Schedule
WL
W
W
L
W
L
WW
WW
WL
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
LW
LLLWLWWL
WWLWLWWWWWLLLWWWWWWWWLLWLLLWLWWLTeam Stats
30 games- Net Rating-1.744
- Offensive Rating102.221
- Defensive Rating103.971
- Pace69.673
- Effective FG%47.1%12
- Off Rebound Pct31.6%76
- Turnover Pct20.1%39
- FT Attempt Rate36.3%57
Team Stats
30 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-1.744
- Offensive Rating102.221
- Defensive Rating103.971
- Pace69.673
- Effective FG%47.1%12
- Off Rebound Pct31.6%76
- Turnover Pct20.1%39
- FT Attempt Rate36.3%57
Results & Margin
- Win Pct56.7%65
- Point Margin / Game-1.244
- Points / Game71.141
- Points Allowed / Game72.352
- 1st Half Margin-0.746
- 2nd Half Margin-0.546
- Avg Largest Lead9.441
- Avg Largest Deficit10.750
Box Score
- Points / Game71.141
- Rebounds / Game36.771
- Assists / Game13.965
- ORebs / Game12.084
- DRebs / Game24.847
- Steals / Game6.770
- Blocks / Game2.730
- Turnovers / Game14.024
- PFs / Game22.52
Shooting
- FGMs / Game25.144
- FGAs / Game59.880
- Field Goal Pct42.1%22
- 2PMs / Game19.173
- 2PAs / Game40.181
- 2-Point Pct47.7%30
- 3PMs / Game6.016
- 3PAs / Game19.735
- 3-Point Pct30.5%5
- FTMs / Game14.962
- FTAs / Game21.766
- Free Throw Pct68.5%33
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s53.8%81
- % Pts from 3s25.3%16
- % Pts from FTs20.9%67
- Paint Pts / Game21.358
- % Pts in Paint29.9%59
- Fast Break Pts / Game4.062
- % Pts on Fast Break5.7%64
- Points off TOVs / Game12.970
- % Pts off TOVs18.2%73
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.634
- 2nd Half Pts / Game38.356
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %51.3%14
- Points / Shot1.1918
- 3-Point Att Rate32.9%27
- Assist Pct55.4%70
- Assists / 100 Poss20.049
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.00x49
- PF Drawn / Game20.789
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%50.0%58
- Opp True Shooting %55.7%38
- Opp Field Goal Pct43.8%55
- Opp 2-Point Pct48.8%58
- Opp 3-Point Pct34.7%56
- Opp 3PA Rate35.5%58
- Opp FT Att Rate48.2%3
- Opp Points / Shot1.3512
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game72.352
- Paint Pts Allowed18.757
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.138
- Pts off TOVs Allowed11.750
- Opp Assist Pct52.7%45
- TOVs Forced / Game16.097
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.6%74
- Turnovers Forced Pct23.0%86
- Steal Pct9.6%61
- Block Pct3.9%24
- Hakeem Pct13.6%41
- PF Efficiency1.08x22
- Steals / PF0.30x40
- Blocks / PF0.12x15
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 350 D-I teams- #16Opp TOV%22.4%
- #88OREB%31.6%
- #94Opp OREB%27.4%
- #99Paint Pts %41.7%
- #104AST%55.4%
- #105FB Pts %8.4%
- #115REB Diff+46
- #149Opp eFG%50.0%
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
- #16Opp TOV%22.4%
- #88OREB%31.6%
- #94Opp OREB%27.4%
- #99Paint Pts %41.7%
- #104AST%55.4%
- #105FB Pts %8.4%
- #115REB Diff+46
- #149Opp eFG%50.0%
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
- #3313P%30.5%
- #306eFG%47.1%
- #306SOS-5.3
- #302TS%50.8%
- #300Adj ORtg97.1
- #2343PM Diff-18
- #232TOV%19.4%
- #197Pts Diff-36
Most Similar Seasons
to 2016-17- 1
Prairie View A&MPVAMU 2022-2311-19SWACMost alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, Adj D87 - 2
Portland St. 2024-2516-13Big SkyMost alike in FT rate, TOV%, Opp eFG%85 - 3Southern 2024-2517-12SWACMost alike in eFG%, Opp TOV%, Adj D83
- 4
Lindenwood 2024-2513-17OVCMost alike in Tempo, TOV%, Opp eFG%83 - 5
Detroit MercyDetroit 2013-1411-19HorizonMost alike in Adj D, Tempo, eFG%83 - 6
Longwood 2025-2613-16Big SouthMost alike in Tempo, 3PA rate, Opp TOV%83 - 7
UC Davis 2020-219-8Big WestMost alike in Tempo, Adj D, Opp TOV%81 - 8Portland St. 2023-2414-15Big SkyMost alike in Tempo, Adj D, FT rate81
- 9North Texas 2014-1512-17C-USAMost alike in TOV%, Adj O, 3PA rate81
- 10
Tennessee St.Tenn. St. 2021-2212-18OVCMost alike in FT rate, OREB%, Opp eFG%81
Schedule
Loading the schedule
| T. ButlerTorry Butler | Sr | 6'6" | +0.567 | – | – | 54.0%50 | 18.1%50 | 6.9 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 22.2% | 61.7% |
