st Half Margin-1.634
- 2nd Half Margin-1.435
- Avg Largest Lead8.227
- Avg Largest Deficit10.353
Box Score
- Points / Game72.055
- Rebounds / Game34.035
- Assists / Game14.987
- ORebs / Game8.725
- DRebs / Game25.459
- Steals / Game7.488
- Blocks / Game2.629
- Turnovers / Game12.951
- PFs / Game19.221
Shooting
- FGMs / Game27.385
- FGAs / Game60.888
- Field Goal Pct45.0%69
- 2PMs / Game19.586
- 2PAs / Game38.583
- 2-Point Pct50.5%54
- 3PMs / Game7.958
- 3PAs / Game22.351
- 3-Point Pct35.4%67
- FTMs / Game9.43
- FTAs / Game13.62
- Free Throw Pct69.4%38
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s54.1%85
- % Pts from 3s32.9%59
- % Pts from FTs13.1%1
- Paint Pts / Game26.186
- % Pts in Paint36.2%86
- Fast Break Pts / Game3.830
- % Pts on Fast Break5.2%26
- Points off TOVs / Game13.685
- % Pts off TOVs18.9%84
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.841
- 2nd Half Pts / Game36.332
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %53.9%43
- Points / Shot1.1817
- 3-Point Att Rate36.6%34
- Assist Pct54.4%71
- Assists / 100 Poss21.160
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.16x77
- PF Drawn / Game15.79
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%52.2%31
- Opp True Shooting %56.3%26
- Opp Field Goal Pct44.8%41
- Opp 2-Point Pct51.1%40
- Opp 3-Point Pct35.8%27
- Opp 3PA Rate40.9%26
- Opp FT Att Rate38.2%16
- Opp Points / Shot1.3218
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game75.029
- Paint Pts Allowed23.436
- Fast Break Pts Allowed5.342
- Pts off TOVs Allowed14.216
- Opp Assist Pct47.2%83
- TOVs Forced / Game13.567
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.9%64
- Turnovers Forced Pct19.1%39
- Steal Pct10.4%66
- Block Pct3.6%17
- Hakeem Pct14.1%41
- PF Efficiency1.23x4
- Steals / PF0.38x71
- Blocks / PF0.13x19
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 119 D-I teams- #55PO TOV Diff-16
- #66Paint Pts %43.7%
- #105AST%54.4%
- #1163P%35.4%
- #125Opp OREB%27.1%
- #131eFG%51.5%
- #143TOV%18.2%
- #150Opp TOV%19.0%
Where they rank bestof 119 D-I teams
- #55PO TOV Diff-16
- #66Paint Pts %43.7%
- #105AST%54.4%
- #1163P%35.4%
- #125Opp OREB%27.1%
- #131eFG%51.5%
- #143TOV%18.2%
- #150Opp TOV%19.0%
Where they rank worstof 119 D-I teams
- #351FTAR22.3%
- #292OREB%24.4%
- #257Opp 3P%35.8%
- #257FB Pts %6.6%
- #245Opp eFG%52.2%
- #236REB Diff-57
- #227Pts Diff-79
- #224Adj ORtg102.3
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1
Georgia TechGa. Tech 2021-2211-20ACCMost alike in Opp TOV%, 3PA rate, Adj O85 - 2
Illinois St. 2018-1917-16MVCMost alike in Adj O, Tempo, TOV%85 - 3Colgate 2025-2616-15PatriotMost alike in Opp OREB%, OREB%, Tempo84
- 4
Maine 2022-2311-17America EastMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj D, eFG%84 - 5Harvard 2024-2511-15IvyMost alike in Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%, Adj D84
- 6
Richmond 2017-1812-20A10Most alike in Tempo, eFG%, 3PA rate83 - 7
Evansville 2023-2416-18MVCMost alike in 3PA rate, TOV%, Opp TOV%82 - 8
Lehigh 2015-1616-15PatriotMost alike in Adj D, Opp TOV%, Tempo82 - 9
UNC GreensboroUNCG 2014-158-22SouthernMost alike in Opp OREB%, Opp eFG%, eFG%81 - 10
Long Beach St.LBSU 2025-268-22Big WestMost alike in OREB%, Adj D, Opp eFG%81
Schedule
Loading the schedule
MSMikeSmithJr
PatrickTapeJr
JakeKillingsworthJrMEMakaEllisFr
GabeStefaniniSo
RandyBrumantSo
QuintonAdleshSr
TaiBibbsSo
IkeNwekeFr
PatrickTapeJrJakeKillingsworthJrMEMakaEllisFrGabeStefaniniSoRandyBrumantSoQuintonAdleshSrPBPeterBarbaSr
RHRodneyHunterSr
CDCJDavisSr
TaiBibbsSoIkeNwekeFr| M. SmithMike Smith | Jr | 5'11" | +1.082 | – | – | 47.1%21 | 29.0%96 | 15.8 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 25.0% | 85.3% |
| P. TapePatrick Tape | Jr | 6'10" | +0.981 | – | – | 66.5%90 | 23.8%84 | 11.3 | 5.9 | 1.4 | 100.0% | 67.1% |
