Winthrop14-15

Big SouthCoach: Mark Prosser

14-15NET#163

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kasen Harrison	875	226	79.5%	−0.848	−2.240	−1.356	−0.942	−6.28	−3.388	−4.826	−0.656	−0.248	+1.776	+8.610
Kelton Talford	772	329	70.1%	−12.714	+7.484	+20.10	+3.886	−1.934	−3.488	+9.892	+12.20	−3.124	+0.966	+12.74
Nick Johnson	725	376	65.9%	−1.246	−2.736	−1.658	−5.310	+0.354	−2.684	−0.350	+3.120	+2.876	+3.794	+6.020
Chase Claxton	484	617	44.0%	+4.266	−2.936	−7.182	+1.262	+0.152	+5.32	+17.5100	−2.876	−7.26	+3.894	−18.098
Alex Timmerman	446	655	40.5%	+8.680	−4.130	−12.694	−4.016	+4.586	+2.318	−11.06	−10.398	+0.052	−2.814	−7.786
Sin'Cere McMahon	424	677	38.5%	−16.78	−5.722	+11.16	−0.942	−4.716	−0.860	−13.54	+2.922	+1.060	−4.06	+2.934
Micheal Anumba	386	715	35.1%	+1.456	+4.774	+3.332	+4.590	−2.034	−0.250	+6.284	+3.616	+0.052	+2.282	+6.020
Yoro Diallo	145	956	13.1%	+18.596	−0.150	−18.698	−0.150	+8.798	+3.510	−1.942	−11.898	+11.4100	−7.72	−7.284
Xavier McKelvy	109	992	9.9%	+11.486	−3.732	−15.296	−2.526	−5.014	−1.368	+1.360	−8.998	−0.150	−4.74	−16.598

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kasen Harrison	875	226	79.5%	3.754	113.060	109.344	53.2%60	32.3%56	17.0%46	43.3%80	50.6%48	68.7%48	17.1%50	36.4%28
Kelton Talford	772	329	70.1%	-0.446	115.666	116.128	54.5%66	33.0%58	16.7%48	47.2%84	54.9%28	67.7%44	17.0%50	38.6%24
Nick Johnson	725	376	65.9%	3.452	112.558	109.144	51.6%52	33.7%64	16.8%46	44.2%82	51.8%42	69.8%54	17.9%56	36.4%28
Chase Claxton	484	617	44.0%	5.856	111.858	106.050	54.1%64	33.6%62	20.7%22	54.6%92	49.4%54	65.1%34	18.6%62	25.5%60
Alex Timmerman	446	655	40.5%	8.762	111.056	102.360	51.1%50	36.2%72	19.1%32	37.8%70	45.0%74	68.8%50	15.0%36	30.0%46
Sin'Cere McMahon	424	677	38.5%	-6.736	109.952	116.626	52.8%58	30.7%50	17.2%44	36.1%66	52.5%38	69.4%52	14.1%30	36.1%28
Micheal Anumba	386	715	35.1%	4.754	116.568	111.836	56.4%74	32.2%56	17.6%42	48.4%86	53.1%36	68.8%50	18.1%58	38.3%24
Yoro Diallo	145	956	13.1%	19.880	113.360	93.578	53.3%60	41.0%86	20.7%22	42.6%78	40.6%88	78.4%86	10.0%10	28.1%52
Xavier McKelvy	109	992	9.9%	14.270	110.152	95.974	51.1%50	29.1%44	16.5%50	45.5%82	42.8%82	68.7%48	12.4%20	19.6%78

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kasen Harrison	875	226	79.5%	4.554	115.166	110.640	54.1%64	38.5%80	20.4%24	48.1%86	51.2%46	68.9%50	15.4%40	27.8%52
Kelton Talford	772	329	70.1%	12.268	108.248	96.074	50.7%48	34.9%66	20.1%26	37.5%68	42.6%82	70.7%58	16.0%44	25.9%58
Nick Johnson	725	376	65.9%	4.654	115.266	110.640	56.9%76	33.3%62	19.4%30	44.4%82	48.8%56	67.0%42	14.2%32	30.4%44
Chase Claxton	484	617	44.0%	1.648	114.764	113.134	52.9%58	33.5%62	15.4%58	37.1%68	52.2%40	72.3%66	14.8%34	43.5%16
Alex Timmerman	446	655	40.5%	0.246	115.166	114.930	55.0%68	31.7%54	16.8%48	48.9%86	55.3%26	68.8%50	17.9%56	37.7%26
Sin'Cere McMahon	424	677	38.5%	10.164	115.666	105.652	53.7%62	35.3%70	18.0%38	49.5%86	49.6%54	68.4%48	18.1%58	33.2%36
Micheal Anumba	386	715	35.1%	3.352	111.858	108.446	51.8%54	34.2%64	17.8%40	42.1%78	49.5%54	68.8%50	15.9%44	32.3%38
Yoro Diallo	145	956	13.1%	1.348	113.462	112.136	53.4%60	32.4%58	17.3%44	44.5%82	52.4%40	67.0%42	17.7%56	35.3%30
Xavier McKelvy	109	992	9.9%	2.852	113.862	111.038	53.6%62	34.1%64	17.8%40	44.1%80	51.7%44	68.8%50	17.1%52	36.1%30

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.