| A. MajauskasAurimas Majauskas | Sr | 6'8" | -0.240 | – | – | 63.1%87 | 21.2%72 | 9.1 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 44.4% | 66.1% |
| J. WilliamsJamal Williams | Jr | 6'5" | -0.433 | – | – | 51.2%36 | 15.9%35 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 27.3% | 67.4% |
| J. SpiveyJovante' Spivey | Sr | 6'0" | -0.432 | – | – | 52.7%43 | 18.2%51 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 25.7% | 76.2% |
| P. BaxterPaul Baxter | Sr | 6'2" | -0.432 | – | – | 48.3%25 | 16.4%38 | 7.3 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 21.1% | 67.3% |
| J. Dewey IIIJohn Dewey III | So | 6'0" | -0.430 | – | – | 52.5%42 | 22.3%78 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 35.8% | 73.4% |
| C. Galbreath Jr.Christopher Galbreath Jr. | Jr | 6'7" | -0.624 | – | – | 51.4%37 | 27.4%94 | 10.1 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 18.2% | 70.0% |
| D. HendersonDakarai Henderson | Sr | 6'3" | -1.53 | – | – | 46.6%21 | 21.2%72 | 10.7 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 29.1% | 57.4% |
| P. Jones Jr.Phillip Jones Jr. | Sr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 56.0%60 | 25.7%91 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| J. Lopez Jr.Jesse Lopez Jr. | Jr | 6'7" | – | – | – | – | 4.1%2 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| J. DelaneyJosh Delaney | So | 6'0" | – | – | – | 56.8%64 | 17.6%46 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 36.4% | 60.0% |
| A. AlmanzaAlbert Almanza | So | 6'6" | – | – | – | 58.1%70 | 13.6%20 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 39.0% | 71.4% |
| C. DelaneyCameron Delaney | So | 6'4" | – | – | – | 68.0%93 | 19.3%59 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 23.3% | 85.7% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 22-12 | #109 | 4.068 | 113.373 | 109.354 | -2.452 | +22094 | +850 | 37.4%96 | +1240 | 53.1%68 | 36.6%90 | 71.7%41 |
| 24-25 | 13-19 | #193 | -3.840 | 109.362 | 113.218 | -0.564 | +1346 | -841 | 31.1%57 | +1336 | 52.0%62 | 38.8%98 | 72.5%55 |
| 23-24 | 21-12 | #156 | -0.553 | 103.735 | 104.167 | -2.944 | +12283 | +1557 | 32.5%78 | -1052 | 48.8%26 | 35.2%69 | 72.4%57 |
| 22-23 | 26-8 | #71 | 11.885 | 106.860 | 95.196 | -1.256 | +21097 | +1556 | 33.7%89 | -11894 | 52.7%77 | 37.9%95 | 67.7%14 |
| 21-22 | 19-14 | #154 | -0.252 | 100.832 | 101.069 | -3.341 | +10678 | +5384 | 31.5%77 | -6882 | 49.9%42 | 34.3%58 | 60.5%0 |
| 19-20 | 18-13 | #203 | -3.739 | 99.833 | 103.644 | -7.77 | -2438 | +250 | 28.7%53 | -12997 | 51.2%67 | 34.2%64 | 74.1%78 |
| 18-19 | 21-12 | #170 | -1.447 | 105.252 | 106.639 | -6.99 | +6066 | +6689 | 31.0%73 | -8689 | 51.9%62 | 36.7%82 | 75.3%92 |
| 17-18 | 21-15 | #202 | -4.836 | 101.224 | 106.051 | -5.015 | +14184 | -2038 | 32.9%83 | -4575 | 48.6%17 | 33.7%31 | 71.5%54 |
| 16-17 | 21-13 | #240 | -5.533 | 98.518 | 104.054 | -6.99 | +10777 | -2132 | 31.6%73 | -8991 | 48.9%28 | 31.6%8 | 68.6%35 |
| 15-16 | 15-15 | #204 | -3.143 | 103.648 | 106.736 | -6.610 | +10378 | +957 | 29.9%50 | -5579 | 50.1%49 | 34.1%43 | 69.8%52 |
| 14-15 | 22-9 | #77 | 9.480 | 105.767 | 96.385 | -6.47 | +25997 | +9596 | 36.4%92 | -4574 | 49.6%55 | 32.9%32 | 70.6%66 |
| 13-14 | 22-11 | #192 | -1.446 | 107.260 | 108.632 | -7.66 | +6565 | +6389 | 34.6%79 | -4675 | 52.8%86 | 39.2%95 | 66.8%21 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
50.8%#300
Effective FG %
47.1%#306
3-Point %
30.5%#331
3PAR
32.9%#254
FTAR
36.3%#149
Assist %
55.4%#103
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
35.3%#163
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
29.8%#202
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
11 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9316D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.683052.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.232526.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.183121.1% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9961Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.658051.4% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.57125.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.138623.2% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.