| J. KillingsworthJake Killingsworth | Jr | 6'5" | +0.361 | – | – | 53.3%46 | 12.5%14 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 38.3% | 50.0% |
| M. EllisMaka Ellis | Fr | 6'5" | +0.153 | – | – | 67.1%91 | 16.1%36 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 42.5% | 100.0% |
| G. StefaniniGabe Stefanini | So | 6'3" | +0.047 | – | – | 50.9%34 | 26.6%93 | 13.8 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 39.1% | 78.7% |
| R. BrumantRandy Brumant | So | 6'7" | -0.143 | – | – | 56.0%60 | 16.0%35 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 24.4% | 66.7% |
| Q. AdleshQuinton Adlesh | Sr | 6'0" | -0.240 | – | – | 52.1%40 | 22.8%80 | 13.5 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 36.7% | 68.2% |
| P. BarbaPeter Barba | Sr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 67.5%92 | 9.0%6 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 44.1% | 100.0% |
| R. HunterRodney Hunter | Sr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 42.8%13 | 12.5%14 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 14.3% | 22.2% |
| CJ Davis | Sr | 6'2" | – | – | – | 66.5%90 | 19.2%58 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| T. BibbsTai Bibbs | So | 6'3" | – | – | – | 44.1%15 | 15.6%32 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 24.5% | 52.4% |
| I. NwekeIke Nweke | Fr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 52.2%40 | 24.3%86 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 59.3% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 16-12 | #178 | 0.254 | 110.256 | 110.149 | -3.243 | +24298 | +2266 | 37.5%97 | +834 | 54.3%81 | 35.6%76 | 68.9%18 |
| 24-25 | 12-15 | #272 | -7.328 | 107.448 | 114.712 | -5.028 | +1045 | -4212 | 27.4%27 | -2968 | 53.3%77 | 33.7%47 | 73.5%66 |
| 23-24 | 13-14 | #229 | -3.143 | 108.160 | 111.222 | -4.034 | +6269 | +552 | 29.5%53 | -650 | 54.1%87 | 37.5%95 | 73.2%68 |
| 22-23 | 7-22 | #344 | -13.59 | 99.015 | 112.511 | -1.356 | -1475 | +1659 | 27.0%32 | +2230 | 46.8%7 | 31.7%15 | 71.5%48 |
| 21-22 | 4-22 | #348 | -19.92 | 95.39 | 115.33 | -3.838 | -3828 | -625 | 27.3%39 | +863 | 49.0%29 | 35.6%80 | 62.7%1 |
| 19-20 | 6-24 | #298 | -10.515 | 95.914 | 106.524 | -2.047 | -1278 | -3422 | 20.4%2 | -649 | 46.5%10 | 30.1%9 | 73.0%70 |
| 18-19 | 10-18 | #213 | -3.840 | 102.937 | 106.640 | -2.441 | -1039 | +651 | 25.7%24 | -2966 | 52.1%65 | 36.2%75 | 70.6%51 |
| 17-18 | 8-19 | #219 | -4.936 | 107.761 | 112.612 | -2.245 | -3827 | 052 | 27.6%35 | -1661 | 52.2%64 | 36.7%75 | 74.0%79 |
| 16-17 | 11-16 | #230 | -5.234 | 101.936 | 107.234 | -2.738 | -6123 | -4017 | 27.9%34 | -3974 | 50.2%42 | 36.1%65 | 70.8%57 |
| 15-16 | 23-10 | #106 | 6.270 | 111.485 | 105.346 | -1.944 | +8973 | +7492 | 30.3%53 | -7186 | 53.7%90 | 37.6%88 | 71.9%71 |
| 14-15 | 12-15 | #151 | 2.459 | 108.381 | 105.933 | 0.162 | +6673 | +10599 | 32.5%64 | +3921 | 52.2%81 | 36.4%77 | 71.6%74 |
| 13-14 | 20-13 | #104 | 5.671 | 108.667 | 103.067 | -1.349 | +9674 | +11398 | 28.3%18 | +5119 | 53.0%87 | 38.7%92 | 77.5%99 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
53.6%#184
Effective FG %
51.5%#130
3-Point %
35.4%#115
3PAR
36.6%#229
FTAR
22.3%#351
Assist %
54.4%#101
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.7%#192
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
27.1%#213
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
19 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0358D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.742840.2% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.235235.6% of shots
Late 21s+1.226624.2% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0340Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.785643.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.244931.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.204025.4% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.